cambridge-audio-melomania-touch-review:-touchy-feely

Cambridge Audio Melomania Touch review: Touchy feely

(Pocket-lint) – Cambridge Audio has been around for donkey’s years and has built something of a tradition in the world of home audio equipment. But in the world of headphones, it doesn’t quite draw the attention as much as the likes of Sony, Bose or Sennheiser. So when it launched a pair of true wireless earbuds, the Melomania 1, that was something of a surprise.

Even more of a surprise, perhaps, was that the Melomania 1 was both great-sounding and very affordable. So the follow-up pair had a high bar to meet. Can Cambridge Audio blow us away with great, affordable buds for a second time? Here’s how the Melomania Touch fares…

Design

  • Touch controls
  • IPX4 water resistance
  • Faux leather coated case
  • Available in black or white
  • 3x ear fin and 3x ear tip sizes for fit

Cambridge Audio launched its first pair of true wireless earbuds in 2018, and stood out from the market for a couple reasons. One of those was the design, which reminded us of little foam-tipped bullets. Of course, this shape wasn’t necessarily the most ergonomic or practical for in-ear fit, but the lightweight and easy-to-wear finish helped counter that. 

Pocket-lint

The Melomania Touch looks nothing like the first-gen model and doesn’t feel the same in the ears either. It’s a huge change in direction, and one that has its benefits and its drawbacks. 

The new warped teardrop-shape design of the Melomania Touch means these ‘buds are designed to fit and almost fill the inner part of your year, holding onto the middle ridge with an in-ear fin. That means, by their very nature, the individual ‘buds are a much more secure fit than the looser-fitting predecessors.

Because of the various sizes of fin and ear tips, we did find it took a couple of tries to get the right fit for us. Trying out a couple of different combinations we eventually settled on one that was comfortable but with a decent seal and with minimal pressure. Essentially just stepping down a size from the default fit. As we talk about in the sound section later on, getting this right fit is essential for good audio.

Pocket-lint

Even with a better fit for this generation you can still tell those tips are in your ear. As the tips are the standard shape and size for earbuds, you can always feel them in there and don’t quite get to that almost undetectable level you’ll find with wider cone-shaped tips. The Touch’s feel isn’t uncomfortable though, so you’ll be fine for a couple of hours at a time – too much longer and you will start to feel some sensitivity.

As we’re sure you gathered from the name ‘Touch’, these in-ears outer surface is touch-sensitive but of course, so you can use it to control various features, such as playing and pausing music or skipping tracks. Like most earbuds that feature this, it’s useful when you’re needing to use it on purpose. Most of the time we interacted with the Touch, however, it was accidentally.

The problem with such a large area being touch-sensitive is that if you try to adjust the fit, reach to remove the buds, or frankly do anything that involves touching them, it’s quite finicky trying to avoid that touch-sensitive area and inadvertently playing or pausing music.   

Pocket-lint

The charging case is a nice upgrade for this second-gen model. Rather than looking like a small pack of dental floss made from the beige plastic cast-off from a 1990s desktop PC, this cases is pill-shaped and coated in a soft faux leather. It’s a lovely looking and lovely feeling case, although we found the docks for each earbud could do with having stronger feeling magnet, to ensure that each ‘bud was absolutely in the right position to charge. 

Performance, features and voice calls

  • Bluetooth 5.0 and AAC
  • Qualcomm aptX, TrueWireless Stereo Plus
  • 7 hours music playback (33 hrs in case)
  • 50 hours total maximum battery life (in low power mode)

Cambridge Audio has equipped the Melomania Touch with a lot of the modern tech you’d hope to find in true wireless earbuds. There’s aptX for lag-free connection with most Android phones. In addition there’s Qualcomm’s other tech: TrueWireless Stereo Plus. This connects each earbud to the Android phone independently and to each other, rather than use one ‘bud as the primary and have the other feed from it.

There’s also Bluetooth 5.0 and AAC support, so Apple iPhone users are catered for. The Touch even uses Qualcomm’s tech for enhancing the clarity of voice calls, so while Cambridge Audio is something of a traditional British audiophile company, it’s had the sense to try and utilise expertise from available tech to make these ‘buds convenient for the day-to-day user who will want to use them for calls.

