(Pocket-lint) – Apple announced the iPhone 12 mini, iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max at an event on 13 October, succeeding the iPhone 11, 11 Pro and 11 Pro Max from 2019, though the iPhone 11 will still be available alongside the new models.
How do the four latest models differ though? We’ve run up the specs for the iPhone 12 mini, iPhone 12, iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max against each other to help you work out which is right for you.
What’s the same between the iPhone 12 models?
Similar squarer design
OLED displays
Front camera
A14 chip
iOS 14 software
5G
There are several similarities between the iPhone 12 models. They all feature a similar squarer design – even though there is some variation between the models in terms of finishes and camera lenses on the rear. The Pro models are more premium in appearance. They all run on the same A14 chip with next generation Neural Engine though, they all run on iOS 14 software and they are all 5G compatible.
They also all have OLED display panels with True Tone and Haptic Touch – though their resolutions differ – and they all come with the same front-facing camera, whilst also all being IP68 water and dust resistant.
All four models have Face ID, differentiating them from the iPhone SE model, which uses Touch ID. You can read more about the iPhone SE in our review.
What’s different between the iPhone 12 models?
Whilst the four new iPhones have some similarities, there are of course a number of differences.
Physical size
12 mini: 131.5 x 64.2 x 7.4mm, 135g
12: 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.4mm, 164g
12 Pro: 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.4mm, 189g
12 Pro Max: 160.8 x 78.1 x 7.4mm, 228g
The four new iPhones all vary in physical dimensions. The iPhone 12 mini is the smallest and lightest, while the iPhone 12 Pro Max is the largest and heaviest. The standard iPhone 12 and the iPhone 12 Pro have identical measurements, but the Pro is a little heavier.
Display size
12 mini: 5.4-inches
12: 6.1-inches
12 Pro: 6.1-inches
12 Pro Max: 6.7-inches
The iPhone 12 mini has the smallest display at 5.4-inches. It features a resolution of 2340 x 1080 pixels.
The iPhone 12 and iPhone 12 Pro are both 6.1-inches with resolutions of 2532 x 1170 pixels and the iPhone 12 Max is the largest at 6.7-inches with a resolution of 2778 x 1284 pixels.
Cameras
iPhone 12 mini/iPhone 12: Dual rear camera
iPhone 12 Pro/Pro Max: Triple rear camera
As you might expect, the rear camera setup is one of the main differentiating features between the iPhone 12 mini and iPhone 12 and the Pro models.
The iPhone 12 mini and iPhone 12 have a dual rear camera, comprised of a 12-megapixel wide-angle main camera and a 12-megapixel ultra-wide angle camera.
The iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max have a triple rear camera. Both have a 12-megapixel wide-angle camera, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide angle camera and a 12-megapixel telephoto camera.
To make things even more complicated though, the iPhone 12 Pro Max’s main lens and telephoto lens differ from the iPhone 12 Pro’s main lens and telephoto lens.
The 12 Pro has a telephoto lens with a 4x optical zoom capability and an aperture of f/2.0, while the 12 Pro Max’s telephoto lens is new, offering 5x optical zoom and an aperture of f/2.2. The Max’s main sensor is also new with 1.7µm pixels, though it has the same f/1.6 aperture and resolution as the iPhone 12 Pro.
The Pro models also have a LIDAR sensor for augemented reality, which you can read more about in our separate feature.
Storage options
12 mini/12: 64GB to 256GB
12 Pro/12 Pro Max: 128GB to 512GB
The iPhone 12 mini and iPhone 12 come in 64GB, 128GB and 256GB storage options.
The iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max will come in 128GB, 256GB and 512GB storage options.
Colours
12 mini/12: Five colours
12 Pro/12 Pro Max: Four colours
The iPhone 12 mini and the iPhone 12 come in Black, Blue, White, Green and Product(Red) colour options.
The iPhone 12 Pro and iPhone 12 Pro Max come in Pacific Blue, Gold, Graphite and Silver options.
Prices
As you would expect, the four iPhone 12 models all differ in price, with the Pro models sitting at the higher end and the iPhone 12 mini at the cheaper end.
The iPhone 12 mini starts at $699. It will be available to pre-order from 6 November, available 13 November.
The standard iPhone 12 starts at $799. It will be available to pre-order from 16 October, available 23 October.
The iPhone 12 Pro starts at $999. It will be available to pre-order from 16 October, available 23 October.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max starts at $1099. It will be available to pre-order from 6 November, available 13 November.
Conclusion
The only differences between the iPhone 12 mini and the iPhone 12 is physical size, display size and cost. Otherwise, the colours, storage options, camera and hardware is identical between the two models, as well as the design.
The iPhone 12 is the same size as the iPhone 12 Pro model, but the Pro model has a more advanced rear camera setup, as well as a more premium finish and different co
(Pocket-lint) – Google Pixel devices have changed direction in 2020. The Pixel 4a was expected, but then delayed, launching pretty close to the announcement of the devices that followed – the Pixel 4a 5G and this phone, the Pixel 5.
Of these, the Pixel 5 carries a new name; it’s a solo device, without an XL model to appeal to those wanting a bigger phone. And with pretty much the same hardware as the Pixel 4a 5G, the Pixel 5 is a slightly confusing device – smaller, yet more expensive, with just a few unique features attempting to justify the higher price.
Can the Google Pixel 5 really justify its worth?
Design
Dimensions: 144.7 x 70.4 x 8mm / Weight: 151g
Aluminium body, IP68 dust- & weather-sealed
Hidden ear speaker
The Pixel 5 looks pretty much the same as the Pixel 4a and 4a 5G. There’s no avoiding the fact that they look like a family of phones. In fact, one might ask why the Pixel 5 is called the Pixel 5, when it’s pretty much identical to the Pixel 4a 5G, except smaller.
That’s a strange position for a smaller phone. But the Pixel 5 pushes a couple of features to try and justify its higher pricing, namely an aluminium body – although it’s coated and textured, so it doesn’t feel like a metal phone like the HTC One M8 did.
Instead that coating is matte, so stays free from smears and is nice and grippy, but doesn’t feel too different to coated plastic. In fact, it’s not hugely different to the plastic finish of the Pixel 4a 5G in terms of feel. There’s a textural difference, sure, but it’s not like the difference between, say, bare metal and plastic. However, it might have better longevity.
