Moto - Page 5 of 8

TechStage | TV-OS: strengths & weaknesses of Android TV & Co

Testing Tests overview Smartphone Huawei P Smart 2021: Budget model with room for improvement Asus Zenfone 7 Pro: Turbo smartphone with flip camera Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro in the test: Hard but slow Oneplus Nord N 03 5G in the test: galloped in price Oppo Find X2 Pro in the test: performance bargain Asus ROG Phone 3 in the test: Perfect gaming smartphone LG Wing in the test: 1.5 displays and gimbal cam Smartwatch Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 in the T est: competition for Apple? Huawei Watch GT 2 Pro in the test: Smartwatch with cross-country battery Apple Watch: Smartwatch with contract from 15 € per month Apple Buy Watch 6: All generations in the price check Skagen Falster 3 in the test: Smartwatch with Wear OS Test Huawei Watch GT 2: Noble fitness tracker in watch form Huawei Watch GT in the test: record-breaking battery life Multiroom Ikea Symfonisk in the test: Sonos loudspeakers under 100 Euro Bose Portable Home Speaker in the test: battery, WLAN, Airplay 2 Sonos Move in the test: The robust all-rounder Musiccast: Multiroom from Yamaha in the test Denon Heos in the test: Versatile multi-room system Flat soundbar Teufel Sounddeck Streaming in the test Teufel Raumfeld in the test: rich multiroom sound Keyfinder Tile Slim (2019): Key finder in credit card format Bluetooth key finder Tile Pro in the test: 122 m range! Key finder Tile Pro in the test: the range champion Orbit Bluetooth tracker in the test: looking for wallet and keys Nonda iHere 3.0: smart key finder under test Chipolo Classic and Plus: Bluetooth key finder under test Musegear finder 2: Keyfinder without registration obligation Action-Cam DJI Pocket 2 in the test: Zoom and 64 – Megapixel sensor Actioncam Insta 360 One R: 1-inch image sensor in the test Gopro Hero 8 Black in the test: Back to the top Insta 360 One R in the test: The modular action cam Motorola Moto G8 Plus Review: Great smartphone, but … Insta 360 Go: Micro-GoPro in the test Motorola One Action Test : Good hardware, bad camera microSD In the test: Kingston UHS-I U3 microSDXC Kit MicroSD card for smartphone: Samsung Evo Plus 2017 Test report: Lexar Professional 1800 x microSDXC Kit Test report: Intenso Premium microSDXC card with 64 GByte Android Sonos Move in the test: The robust all-rounder Honor 20: Inexpensive high-end smartphone in the test Xiaomi Mi 9: top technology at a bargain price Doogee S 90 in the test: modular outdoor smartphone ZTE Axon 10 Pro in the test: high-end phone at a competitive price Motorola Moto G7 Power in the test: large battery, small price Sony Xperia 10: smartphone with 21: 9 display in Test Counselor Advisor overview Purchase advice The right cordless screwdriver for the home workshop t Bargain: Which Fire TV Stick from 19 € is the right one? Purchase advice: What good is a leaf blower with a battery for 45 Euro? True wireless headphones: How much do you have to invest? Buying advice water cooling: High-end PCs cool better Adviser: Air conditioning and fan against the heat wave Sony shows the Xperia 1: Is the predecessor XZ3 worth it now? Practice Caution, money away: Kickstarter & Co. are not shops Turn off Android notifications from annoying apps Here’s how: Install the new Android L keyboard now Tip: Use “Ok Google everywhere” in Germany In the test : Will the jailbreak work for iOS 7.1? Goder ma and mobile medicine: The doctor apps are coming! Instructions: Jailbreak for iOS 7 on iPhone 5S, 5, 4S and 4 Technology Importing technology from China, part 2: Customs, taxes and tricks Drones & copters: From toys to FPV Racer What does the end of an ecosystem mean? Smartphones with a flexible display: What’s the point? Overview of smartphone processors: Everything Snapdragon? Evolutionary dead ends: the very worst cell phones mpass: Pay with the NFC mobile phone – or the NFC toilet roll Display calculator Calculate pixel density, number and display proportion Best list Test winner Price comparison Price comparison overview Smartphones from Android 7.0 Phablets with stylus Fitness tracker with GPS Bluetooth headphones with ANR Drones with GPS Video TechStage Counselor TV-OS: Strengths & weaknesses of Android TV & Co beginning Android TV Tizen OS Web OS My Home Screen Loewe OS Metz VIDAA U3.0 Conclusion Comments by Jochen // 03. 01. 2021 11: 10 Clock

Does it matter which operating system the new Smart TV has? TechStage presents the most important OS for TVs in the guide and explains where they score.