Pocket-lint

However, we did struggle at times with the wireless connectivity. It started with the initial setup, where we struggled with pairing and for the ‘buds to be discoverable – to the point where we went through the factory reset guide. Even then we could only get one ‘buds to pair – something that a firmware fix attempt couldn’t sort.

Given that all controls, including the reset process, are activated using that shiny touch-sensitive surface no physical feedback, it’s not exactly easy to perform such tasks. We’d much rather the Touch adopted a similar approach to the companies that have a single physical pairing button on the case itself, rather than trying to press-and-hold a touch-sensitive area on two earbuds simultaneously that’s curved and naturally slippery and may or may not respond as it’s supposed to. It’s finicky to say the least. 

So we ended up seeking a replacement pair of the Melomania Touch just to make sure everything checked out. Which, generally speaking, has been the case. Once paired with replacement ‘buds, our connection has been reliable during our testing. With music playing, we’ve had no issues with the audio cutting out once it’s got going.

But connectivity didn’t seem to be quite as on the ball in all areas: upon initial connection, having removed the ‘buds from the case, the music would start in one ear before the other by a second or so. That wait isn’t the norm these days.

Pocket-lint

Battery life is strong, even in its normal usage mode. Up to seven hours out of the case at a time is more than enough for anyone, even if you’re taking a long journey. Cambridge Audio says you can get up to 50 hours total battery time if you’re happy switching to low power mode, but the process on how to do that isn’t exactly obvious or easy within the app, and really we’re just not sure it’s worth the hassle. 

Getting up to 33 hours of total battery – including the charges in the case – is more than the average from most true wireless buds, so that’ll do just fine in our. Plus, you don’t have to put up with the lower quality sound you get from low power mode, which is actually this pair of ‘buds biggest plus point. 

Sound quality

  • 7mm drivers
  • Melomania app for EQ

As we’ve mentioned, the sound is highly dependent on the fit. For instance, if you have too snug a fit the bass will get a little too ‘boomy’ – particularly in songs where there’s some significant bass or bass drum powering the rhythm. As examples, the bass in Hoping by X Ambassadors or the kick drum in Dopeness by Black Eyed Peas. Some people might really like that high impact bass though. In a lot of songs it is highly enjoyable, but in others it just gets a tiny bit too much for our taste.



Best USB-C headphones for Android phones 2021


By Dan Grabham
·

Pocket-lint

Thankfully, there’s a manual equaliser (EQ) to adjust the sound to your own preference. This is found within the app, where you can also enable and adjust the transparency mode to let in external audio, so that you’re not completely blocked off from the world. 

Use a fit that’s less pressured and the sound changes a little to become a lot more natural and less bass heavy. Bass is still quite prominent, but it doesn’t detract from the rest of the frequencies. In fact, the 7mm drivers in these ‘buds are some of the most detailed you’ll hear at this price point.

So with the right fit you get loud and prominent bass, but also all  of the subtleties elsewhere in the mix Jangly piano is still bright and clear, as is subtle guitar string plucking, while vocals are delivered with clarity. Nothing is ever drowned out by those punchy bass notes. So all in all, it’s a dynamic sound that’s impressive at this end of the earbud market. And that’s what really matters.

Verdict

After loving the sound that came from the original Cambridge Audio Melomania 1, we had high hopes for the follow-up pair. And there’s no denying, the audio from the Melomania Touch is super – vibrant, punchy and hugely enjoyable.

But the earbuds suffer from connection issues and a design that’s just not hugely practical. Whether it’s the frustrating pairing process, or the fact that – at times – the connection to one of the ‘buds failed or was delayed, the experience lacked the polish we’d come to expect given the success of the first outing.

Still, once you have the Melomania Touch in our ears and are listening to music – and not touching them, because that touch-sensitive panel is easy to hit by accident – the music is so good.

In this price range you’re unlikely to find anything that sounds as dynamic and clear as these. We’re just wary given the connectivity ups and downs.