The layout, ports and buttons on the Pixel 5 match the Pixel 4a 5G too, with the only obvious external difference really being the ear speaker and the lack of 3.5mm headphone socket. On the Pixel 4a models there’s an obvious grille at the top of the display, while on the Pixel 5 there isn’t – it’s embedded, hidden from sight.
It’s also not very good. Hiding that ear speaker has two major effects: firstly it reduces the quality of incoming calls. Talk to someone with a deep voice, or turn the volume up on a call, and you’ll feel that reverberate through the body of the phone, which isn’t nice, while sounding rather muffled. Yes, you can hear what they are saying, but it lacks quality.
Secondly, while boasting “stereo speakers” on the spec sheet, it lacks the clarity and punch that you’d expect. With the top speaker being muffled and rather weak, the base speaker is left carrying the can. Side-by-side against the Pixel 4a 5G, the Pixel 5 sounds rubbish – and that means that music, videos or games you play, just don’t sound like they are coming from a phone with stereo speakers.
What we do like, however, is the return of the fingerprint scanner on the rear of the phone. Having used phones dominated by the under-display fingerprint scanner for a number of years, the return of this simple technology is welcomed – it’s fast, it’s easy to unlock and really reliable. Others might say it’s a step backwards, though.
Display
6.0-inch OLED, 2340 x 1080 resolution (432ppi)
90Hz refresh rate, HDR support
The display on the Pixel 5 is pretty compact; the 6-inch size in nice and easy to manage, resulting in a frame that’s not too large. It’s flanked by the Pixel 4a at 5.81-inches and the 4a 5G at 6.2-inches, the latter obviously having greater appeal thanks to being larger and cheaper.
To give the sense that the Pixel 5 is offering something more premium it has a 90Hz refresh rate, while the other devices are 60Hz. This can mean that some of the visuals are smoother, for example scrolling through lists and with wider adoption for games, faster refresh rates are delivering clearer visuals for some gamers too.
But it’s one of those things that you barely notice unless you have the devices side-by-side – and in many applications, a faster refresh rate makes little or no difference. When it comes to managing your messages, the camera or watching movies, it’s an irrelevance. It’s a case of being nice to have, but not a deal breaker.
Google sticks to a Full HD+ resolution which is perfectly fitting for this phone, while high dynamic range (HDR) support can boost the visuals within supported streaming services. We can’t complain about the colour, vibrancy or detail, because this OLED display looks good, indoors and out.
One thing we did notice is that while streaming content on Prime Video, it never moved from HD to 1080p resolutions, where most phones of this ilk will make that transition pretty soon after you start watching. Netflix, however, offered HDR titles – we suspect the Prime Video resolution issue is a temporary problem.
There’s a neat punch hole for the front camera in the top corner, and while it’s not the smallest opening ever, it’s not too intrusive either.
Hardware and performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 8GB RAM
4,080mAh battery capacity
5G connectivity
128GB storage
One of the major shifts in Google’s phone strategy in 2020 has been moving the Pixel 5 from the true flagship space into the sub-flagship space. Equipped with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, this is a 5G phone and, like many others on this hardware in 2020, it offers great performance.
What’s most remarkable is how Qualcomm has closed the gap between the mid-range and the flagship in terms of performance. This is a slick and fast phone, it doesn’t stutter or struggle like mid-range devices used to, but importantly the Snapdragon 765 has enabled cheaper devices. In essence you don’t need a Snapdragon 865.
There’s some very capable competition in this segment, like the OnePlus Nord for example, but it’s a repeat performance in terms of the power on offer from the Pixel 5.
We have noticed that the fancy aluminium body is more prone to becoming warm under load: spend an hour playing Call of Duty Mobile and the Pixel 5 will definitely be warmer than the Pixel 4a 5G – which is also a Snapdragon 765 device) – although not uncomfortably so. It’s hard to see the Pixel 5 as a gamers’ phone anyway because of the smaller screen size, but the point is that it’s still able to run the top games without a problem.
The battery life is also good. Lots of things run in the right direction here: a reasonable 4080mAh capacity and a display that’s not too large, results in a phone that has the endurance to get through the day.
One of the benefits that it brings is wireless charging, which is something that both the Pixel 4a models miss out on. It also offers reverse wireless charging, meaning you can, for example, charge your Pixel Buds by placing them on the back of the phone. It’s a luxury, but it’s pretty clever too – and something we’ve seen from the likes of Samsung in the past.
The Pixel 5 supports 18W charging which is pretty fast, but not the fastest out there. Although it does at least come with an 18W charger in the box.
Ultra-wide: 16MP, 1.0µm, f/2.2, 107 degrees field of view
Front: 8MP, 1.12µm, f/2.0
The camera story for the Pixel should be pretty familiar by now, with the main camera here being the same core hardware as we’ve seen the previous few generations of Pixel phones. Don’t let that put you off, however, because the race to more megapixels doesn’t really pay dividends in the age of computational photography, which is where Google very much rules the roost.
At its heart, this is a good sensor, but the results speak for themselves, as this phone will give you a usable shot in pretty much any situation – bright sunshine, overcast days, HDR scenarios or in darkness. That’s the Pixel’s strength – point, shoot, share – and enjoy the fact that you don’t have to mess around in the process.
The same is applicable to the front camera, which gives great selfies in pretty much all conditions. They can be a little more contrasty than some rivals, but generally the quality is good in all conditions. The only downside is that it’s fixed focus, so perhaps less flexible than some. There’s two options for the front camera, a 1x view or 1.4x view which crops in a little closer. It’s perhaps a strange addition, but means you can choose if the photo is about your face, or about where you’re standing.
Google does a great job with edge detection to create portrait images, preserving the ability to edit the level of blur, but now with much more editing control through the Photos app. This takes a leaf out of Snapseed – allowing easy adjustments of lots of different aspects of you image, with a lot more guidance than previously too. In fact if you have Snapseed installed, you can head into the “more” section of the editor to open the image up directly in Snapseed itself or other photo editing apps on your phone.
Because this is Google and it’s using computational photography, you can apply edits to images that were taken without the specific hardware on this phone. For example, you can edit images to add portrait functions, like the new portrait lighting or background blur, no matter what camera they were taken on.