Modern smart TVs no longer only differ in terms of appearance, equipment, and picture and sound quality. An essential feature is the operating system, which is largely responsible for ease of use. While the smartphone market is dominated by Android and iOS, several operating systems are competing for flat screen televisions. We will introduce you to all the important ones and address the respective strengths and weaknesses.

The article appears in our UHD TV theme world. There were other articles published there, for example our guide for really big TVs, tips for buying a next-gen TV or our constantly updated list of the cheapest TVs from all categories (e.g. OLED, HDMI 2.1 or just huge).

Android TV Not only on smartphones, but also on smartphones TVs are very popular with Android. In addition to Sony and Philips, TCL and Metz Blue rely on Android TV from Google. Corresponding televisions can not only be set up using the remote control supplied, but optionally using an Android smartphone.

Tile-like structure, clear structure and a lot of apps: that’s Android TV. #The start page has a uniform design on almost all Android TVs: Here you can find a list of the most important apps, streaming services and TV channels. All applications are arranged in tiles on the user interface; additional applications can be added in next to no time. While Android was still a bit sluggish and unstable to use in previous versions, these teething troubles have been resolved with Android 9.0 (Pie).

The gear wheel at the top right takes you to the most important system settings, the Google Assistant is lurking at the top left, for example to browse streaming services by voice or to call up current weather information or traffic reports.

The selection of apps under Android TV is generally huge and one of the best on the market. Thanks to the Google Play Store, you will find a varied portfolio in the areas of video, music, games and news. The integrated Google Chromecast ensures flexible compatibility with smartphones. While the standard interface is identical on all Android televisions, the individual manufacturers adapt their menus for picture and sound settings individually.

Overall, Android TV scores with a clear design, high operating speed and an extensive selection of apps. Smaller weak points in terms of performance can only be found on very inexpensive or older flat-screen TVs with an Android system. It is therefore important to check every now and then whether there is an update for your own TV.

Tizen OS With Tizen, Samsung uses its own operating system; the sheer number of Samsung TVs alone makes it a major competitor to Android TV. With Tizen OS, all functions are packed into a horizontal menu bar. You can store the most important apps here, preview streaming content, switch sources, open TV recordings from USB sticks and jump to the picture and sound settings.

Tizen OS from Samsung offers a lot of information at a glance and likes it colorful. All of this succeeds quickly even if the selected Samsung television does not have the fastest processor. In contrast to its competitors Philips and Panasonic, Samsung has integrated a powerful media player into Tizen OS, which can play photos and videos as 360 Degree view. In addition, there is a function in “Ambient Mode” to display paintings, photos or infographics with news or weather data on the screen when not in use. Alternatively, this takes on the look of the wallpaper behind the flat screen TV.

Relatively new is the intelligent program guide, which combines content from television and streaming services. In terms of apps, Samsung is one of the leading manufacturers on the market. In addition to HD +, you can also find Disney +, Apple TV, DAZN, Sky Ticket, Netflix, Tidal, Amazon Music, Spotify and Deezer. Tizen OS supports Apple AirPlay 2 to stream photos, music and videos from iPhone or iPad wirelessly to the hip flask, as well as Google Chromecast and Bluetooth.

If you like control by voice, you will also get your money’s worth with Tizen OS. A recent software update makes Google Assistant available on Samsung smart TVs in addition to Bixby and Amazon Alexa. Together with WebOS from LG Tizen OS is one of the most user-friendly and versatile operating systems on the market.

Web OS LG uses the WebOS operating system in its OLED and LCD televisions, which is visually reminiscent of the keyboard of a piano. The latest version, WebOS 5.0, is extremely fast and clearly structured. The high level of operating comfort is also due to the fact that you can control a mouse pointer on the TV with the LG remote control. So you can move the so-called Magic Remote freely in the air and navigate to the desired window like with a laser pointer. This is surprisingly precise and you get used to it quickly.

LG’s WebOS provides apps and functions like on a keyboard. The individual tiles give access to the TV program, the most important apps (these are freely configurable), the home dashboard – an overview of all connected and networked devices – as well as the art gallery, the sports alarm and the fast media player for 360 – degree representations. The art gallery contains paintings, photos and drawings that transform the LG TV, including a wooden or metal frame, into a deceptively real work of art. The sports alarm provides timely information about when your favorite team is playing again, for example in football or basketball, and provides constantly updated results.