Also consider

Pocket-lint

Jabra Elite 75t

squirrel_widget_172296

As reliable a pair of true wireless ‘buds as you’ll find. These in-ears are small, comfortable to wear and deliver a sound solid. 

  • Read our review
Pocket-lint

Sony WF-SP800N

squirrel_widget_2669856

These sporty in-ears offer a lot of Sony’s smart ambient sound control and the noise-cancellation tech is the real star. Battery life is only average though, which is surprising given the (massive) size of the case. Overall these ‘buds sound great and offer plenty of customisation.

  • Read our review

Writing by Cam Bunton. Editing by Mike Lowe.

razer-blackwidow-v3-review:-what-lies-beneath

Razer BlackWidow V3 Review: What Lies Beneath

Our Verdict

The Razer BlackWidow V3 is a good performer that offers more customization than some of its companions. However, for fans of pink there are cosmetic issues that make the Quartz Edition hard to recommend over the black model, especially with some of the default lighting effects.

For

  • Solidly built
  • Comfortable typing

Against

  • Similar cosmetic issues to other BlackWidow V3 keyboards
  • Very large

The best gaming keyboards come in many shapes, sizes and styles. With RGB now basically expected of gaming clackers, how can a keyboard stand out in the looks department? Premium media controls can help. You can also go for a nice wrist rest or fancy keycaps and more. But nothing quite makes a keyboard stand out the way a pink color scheme does.

The Razer BlackWidow V3 ($140 as of writing) comes in black but is also available in pink, dubbed Quartz Edition. But not all pinks are made the same, and there’s, of course, more to a keyboard than its looks. Let’s find out if there’s a quality keyboard under that unique pigment, or if Razer simply decided to put lipstick on a pig. 

Razer BlackWidow V3 Specs 

Switches Razer Green (clicky) or Razer Yellow (linear)
Lighting Per-key RGB
Onboard Storage 5 profiles
Media Keys Yes (
Interface USB 2.0 Type-A 
Cable Attached, rubber
Additional Ports None
Key Caps Doubleshot ABS plastic
Construction Aluminum top plate, plastic base
Software Razer Synapse
Dimensions (LxWxH) 17.8 x 6.1 x 1.7 inches (45.2 x 15.5 x 4.3cm)
Weight 2.2 pounds (997.9g)

Design of the Razer BlackWidow V3 Quartz Edition 

Image 1 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 2 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 3 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 4 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 5 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 6 of 6

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Razer’s products often feature a black, green and grey color palette that looks striking to some and dull to others. The BlackWidow V3 can match this theme with a black hue, but the BlackWidow V3 Quartz Edition we’re reviewing distinguishes itself from the rest of the lineup with its powder pink pigment. This color will prove even more divisive—(which is probably why most keyboard manufacturers opt for ol’ reliable), but there’s no denying that it makes Razer’s Quartz collection distinctive.

Underneath that pink color scheme lies a full keyboard that seems massive in comparison to the Razer BlackWidow V3 Tenkeyless, especially with the optional wrist rest attached. If the tenkeyless model is a teacup pig, the Quartz edition BlackWidow V3 is a warthog. We expected this take on the keyboard to be bigger than the TKL model, but we weren’t expecting this large a difference. Without the wrist rest, this behemoth is17.8 inches long, 6.1 inches deep and 1.7 inches tall, compared to the tenkeyless model’s 1.62 x 14.26 x 6.1 inches and weighs 2.2 pounds to its smaller counterpart’s 1.85 pounds. Where the TKL felt reassuringly dense thanks to its aluminum top plate, this model is simply big and it demands attention.

Compared to other full-sized keyboards with dedicated media controls, though the BlackWidow V3 is of a comparable size, if not a bit long. For example, the Redragon K580 Vata is shorter, a little less long but deeper (17.6 x 7.6 x 1.5 inches ), and the HyperX Alloy Elite 2  is less, deep and tall than our review focus (17.5 x 6.9 x 1.5 inches ).

Nor were we expecting Razer to replace the base model BlackWidow V3’s volume roller. The black model’s roller features grooves that make it easier to, well, roll. This version replaces those grooves with a bunch of spikes that make the Quartz edition BlackWidow V3 look like something one might find in an accessories store that caters specifically to teenage girls. That one change had a dramatic effect on the keyboard’s style.