Night sight continues to offer stellar performance, but now acts automatically – so you don’t have select it to use it (although you can turn off the automatic Night Sight if you wish). That will take a longer exposure and process away image noise and discolouration to get a better final result – and we still think that Night Sight is among the best performers for low-light imagery you’ll find on a phone, especially in these mid-range prices.
There’s more smarts in the new camera app too, with things like a level that will not only reveal your roll (horizontal tilt) but also the pitch (vertical tilt) so you can line up better photos and avoid the distortion that comes from not having the lens square-on to the subject.
Best smartphones 2020: The top mobile phones available to buy today
However, there’s no zoom lens on the Pixel 5. Google flirted with that on the Pixel 4 and has now moved over to ultra-wide instead. It’s a lower quality lens, with smaller pixels and a narrower aperture, so it’s less capable than the main camera in challenging situations. Yes, it will take an ultra-wide photo in low light, but it will be a lot more grainy than those from the main camera, with not even Google’s computational magic able to clean it up. But it does manage to escape the worst of the blurring towards the edges, so it’s a better ultra-wide than some cheaper rivals – but also note that it’s only 107 degrees, so there are wider lenses out there, which might explain the better relative performance.
Moving to zoom and it’s all digital. The app offers a tap to 2x zoom and that’s perfectly usable. There’s digital zoom out to 7x, but at that point it’s pretty mushy and not great. There’s also a bug in camera, where often you can take a 2x zoom picture and it saves as 1x instead. This is common when you take a 1x photo, then a 2x photo and hit the preview icon to take a look. You’ll see the 2x image processing, and then it jumps back to the 1x view. You can avoid it, but just check to make sure you’re getting the image you think you are – but in the screen recording below you can see what happens.
Having mentioned processing, it’s worth saying that processing is part of living with a Pixel camera. As we found with the Pixel 4a, the Pixel 5 will spend some time processing images you’ve just taken before you arrive at the best version of that photo. It’s not a critical problem, but if you take a photo and then view it right away, be prepared to look at some processing.
There are video enhancements on the Pixel 5 and they can be a lot of fun. You can capture in 4K and apply a range of different stabilisation types. There’s normal everyday stabilisation that will remove handshake, for example, but then there’s lock, active and cinematic pan, the last of which gives you a slow motion pan that’s nice and steady. They are great fun and easy to use, ideal to get creative with video.
While it doesn’t have all the lenses that you’d get on a flagship model, the overall performance from this camera is great. One of the downsides, of course, is that the Pixel 4a 5G camera is exactly the same – and in a cheaper model.
Pure software charms
Android 11
Some Pixel extras
The major advantage in owning a Pixel device is that you get the best of Google first. You’ll be at the front of the queue when it comes to software updates, while also getting some of the software features that make Pixels special.
But for anyone coming from another manufacturer, the Pixel’s approach – free from bloat, with nothing preinstalled or tinkered with – makes for a great experience. There’s enough thrown in, like the live wallpapers and the Now Playing feature that will tell you what songs are on in the background, to make the Pixel feel a little bit special in the Android world.
Then there added features in Android 11, such as native screen recording, that adds skills to what you’ll get from Android without the need to use additional apps.
Verdict
The Pixel 5 is something of an oddball. On one level, this is a very competent phone. It has the power, camera, performance and the build quality to offer a great experience. It’s close to a flagship experience and for those wanting a compact device, it’s a great choice.
But there are downsides, such as the poor ear speaker which detracts from the package, and there’s also the issue of the cheaper Pixel 4a 5G. The cheaper phone lacks the waterproofing, the wireless charging and the 90Hz display, but it otherwise has a larger display for less money with much the same performance – including the same camera – while also having better speakers and a 3.5mm headphone socket. So why pay more for less?
For some people, the lure of the solid camera experience, the pure Google software – while remaining at the front of the update queue – all wrapped in a premium package, makes the Pixel 5 a tempting handset.
Alternatives to consider
OnePlus Nord
The OnePlus Nord is bigger, but cheaper, while being just as powerful. It doesn’t have the camera skills of the Pixel, however.
Read our review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (5G), is a bona fide flagship device. It is larger, more powerful, with the option for expanded storage, while also offering a 120Hz display. Yes, it’s more expensive, but it’s still cheaper than most flagships – and you’re getting a lot more phone.
Dirt 5 on next-gen, Nest Audio review and more – Pocket-lint Podcast 74
(Pocket-lint) – You might ask why the Pixel 4a 5G basically has the same feature set as the Pixel 5, rather than just being a larger version of the Pixel 4a that was announced earlier in 2020.
That would be a well-placed question too, because Google’s 2020 line-up of Pixel devices isn’t as straightforward as it has been in the past.
The Pixel 4a 5G is the largest device of the lot, with the same core power and same camera as the Pixel 5, but at an even lower price point. So how does that work?
Design
Dimensions: 153.9 x 74 x 8.2mm / Weight: 168g
Stereo speakers and 3.5mm socket
Polycarbonate body
Finish: Just Black
While there’s much about the Pixel 4a 5G that bears a resemblance to the Pixel 4a, with its polycarbonate back and black colouring – that’s the only option we’ll be getting in the UK – both these phones share a design with the Pixel 5 too.
The advantage that the Pixel 5 holds is that it uses an aluminium enclosure, so it’s a more premium material, but it’s coated and painted, so doesn’t feel too different to the Pixel 4a models. There’s the soft warmth of plastic here, but with a matte finish, so it stays free from fingerprints. It’s not quite as grippy as the texture of the Pixel 5, not quite as fancy as the ‘Glasstic’ of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, but it doesn’t feel cheap.
There’s no flex to it and a decent heft to the phone, which brings it closer to the premium end of the mid-range in which this phone really sits. There’s no IP rating on this phone – so it’s not as well weather-protected as the Pixel 5 – but that’s not uncommon in phones in this price bracket – the Sony Xperia being about the only exception.
There’s a rear mounted fingerprint scanner that’s fast, reliable, and on reflection, a lot easier to use than under-display scanners that have adorned many recent devices. So while it doesn’t make for such a seamless look to the back of the phone, we can’t help feeling a sense of relief with the ease of use it brings.