With AirPlay 2 and the support of Chromecast and Miracast, WebOS 5.0 is very communicative. The range of videos and games in the app area is plentiful, including Apple TV, Disney +, DAZN, Sky Ticket, Google Play Films, Netflix and Zattoo. However, music and news apps still have room for improvement. The already installed application “Reelgood”, a streaming guide that bundles content from Netflix, Disney +, Amazon Prime Video and Maxdome, is very useful.

LG has thought of the Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant for voice control. In terms of handling and clarity, WebOS 5.0 is currently ahead, closely followed by Samsung Tizen OS, Panasonics My Home Screen and Android TV.

My Home Screen Panasonic equips its current flat screen TVs with the My Home Screen 5.0 operating system. This is clearly laid out, almost spartan, and requires little space on a flat screen. In the horizontal bar you can find the app icons from Netflix, YouTube and the “HD +” platform as well as access to the complete range of apps and an overview of all connected devices.

My Home Screen from Panasonic is limited to the essentials and is therefore intuitive to use. The sorting of the symbols is flexible, other applications can be added. You can also assign a button on the remote control to start your favorite app with just one press of a button.

New in My Home Screen Version 5.0 is the preview of thumbnails with various cinematic content as soon as you navigate to the streaming apps from Netflix and YouTube. The Panasonic software works quickly and smoothly with barely noticeable waiting times when changing menus. In addition to a DLNA server, My Home Screen also has the TV> IP function. This allows the TV signal to be transported over the network to a television set in another room in which no programs are traditionally accessible via cable, satellite or DVB-T2.

At Panasonic, the app offer is still expandable. With Disney + and Apple TV, two industry giants are missing here. Even those who like to stream music are currently losing out with the Japanese. When it comes to voice control, Panasonic is also not up to date: Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant can only be used in conjunction with separate speakers.

Loewe OS The traditional Loewe brand, which after the takeover by the Skytech Group was able to avert its final end at the very last second, is building its high-priced television with the Loewe OS6.3 operating system. In contrast to earlier Loewe TVs, the current models are easy to operate thanks to their attractive user interface with rectangular symbols and a simple menu structure. However, you have to get used to some little things first, such as the fact that a longer press on the “Home” button leads to the picture and sound settings.

The Loewe OS is clear, but important streaming apps such as Netflix are missing. The start page gives you access to the TV recordings that land on the internal hard drive. With the apps, however, you have to do without industry giants such as Netflix. These are only accessible via a Fire TV Stick from Amazon, which Loewe makes available to its customers free of charge after registering online. All applications on the streaming stick can be accessed via the heavy Loewe remote control.

In the spring 2021 Loewe wants to significantly expand the range of apps with a new platform. Loewe OS6.3 works quickly overall, but like Panasonic only enables voice control via Amazon Alexa via separate speakers such as the Echo Dot. Multimedia files can be accessed from a smartphone or a Fritzbox, for example. Loewe OS 6.3 has caught up with the market leaders from LG, Samsung, Panasonic and the like, but cannot quite keep up in terms of appearance and comfort.

Metz While the cheaper smart TVs of the Metz Blue series are delivered with Android, some Metz televisions come with a Linux Operating system used. This offers a special feature: The user can decide for himself how complex the user interface should appear. In addition, the number of functions can be gradually adapted to your own needs (“Simple”, “Comfort”, “Expert”). The start page and the submenus are kept very factual with clear labeling, but dispense with colored frills. But you know immediately which function is where.

The Metz user interface is based on a Linux system and attaches great importance to sober objectivity. The Linux system promptly implements control commands via the remote control and works at a good speed. The heavy metal signaling device with a well-structured key arrangement has reserved three keys so that preferred functions can be freely assigned to them.

If apps are important to you, you should think twice about buying a Metz TV. Because Netflix, Disney +, Apple TV, YouTube, Rakuten TV or Amazon Prime Video are just some of the relevant applications that are not available here. You have to buy a Fire TV stick separately.

Instructions are stored in the operating system so that you can look up almost any important topic quickly if you have any questions. Bluetooth and Chromecast are supported for streaming. Overall, the Linux operating system is very tidy and quickly transparent, without setting optical highlights.

VIDAA U3. 0 At the steadily growing TV manufacturer Hisense, the operating system listens to the bulky and somewhat getting used to name VIDAA U3.0. Here memories of Android TV are immediately awakened. This is ensured by the large tiles on the user interface, which not only include apps, but also the entrances and the media player.