Similar to the BlackWidow V3 Tenkeyless, this full-sized version has some (in my opinion, ugly) keycaps that make the RGB backlighting look worse than it should. They’re doubleshot ABS plastic, which means they should be a bit more durable than your standard keycaps and the writing won’t fade. But the RGB comes through unevenly and looks smudged. That problem was frustrating on the TKL, but at least the issue was limited to the lighting. On the BlackWidow V3 Quartz Edition, the uneven RGB makes the pink coloring look washed out and kind of sickly.

This might seem overly critical of a keyboard’s color scheme, but that color palette is this keyboard’s raison d’etre. People are supposed to buy this version of the BlackWidow V3 because it’s pink, and that aesthetic choice will probably be weighed more heavily than anything else about the keyboard’s design. It’s a shame that such a potentially compelling look was let down by the same issues as other BlackWidow V3 models. 

Of course, you can opt for the black version, but we expect to the RGB to look uneven there too, like it did on the black version of the BlackWidow V3 Tenkeyless we tested. 

Typing Experience on the Razer BlackWidow V3 Quartz Edition

Razer offers the BlackWidow V3 with its clicky green or linear yellow mechanical switches. Our review model came equipped with Razer Green switches that boast a 50g actuation force, 1.9mm actuation point, and a 0.4mm difference between the actuation and reset point with a total travel distance of 4mm. The yellow switches change those specs to 45g, 1.2mm and 0mm, respectively, with a total travel distance of 3.5mm. Razer Green and Yellow switches can also be found in other BlackWidow V3 models, such as the wireless Razer BlackWidow V3 Pro or aforementioned TKL version. 

We ran through 10fastfingers.com’s typing test with the BlackWidow V3, a Logitech G Pro with Romer-G switches and the Apple Magic Keyboard for iPad Pro to get as close to an objective look at our performance on the keyboard as we could get. (The test isn’t perfect, and there’s bound to be variance, but at least it’s quantifiable.) We did the test three times on each keyboard and took the average for the final result.

The results: 114.66 words per minute (wpm) with 95.44% accuracy on the BlackWidow V3, 116.3 wpm with 97.47% accuracy on the G Pro and 114 wpm with 97.24% accuracy on the Apple Magic Keyboard. Razer’s offering performed well considering our familiarity with the other keyboards—we’ve used the G Pro for several years and spend a lot of time using the iPad Pro. Still, the head-to-head tests highlighted some of the BlackWidow V3’s flaws.

The biggest issue was notable pinging on many keys when they’re struck with enough force to bang out more than 100 wpm. The space bar offered a hollow “thud” in between words, too, which made the tests a bit maddening. There’s an important distinction between the pleasant “clack” of a clicky mechanical switch and the unpleasant “ping” of an unhappy spring. We found ourselves typing much slower in normal usage to avoid the latter.

It was also difficult to get the BlackWidow V3 in a comfortable position. The keyboard itself is laid out well—we didn’t notice any undue discomfort during everyday usage, the typing tests, or the writing of this review. But it’s a massive keyboard that we struggled to make room for on our desk in a way that made it easy to reach the mouse as well. (More on that in a moment.) Whether or not the number pad is worth that much space is subjective.

With its clicky Razer Green switches, the BlackWidow V3 will do fine during everyday use, despite pinging issues, when subjected to particularly forceful typing. Intrepid buyers could probably solve that problem with a bit of lube too.

Gaming Experience on the Razer BlackWidow V3 Quartz Edition

This BlackWidow V3 proved as responsive as desired in-game.  Something as simple as peeking after a flash in a game like Valorant requires a lot of key presses: Q to prep the flash, A to peek the corner, D to counter-strafe in time to make an accurate shot, Ctrl to crouch when you need to commit to a spray, etc. It never felt like that sequence was messed up because of the keyboard. (Let’s just say that our typing speed doesn’t always translate to in-game key presses.)