There’s another major difference that the Pixel 4a 5G exhibits over the Pixel 5 in the audio department. The Pixel 4a 5G, as a cheaper device, has been adorned with a 3.5mm headphone socket. That’s useful for those with legacy devices – or wanting the convenience – but it’s not the most important thing.
While the Pixel 5 hides the ear speaker at the top of the display, the Pixel 4a 5G has a grille in the bezel, like the smaller Pixel 4a, which lets the sound out. That, combined with the main loud speaker on the bottom of the phone, makes for a much better audio experience than the more expensive Pixel 5.
Calls sound better, the stereo effect is better, and the experience when watching video or playing games is better. It’s a better solution overall, and that plays to this phone’s positioning with a larger display for those more interested in watching video or gaming.
Display
6.24-inch Full HD+ OLED display
2340 x 1080 pixels (413ppi)
Punch hole camera
60Hz refresh
The big sell of the Pixel 4a 5G is that it has a bigger display – it’s the largest of the 2020 Pixel devices, at 6.24-inches. Google has stuck to a Full HD display and that’s been pretty common on devices in 2020, especially around this price level.
It’s a good display too, using an OLED panel, so it has the colour and vibrancy that you’d expect, meaning nice deep blacks. It supports high dynamic range (HDR), so that will swing in on compatible services like Netflix to give you even better visuals.
The thing that separates this display from that on the Pixel 5 is that it only has a 60Hz refresh rate. That means that the Pixel 5 can look smoother when scrolling around some content, thanks to its 90Hz panel, but you’ll only really notice if you have the two devices side-by-side.
Arguably, a faster refresh rate on this larger device would be good to support things like games, but there are many instances when a faster refresh rate makes no difference to the experience, like when watching movies, so it’s hardly a deal breaker.
There’s a punch hole in the display for the camera – which isn’t the smallest example of punch holes, but it isn’t obtrusive either.
Hardware and performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, 6GB RAM, 128GB storage
3,800mAh battery capacity
5G connectivity
The Pixel 4a 5G owes that next-gen connectivity to the hardware inside, the excellent Qualcomm Snapdragon 765, here with 6GB RAM. It’s the same core hardware that you’ll find in the Pixel 5, a slight step-up from the Pixel 4a which has Snapdragon 730 and only offers 4G connectivity.
Snapdragon 765 has been all the range in 2020, powering many of the most exciting devices of the year and behind the growth of a more capable and affordable middle range of devices. The performance we’ve experienced from the Pixel 4a 5G in our testing so far is exactly as we’d expect – it’s very fast, smooth, and powerful. This hardware has no trouble playing the latest games and the experience is better than it is on the Pixel 5 – thanks to the larger display and the better sound quality – while the bodywork also doesn’t get as hot.
Side-by-side, we’d pick the Pixel 4a 5G over the Pixel 5 any day of the week when it comes to playing games and watching movies for this very reason – which is great for a phone that’s more affordable. The boosted hardware also means that it’s a better experience than the smaller Pixel 4a too, and more on par with devices like the OnePlus Nord.
While we’ve been testing this phone in parallel with the Pixel 5, we’ve not been able to fully assess the battery performance. It’s a 3,800mAh capacity – which sounds a little on the small side for a device of this size – and there are some competitor devices, such as the Moto G 5G Plus, that have a much more capacious battery.
There’s no wireless charging here – as found in the Pixel 5 – but you do get 18W charging, with that fast charger included in the box. As we said, we’ll continue to test the battery and will update as soon as we have a full picture of typical performance.
Ultra-wide: 16MP, 1.0µm, f/2.2, 107 degrees angle of view
Front: 8MP, 1.12µm, f/2.0
The cameras on the Pixel 4a 5G are, surprisingly, the same as the Pixel 5, leaving the smaller Pixel 4a as the odd model out. It’s also another minor point of confusion around the naming of these devices. The good news is that you’re getting the same experience in the Pixel 4a 5G as you do in the Pixel 5 – and that’s a great performing camera.
We’ve not fully tested the Pixel 4a 5G, but we took most of the same test shots on the Pixel 4a 5G that we used for our Pixel 5 review – and there’s no difference between them, because it’s the same core camera system.
We will test the Pixel 4a 5G independently, but so far, these phones look to be exactly the same in terms of the results. The Pixel 5 offers audio zoom on video which the Pixel 4a 5G doesn’t, but otherwise the Pixel 4a 5G appears to be the same.
Like the Pixel 5, it also appears to have the same camera bug, where it will sometimes process a 2x digital zoom picture back to being a 1x zoom photo, but you can read more about that in our Pixel 5 review. We’re talking digital zoom, of course, as the 4a 5G lacks any kind of optical zoom lens – that’s something Google has done away with for the 2020 line-up.
A clean software experience
Android 11
Pixel extras
One of the advantages in opting for a Pixel device, of course, is that you get to be front of the line whenever there’s anything new coming to Android. That means the Pixel 4a 5G comes with Android 11 out of the box – and while there aren’t huge changes on the surface to Android 10, there are a couple of goodies, like the native screen recording, which are a nice addition.
It also means that you escape the bloat or pre-installs that you get from many other manufacturers. While there are cheaper devices that offer this level of hardware and comparable specs, there aren’t many, except perhaps Nokia and Motorola, that give you a bloat-free software experience.
Again, it’s essentially the same experience as the Pixel 5 and so far we’ve found it to be slick and fast in operation, but we’ll continue to test the phone before reaching a final conclusion.
Dirt 5 on next-gen, Nest Audio review and more – Pocket-lint Podcast 74
First Impressions
The Pixel 4a 5G makes a lot more sense to use than the Pixel 5. Given that it has essentially the same core power, better audio, a larger display, and the same camera performance, all for a cheaper price, it’s the phone to choose from the two. For those looking for a cheaper device there’s the Pixel 4a, but when it comes to bang for your bucks, we’d take the Pixel 4a 5G – and not because of the connectivity.
Of course we need to put more time into testing the battery and seeing if there are any quirks in the software – as well as a deeper camera assessment – but we suspect that impression will remain. We’re not scoring the Pixel 4a 5G until we’ve finished the review process, but we’re currently convinced that it’s the best Pixel of the bunch.
Alternatives to consider
OnePlus Nord
The OnePlus Nord is a little more affordable and has a faster refresh rate on the display, but lacks the camera skills you get from the Pixel.
Best smartphones 2020: The top mobile phones available to buy today
Read our review
Moto G 5G Plus
Moto offers great performance with a clean install of Android, but again can’t match the camera of the Pixel. It’s a lot cheaper, however, with a much bigger battery.
(Pocket-lint) – The final version of the Galaxy S20 to launch in 2020 is designed to offer the fans what they want. That’s behind the name – Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, or Fan Edition – while strategically, it gives Samsung another roll of the S20 dice, to try and attract those who didn’t take a bite of the apple the first time around.
Make no mistake, this is a flagship phone that’s been pulled back slightly to land at a much more appealing price – and that makes this a winning Samsung Galaxy phone. Indeed, it makes it a winning flagship choice – whether you’re a Samsung fan or new to the brand.
Let’s talk about the ‘Glasstic’ design
Six colours: Cloud Navy / Lavender / Mint / Red / White / Orange
Dimensions: 74.5 x 159.8 x 8.4mm / Weight: 190g
Plastic back (AKA ‘Glasstic’)
IP68 waterproof
A lot is said about the switch from glass to plastic – what Samsung calls Glasstic. There’s a seam of criticism that’s outspoken on social media about what constitutes premium and what doesn’t. For the Galaxy Note 20, a lot of people – presumably who had never seen the phone, let alone held it – dismissed it as wrong because it was plastic, not glass.
That’s a hard position to take, in reality, because the durability of plastic is so good. Cutting the number of glass surfaces in half means there’s less to smash for starters. And having now lived with the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE for a couple of weeks, it’s easy to see the materials debate as a storm in a teacup.
The Glasstic back is warmer to the touch, it feels softer, it has a matte finish, and it’s a lot easier to keep clean. There’s barely a smudge or smear on the thing, unlike the glass back of so many other phones. It’s cheaper, sure, but the phone is cheaper too (unlike the Samsung Note 20, which is where this controversy started).
But importantly the fit, finish, look and feel of the Galaxy S20 FE isn’t cheap. In fact, we prefer it, along with that assurance that if we do drop it, we’re unlikely to see a catastrophic shattering of the back of the phone. Yes, we’ve broken plenty of glass phones in our time.
The other big thing you’ll notice from a design point of view is that the display is flat. That makes the bezels more visible, but they’re actually very neat. It’s slightly strange that the punch hole camera seems to have a reflective ring around it; it doesn’t look deliberate, but it certainly catches the eye and that means it doesn’t blend in quite as well as some do. In reality, that doesn’t matter – we’ve not noticed it much when using the phone day-to-day, so we’re happy to set it aside as a peculiar quirk.
Otherwise the Galaxy S20 FE is very much an execution of Samsung design, wrapped in a package with IP68 protection – meaning it’s waterproof to 1.5m deep for up to half and hour. It’s great to have protection at this level, as it’s usually the preserve of the most expensive phones.
Display
6.5-inch AMOLED panel, 120Hz refresh rate, 2400 x 1080 resolution
Under display fingerprint sensor
Samsung is known for its display panels and the S20 FE doesn’t disappoint. With the curved edges gone, there’s perhaps slightly less wow factor to this phone. But at the same time it avoids the downsides of curved screens – namely that they can introduce phantom touches around the edges or that the extreme edges are less responsive.
That’s something we’ve noticed in games in the past – and having put the S20 FE through many hours of Call of Duty Mobile, we’re actually very happy with it. The size, too, is great, because it feels like this is the sweet spot for us, remaining manageable while giving content enough space to shine.
It’s a Full HD+ display with a 120Hz refresh rate, designed to reduce blur in fast motion. That can be particularly important in games and there’s a growing list of titles that support faster refresh rates, from the likes of Real Racing 3, through to the forthcoming Call of Duty Mobile update.
Whether that makes a difference to you will depend on a lot of things – how much time you spend gaming, how keen your eyes are, how much you spend fast scrolling through information-dense apps – but in many cases, the celebration of faster refresh rates is a little misguided, with many confusing software optimisation and hardware performance. Bad software or a slow user interface (UI) is still just as bad at 120Hz.
Look for that 120Hz smoothness and you’ll find it, but Samsung still gives you the option to switch back to 60Hz, which potentially reduces battery drain as the display isn’t working as hard. For this review we’ve left the phone at 120Hz because the drain on the battery hasn’t been a concern.
As with all Samsung devices, the brightness and pop to the display really makes a difference. Moving to this phone from a mid-range phone – albeit a good mid-range one – the Nokia 8.3 – and there’s still a quality difference here between Samsung panels and some alternatives.
The vibrancy of the colours is a delight, bringing a richness to your content so things just look better than on other devices. You can alter the saturation if you find it too rich, but we also really like the fact that the Samsung One UI will let you turn off adaptive brightness from the slider, meaning it’s really easy to switch off auto-brightness when you don’t want it – such as when gaming – and switch it back on again when you do, for when it gets dark.
The richness of the display can crush some darker tones though. While the deep blacks are impressive – and a signature look of AMOLED displays – than can mean that shadow detail on movies can vanish, so you might have to pump the brightness up a little.
There’s also one minor thing that might impact on those with polarised sunglasses: the screen dims radically in portrait orientation. But it’s not a complete blackout, so it’s shouldn’t be a huge issue come summertime.
Hardware and specs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 processor
6GB RAM, 128GB storage
4500mAh battery
5G connectivity
Before we talk about the hardware, let’s talk about the fingerprint scanner. This is an optical scanner rather than the ultrasonic scanner that Samsung uses in its higher-spec S20 devices. And we can tell the difference. We’ve found it less reliable and slower to unlock that some other implementations and it feels like a step-down from the other S20 models.
Having used some old school rear-mounted fingerprint scanners recently – which are blisteringly fast – this under-display scanner feels a little slower. Having had some fails we recorded the same thumbprint again and that seemed to make it a little better. It’s not a huge issue, but it’s just not the slickest out there.
What does stand-out is that this is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Samsung phone – something that’s a rarity in the UK and Europe for Samsung Galaxy devices, which are usually Exynos powered. That was part of the reasoning behind this FE device, as globally, the 5G version is Snapdragon 865. It’s paired with 6GB RAM, slightly less than the Galaxy S20 models, but so far we’ve not noticed that to make any real difference.