Our fingertips didn’t slide from the doubleshot ABS keycaps, it was comfortable to hover like a claw over that all-important WASD cluster and it didn’t take us any time to adapt to the layout when we needed to reach additional keys. We missed having an identifier on the “W” key, like what you” find on the Roccat Vulcan TKL Pro, but aside from that, Razer’s offering was pretty standard on the gaming keyboard front. It didn’t make us any better, nor it didn’t make us any worse.

But this is where the inclusion of a number pad becomes more divisive. TKL keyboards have become increasingly popular, in part because people who play first-person shooters, action games and other genres that don’t rely on that cluster of keys want as much room as possible for their best gaming mouse and mousepad. 

Having a behemoth keyboard like the BlackWidow V3 directly violates that principle. We simply couldn’t find a way to make the keyboard fit next to our large-sized Razer Gigantus V2 mousepad in a way that A) was ergonomically viable and B) didn’t look absolutely ridiculous to onlookers. 

How much this matters will depend on the games you like to play. Tactical shooters like Valorant and Counter-Strike: Global Offensive reward low in-game sensitivities, which means having a spacious, ergonomic setup is vital. Games that don’t require precise aim can make do with a smaller area of the desk. That isn’t to say ergonomics should ever be overlooked — everyone should try to make their setups as comfortable as possible — but it does mean space is relative.

Our fingertips didn’t slide from the key caps, it was comfortable to hover like a claw over that all-important WASD cluster and it didn’t take us any time to adapt to the layout when we needed to reach additional keys. We missed having an identifier on the “W” key, like what you” find on the k space would probably be better served by the TKL  version of the keyboard, however, and those seeking maximum responsiveness should probably opt for linear Razer Yellow switches.

Features and Software on the Razer BlackWidow V3 Quartz Edition

Image 1 of 3

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 2 of 3

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

Image 3 of 3

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

The BlackWidow V3 relies on Razer Synapse 3 and the Chroma Studio add-on for its customization. Synapse 3 offers the ability to disable the Windows key by toggling Gaming Mode, determine when the keyboard should go to sleep and choose from a list of default RGB effects. You can use Chroma Studio to set per-key RGB lighting in the 16.8 million color spectrum. We don’t necessarily love having to install multiple apps to access those settings, but it’s become the status quo for Razer, so anyone who’s purchased the company’s peripherals before has probably already decided they’re content to install whatever they need to along the way.

Razer’s software also includes the Razer Hypershift feature that allows every key to perform a secondary function–such as launching apps or running a macro–while a designated Hypershift key is held down. Note that the keyboard also allows for on-the-fly macro recording. 

This customization also extends to the volume knob and media buttons mentioned earlier. Those descriptions apply to the inputs’ default functions, but Synapse 3 can be used to customize the “multi-function roller wheel” to serve a variety of purposes, while the button next to it can be programmed just like any other key on the keyboard.

Unlike the BlackWidow V3 TKL, this version of the keyboard has on-board storage with support for up to five profiles. People who create Razer accounts can sync profiles across devices using Synapse 3.

Bottom Line

(Image credit: Tom’s Hardware)

There’s no denying that the Razer BlackWidow V3 has a strong foundation. We’ve liked the other BlackWidow V3 models we’ve reviewed, and they share a lot of similarities, so it’s not surprising we like this one as well. Objectively speaking, Razer made a quality keyboard. Although, it doesn’t exactly break the mold.

If you opt for the pink SKU, the Black Widow V3 Quartz Edition looks more unique. But you probably shouldn’t commit to it without seeing it because it can look very different from photos in real life (it’s hard to take a decent photo that captures how off-putting the keyboard looks at times). We were excited to test the Quartz Edition because we thought it’d stand out, but the pink here is washed out and marred by other cosmetic issues. 

If you’re looking for a keyboard in this price range with a striking look, the HyperX Alloy Elite 2 is worth considering, and the Thermaltake Level 20 is a juggernaut of its own. Meanwhile, the Patriot Viper V765 brings an RGB deck and is much cheaper than the BlackWidow V3 currently. 

But with a solid construction and cozy typing experience, the BlackWidow V3 is a worthy full-sized competitor, if you can find a hue you like.