That’s a key thing to look out for on this phone, however, as the 4G version (if the 4G version is available in your market, which it is in Europe), will be the Exynos 990 version. Just make sure you know what you’re buying and what you want from it. The Qualcomm vs Exynos debate is one that’s been raging amongst Samsung fans for many years. In reality, the difference – from prospective power, to a purported faster draining of battery on Exynos – is likely only slight and in most situations, you’d have no idea what was powering your phone unless someone told you.
That said, having closely followed Qualcomm’s developments over the past few years and used a good number of Snapdragon 865 devices in 2020, we’ve been universally impressed by the S20 FE’s performance. Importantly, it gives you a more direct comparison to other devices you might be looking at. Companies like OnePlus and Xiaomi offer aggressively-priced Snapdragon 865 devices – and now Samsung feels a little more competitive in this space too.
The performance really speaks for itself. There’s speed and snap to everything and we’ve found this a great phone for gaming, because it can cope with the demands that some modern games are stating to put on phones. We’d seen a little slowdown in the last-generation of flagship devices when playing games like Call of Duty Mobile (especially Shipment 1944, which can be really busy) and Snapdragon 865 copes with this better – so the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE copes better.
The 128GB storage is pretty standard and the support for up to 1TB extra via microSD means that future expansion is open to you – storage basically won’t be a worry. There’s no sense that Samsung is trying to leverage storage to pump up the price – as you’ll find on the iPhone.
The S20 FE’s battery capacity, at 4,500mAh, is reasonable – the same as the Galaxy S20+ that this phone directly rivals – and we’ve found it to get through days without a problem. Throw in a couple of hours of hardcore gaming and you’ll be needing that charger towards the end of the day, but overall, this phone feels like it benefits from the hardware changes made for the FE to give better endurance.
We also need to give a word over to sound quality. There’s no 3.5mm headphone socket, there’s no adapter in the box for USB-C to 3.5mm either, but it is equipped with excellent speakers. These support Dolby Atmos, in that you can toggle on a virtualised wider sound stage to make things sound better, and there’s enough volume to really make the phone sing. We’ve even had people across the room ask with surprise if it’s the phone producing that sound. It’s great for YouTube, it’s great for gaming – it just sounds great thanks to the AKG-tuned stereo speakers.
What we like about the camera arrangement on this phone is that there are few gimmicks. There’s no unnecessary macro or depth sensor, just three usable, good quality lenses.
The main camera is the same 12-megapixel that we saw on the Galaxy S20 and we were impressed with the performance – which seems to be much the same on the S20 FE. It has the same great high dynamic range (HDR) treatment, meaning photos really have some pop and balance to them.
The main camera is generally a good performer, with plenty of options thrown in, including some smart suggestions to help you get better pictures. If it’s dark it will suggest night mode (just as the Google Pixel does), although it will attempt to take pictures in lower light anyway. These are passable, but the night mode is a lot more accomplished, thanks to longer exposure times, so you’ll get a cleaner shot. Night mode is also available across cameras – it can be used on the ultra-wide (although the results are poor), when zooming (although it’s limited to 10x digital zoom), as well as on the front camera.
The main camera is joined by a ultra-wide camera and telephoto, both very usable, but spec spotters will notice that the telephoto here is just 8-megapixels, rather than 64-megapixels as on the S20 models. That’s where the cost savings come in. On those Galaxy models launched earlier, the 64-megapixel sensor was also used to capture 8K video, which the S20 FE can’t offer at this resolution. As it sticks to 4K, that video is captured through the main camera instead, with 4K/60fps the top option. There’s also an experimental HDR10+ video capture mode, although that’s only available up to 4K/30fps.
The ultra-wide camera is always popular, able to capture shots that squeeze lots into the frame easily, which is ideal for the great outdoors. This can be a little blurry towards the edges of the frame, but generally it’s a fun lens, especially if you have good bright conditions.
Best smartphones 2020: The top mobile phones available to buy today
The telephoto lens offers Samsung’s 30x Space Zoom, wanting to keep up with the other S20 models. Here it has a 3x optical lens that then gives 10x digital zoom to hit that headline figure. It’s stabilised and you can get usable shots from it, but the quality drops off rapidly. The 3x shots are pretty good, but at 10x zoom it’s losing grip – and by the time you get to 30x zoom it’s more like a watercolour painting.
Samsung plays a little trick in lower light, using the main camera for zoom out to 10x to try and deliver better quality from the larger sensor and wider aperture, before switching to the telephoto for the end of the range (which isn’t great). If it’s really dark, i.e. night time, it doesn’t use the telephoto lens at all – it just stops at 10x digital zoom.
The front camera is reasonable too, but not hugely impressive. In daylight conditions you’ll get a good selfie from it, and there’s fun options for bokeh with effects, but as soon as the light dips you’ll find image noise is more present. Indoor shots will see shadow noise and here it can’t compete with some rivals – the Google Pixel beats it in our opinion (although admittedly there’s a harsher styling to Google’s selfies) – although supporting night mode is also useful and can make a noticable difference.
We question the use of a 32-megapixel sensor, which is used for pixel combining for better lower-resolution quality, and we suspect this is behind the fairly poor dynamic range of the selfie camera. But it does have one trick: switching views when it detects a larger group. This means it can take a wider selfie – and the files are actually different, moving from a 6.5-megapixel (average) to 10-megapixel for the wide – suggesting the pixel combining it’s using is different. You can also take 32-megapixel selfies if you want – although why you’d want to, we can’t imagine.
Verdict
Back when the Galaxy S10 Lite launched it raised the question about what Samsung was trying to achieve with its sub-tier flagship devices. That phone was anything but “lite” and very respectable. The S20 Fan Edition seems to be the new change of direction that’s easier to understand: a device that retains the flagship essentials, while making a few calculated moves to reduce the price.
The S20 FE’s overall spec – ignoring the storm-in-a-teacup Glasstic rear – stands the phone in good stead against many rivals. Sure, there are cheaper phones using the lower-spec Snapdragon 765 platform that are very good, but the Galaxy feels like a phone designed to draw you towards something a little higher-end. We’re drawn in, so it succeeds on that front.
So will the Fan Edition cannibalise the full-fat S20 models? There’s a good chance that it will. It’s free from gimmicks, it appears to hit all the right notes, and for us it’s the pick of the bunch.
Also consider
Poco F2 Pro
Dirt 5 on next-gen, Nest Audio review and more – Pocket-lint Podcast 74
Poco has always been about offering what fans want – and that’s power in a package that’s affordable. There are some drawbacks – the cameras aren’t great and the software isn’t that refined – but you get a low of power for your money.
Read our review
OnePlus 8
OnePlus has always been popular thanks to affordability and software optimisation. It’s a little cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE – but Samsung offers a better camera experience.
(Pocket-lint) – Realme has really taken it to the mid-range/low-end market in 2020, and that focus on offering lots of handsets with different focuses is continuing right into the holiday quarter. In the UK, it was one of the first to offer a 5G phone under £300, and now it’s launching a new series of powerful, well made non-5G phones in the same bracket.
The Realme 7 series is less about speed and performance and more about design, battery and camera performance, and the more expensive of the two phones in the series is the Realme 7 Pro, which comes with some features you’d only have seen on top tier flagships just a year or two back.
Design and display
160.9 x 74.3 x 8.7 mm
182 grams
Mist White and Mist Blue colours
6.4-inch Super AMOLED display
Full HD+ (2400 x 1080) 60Hz
Single hole-punch cutout
Realme 7 Pro comes in two finishes: Mist White and Mist Blue. Our unit is the deep blue model and has this unique and attractive finish on it. The entire thing has that frosted glass effect, which we’ve seen on a number of phones already, but Realme mixed it up by making one part along the left edge reflect light the opposite way to the section on the right.
That means when you’re looking at it, you get this effect where – if the right side of the phone is reflecting light at the top – it’s the bottom half of the strip along the left that reflects. It’s eye-catching without being too in-your-face. The rear feels solid and sturdy too, so no hollow bendy plastic feel.
Its camera housing is relatively subtle too. The four cameras are housed in a small rounded rectangle which protrudes slightly from the left corner, but not too much. It’s not an eye-sore in the slightest.
What’s the best mid-range phone under $400/£400?
As for buttons and ports, you get everything you’d expect. The right edge has the single power button with a neat little gold accent, while the two separate volume buttons live on the left. The bottom features the Type-C port and speaker grille, but also a 3.5mm input which will make any wired headphone users delighted.
The front is dominated almost entirely by the 6.4-inch Super AMOLED display built by Samsung. It has skinny bezels up the sides and a small cutout for the camera in the top corner, ensuring that you get that real full-screen effect. The bottom bezel (or chin) is quite a lot thicker than the rest of the frame, but that’s to be expected at the lower end of the market. It’s not really an issue.
On first impressions, the full HD+ AMOLED panel certainly seems vibrant and punchy. Colours are vivid without being too oversaturated and although ‘only’ 1080p, it still seems sharp to the eye at arm’s length.
Performance and hardware
Snapdragon 720G processor
8GB/128GB RAM and storage
4,500mAh battery
65W SuperDart Charge
It’s not just the outside of the phone that looks decent for the money, the internals are pretty spicy too. To keep it ticking over smoothly, the engine behind all the processes is the Snapdragon 720G platform. It’s not quite top tier, but it’s certainly powerful enough to ensure you can get everything done and with little effort.
It’s joined by 8GB RAM and 128GB of storage, ensuring there’s not only enough memory to run background processes smoothly but also plenty of storage. If the 128GB isn’t enough for all your apps, photos and media, you can expand it further using the MicroSD slot which lives on the same pull-out tray as the nano SIM slots.
As for the battery, that’s a 4,500mAh cell – or rather – it’s two 2,250mAh cells joined together to form a 4,500mAh total capacity. The reason for this is that it uses that tasty 65W fast-charging technology developed by Oppo that can fully charge your phone in less than 40 minutes.
In the past, we’ve mostly seen it on higher-end devices, and it really does change your battery charging cycle completely. You just don’t need to plug your phone in overnight, ever. 15 minutes plugged in is enough to get you a full day’s worth of power and so you can just plug it in before you start work while you get showered, dressed, breakfasted and you’ll have more than enough charge when you’re done and ready.
Cameras
Quad camera system
64MP f/1.8 primary (Sony IMX682)
8MP f/2.3 119-degree ultra-wide
2MP B+W portrait sensor
2MP f/2.4 macro sensor
32MP front-facing camera
As with most modern phones, there’s a quad-camera system here. And as with most modern mid-rangers, only two of those are actually usable on their own. You have a primary and an ultra-wide camera joined by two additional low-resolution sensors for capturing additional data.
One of those low res cameras is a 2-megapixel monochrome sensor that captures depth information and keeps your black and white photos looking contrasty. The other is a macro sensor.
As for the main cameras, they sound pretty solid. There’s a Sony-made 64-megapixel sensor which you’ll be using most of the time, and it’s joined by the 8-megapixel ultra-wide for those times you want to cram in more into your photos.
We’re yet to test the camera system, but we’ll be updating this review with full results once we’ve done some proper testing.
Best smartphones 2020: The top mobile phones available to buy today
First Impressions
Running up and down the spec list there’s very little here not to like, especially in the price bracket the phone fits in. When it comes to pure numbers and performance, you’ll struggle to find anything as compelling at the budget end of the market.
In fact, even within our first 24 hours or so of using the phone, there’s so much here going for it. Sure, it might not have 5G, but the rest of the experience seems fantastic given the price range.
Realme has given this phone a sub £300 recommended retail price in the UK, and for that to have a decent-looking AMOLED panel, super-fast charging and at least one capable camera is great value for money.
If you do want 5G for this price, there’s the Realme X50 5G which launched a little earlier in the year, but with that device you lose out on the AMOLED screen, in-display fingerprint sensor, fast charging and the build doesn’t feel as sturdy and premium.
Dirt 5 on next-gen, Nest Audio review and more – Pocket-lint Podcast 74
Last year, AMD released the Ryzen 3000 series desktop processors in one of the most monumental hardware launches of the modern era. This final step completed the Red brand’s ascent back into the forefront of the desktop processor market that began with the launch of the first generation of Ryzen CPUs.
With the Ryzen 3000 launch came the AMD X570 chipset. Featuring PCIe 4.0 support, X570 was an impressive leap from generations past. It was also hot, which had motherboards often include chipset cooling fans, and, more significantly, expensive. The high cost of the chipset increased the average cost of X570 motherboards considerably over previous generations.
While AMD has done a great job of maintaining motherboard compatibility with new generation processors, none of the previous-generation AM4 motherboards featured official PCIe 4.0 support, not even from the storage and PCIe controlled by PCIe 4.0 compatible CPUs. Enter B550, the more value-oriented little brother of X570. While the B550 chipset is PCIe 3.0 only, B550 motherboards support PCIe 4.0 from the CPU to the primary PCIe slot as well as the primary M.2 slot (dependent on a PCIe 4.0 ready CPU).
The ASRock B550 Taichi features a powerful VRM solution and a 16 power stage design utilizing 50 A stages from Vishay Semiconductor. The ASRock B550 Taichi even includes 2.5 Gb/s Ethernet using Intel’s new I225-V controller, as well as dual PCIe 4.0 slots. Coming in at the same price as its older X570 Taichi brother, does the ASRock B550 Taichi have what it takes to compete with X570?
2x Antenna ports 1x Bios Flashback button 1x HDMI port 1x DisplayPort 1.4 1x Optical SPDIF out port 1x LAN (RJ45) port 1x USB 3.2 (Gen2) Type-C port 4x USB 3.2 (Gen1) ports 1x USB 3.2 (Gen2) Type-A ports 2x USB 2.0 ports1x BIOS flashback Button 1x Clear CMOS button 5x 3.5 mm audio jacks
Audio:
1x Realtek ALC1220 Codec
Fan Headers:
7x 4-pin
Form Factor:
ATX Form Factor: 12.0 x 9.6 in.; 30.5 x 24.4 cm
Exclusive Features:
ASRock Front Panel Type C USB 3.2 Gen2 Header (10 Gb/s)
ASRock Super Alloy
XXL Aluminum Alloy Heatsink
Premium 60A Power Choke
50A Dr.MOS
Premium Memory Alloy Choke
Nichicon 12K Black Caps
I/O Armor
Matte Black PCB
High Density Glass Fabric PCB
2oz Copper PCB
Intel® 2.5G LAN
Intel® 802.11ax WiFi
ASRock Steel Slot Gen4
ASRock Full Coverage M.2 Heatsink
ASRock Hyper M.2 (PCIe Gen4x4)
ASRock Ultra USB Power
ASRock Full Spike Protection (for all USB, Audio, LAN Ports)
Ten months ago, AMD released the Ryzen 3000 series desktop processors in one of the most monumental hardware launches of the modern era. This final step completed the Red brand’s ascent back into the forefront of the desktop processor market that began with the launch of the first generation of Ryzen CPUs. Today, Intel is finally firing back with the launch of the 10th Generation Intel Core processors, along with a new motherboard standard to drive them.
As should be no surprise, the focus will remain on the new motherboards. While the 10th Gen Intel Core processors will not support PCIe 4.0 connectivity due to signal integrity issues, many of the Z490 motherboards are designed to support the PCIe 4.0 specification. This is accomplished by adding clock generators to help clean up the signal. Generally speaking, when it comes to long-term platform support, AMD has been the trendsetter. Has AMD’s long support of the AM4 socket on its newer generation processors inspired Intel to take similar steps?
So what is Z490 offering right now? For starters, there has been a large focus on VRM and VRM cooling design. With the top-level Intel Core i9-10900K featuring 10 cores along with HyperThreading, the ability to deliver clean, continuous power is going to be one of the primary factors that separates a good Z490 board from the competition. With the introduction of HyperThreading on Intel’s mid-range line-up, power delivery is going to be vital in all segments.
The AQUA line from ASRock is the brand’s “halo” product. Featuring everything except the kitchen sink, including a full-coverage mono block for custom water cooling and even a limited run serial number. This limited production board was first introduced for X570, with a run of 999 motherboards. Now, ASRock is back at it with another 999 board run on Z490 with the ASRock Z490 AQUA.
The ASRock Z490 AQUA features a 14 phase Vcore VRM utilizing top of the line 90 A power stages from Intersil. When paired with the included monoblock, this could easily be the coolest-running Z490 VRM to date. Beyond the VRM and watercooling, there is Thunderbolt 3 connectivity with two Type-C ports as well as two Mini DisplayPort inputs on the rear I/O. There is even a monochrome LED screen over the rear I/O that can be customized to display a variety of information.
With so many features to dig into I won’t waste any more time here—let’s see how the ASRock Z490 AQUA performs!
8x SATA 6 Gb/s port 3x M.2 port (SATA3/PCIe 3.0 x4)
Networking:
1x AQUANTIA AQC107 10G LAN 1x Realtek RTL8125AG 2.5G LAN 1x Intel 802.11ax WiFi module
Rear Ports:
2x Antenna ports 1x Bios flashback button 1x Clear CMOS button 2x Mini DisplayPort Input ports 1x HDMI port 2x Thunderbolt 3 Type-C ports 2x LAN (RJ45) port 4x USB 3.2 (Gen1) ports 3x USB 3.2 (Gen2) Type-A ports 3x USB 3.2 (Gen2) Type-C port 1x Optical SPDIF out port 5x 3.5 mm audio jacks
Audio:
1x Realtek ALC1220 Codec
Fan Headers:
8x 4-pin
Form Factor:
E-ATX form factor: 12.0 in x 10.5 in; 30.5 cm x 26.7 cm
Exclusive Features:
ASRock Super Alloy
XXL Aluminum Alloy Heatsink
Premium 90A Power Choke
90A Dr.MOS
Premium Memory Alloy Choke
Combo Caps (Nichicon 12K Black Caps)
Nichicon 12K Black Caps
I/O Armor
High Density Glass Fabric PCB
8 Layer PCB
2 oz copper PCB
AQUA Cooling Armor
Server-Grade Low-Loss PCB
AQUANTIA® 10G LAN
ASRock steel Slots
ASRock Full Coverage M.2 Heatsink
ASRock Ultra USB Power
ASRock Status OLED
ASRock Full Spike Protection (for all USB, Audio, LAN Ports)
ASRock Live Update & APP Shop
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.