Reminiscent of Android, but is named VIDAA U3.0: the operating system from Hisense . The operating concept is well thought out, Hisense dispenses with a nested menu structure and also makes life easy for new customers who previously trusted a different TV brand. There is also an aluminum remote control, which is also clearly designed and has four direct selection buttons for the streaming portals Netflix, YouTube, Rakuten TV and Amazon Prime Video.

Hisense cannot keep up with the range of apps from Sony, Philips, Samsung or LG, but the most important streaming platforms are on board. Via the home network, VIDAA U3.0 allows access to multimedia files that are slumbering on a PC hard drive or a media server in the network. The media player is, however, quite simple and neither does 360 – Degree representations still zoom in on photos. Amazon Alexa can be used for voice commands via voice.

Overall, VIDAA U3.0 makes a very smooth impression, but you have to be patient when switching and starting recordings on USB Bring your hard drive. Because the remote control does not have its own record button. Rather, you first have to navigate to the TimeShift menu and from here to the record button. Top dogs like LG, Samsung and Panasonic are still ahead in the area of ease of use.

Conclusion The operating system of a TV may not seem essential at first glance. But it depends a lot on how you want to use the television in the future. Anyone who mainly watches traditional television or plays via a Blu-Ray player (guide) does not have to attach excessive weight to the TV OS. But if you use apps and streaming services, or stream video games from the cloud via a cloud service such as Shadow or Geforce Now, you should take a close look at what you are buying. Android TV is one step ahead here, and hardly any other manufacturer has app support.

The good news is that these functions can be upgraded if necessary. There are enough cheap streaming sticks, as our guide to streaming boxes shows in comparison. If you need a little more power, you should take a look at the Nvidia Shield TV (guide).

Permalink: https://techstage.de/ – 5000992

TechStage | Heart rate, sleep, training: eight fitness trackers in comparison

Testing Tests overview Smartphone Huawei P Smart 2021: Budget model with room for improvement Asus Zenfone 7 Pro: Turbo smartphone with flip camera Samsung Galaxy Xcover Pro in the test: Hard but slow Oneplus Nord N 10 5G in the test: galloped in price Oppo Find X2 Pro in the test: performance bargain Asus ROG Phone 3 in the test: Perfect gaming smartphone LG Wing in the test: 1.5 displays and gimbal cam Smartwatch Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 in Test: Competition for Apple? Huawei Watch GT 2 Pro in the test: Smartwatch with cross-country battery Apple Watch: Smartwatch with contract from 15 € per month Buy Apple Watch 6: All generations in the price check Skagen Falster 3 in the test: Smartwatch with Wear OS Test Huawei Watch GT 2: Noble fitness tracker in watch form Huawei Watch GT in the test: record-breaking battery life Multiroom Ikea Symfonisk in the test: Sonos loudspeakers under 100 Euro Bose Portable Home Speaker in the test: battery, WLAN, Airplay 2 Sonos Move in the test: The robust all-rounder Musiccast: Multiroom from Yamaha in the test Denon Heos in the test: versatile multiroom system Flat soundbar Teufel Sounddeck Streaming in the test Teufel Raumfeld in the test: rich multiroom sound Keyfinder Tile Slim (2019): Key finder in credit card format Bluetooth key finder Tile Pro in the test: 122 m range! key finder Tile Pro in the test: the range champion Orbit Bluetooth tracker in the test: looking for wallet and keys Nonda iHere 3.0: smart key finder in the test Chipolo Classic and Plus: Bluetooth key finder in the test Musegear finder 2: Keyfinder without mandatory registration Action-Cam DJI Pocket 2 in the test: Zoom and 64 – Megapixel sensor Actioncam Insta 300 One R: 1 inch image sensor in the test Gopro Hero 8 Black in the test: Back to the top Insta 360 One R in the test: The modular action cam Motorola Moto G8 Plus Review: Great smartphone, but … Insta 360 Go: Micro-GoPro in the test Motorola One Action Test: Good hardware, bad camera microSD In the test: Kingston UHS-I U3 microSDXC Kit MicroSD card for smartphone: Samsung Evo Plus 2017 Test report: Lexar Professional 1800 x microSDXC Kit Test report: Intenso Premium microSDXC – Card with 64 GByte Android Sonos Move in the test: The robust all-rounder Honor 20: Inexpensive high-end smartphone in the test Xiaomi Mi 9: cutting-edge technology for schnapps Package price Doogee S 90 in the test: modular outdoor smartphone ZTE Axon 10 Pro in the test: High-end phone at a competitive price Motorola Moto G7 Power in the test: large battery, small price Sony Xperia 10: Smartphone with 21: 9 display in the test Counselor Advisor Overview Purchase advice The right cordless screwdriver for the home workshop Bargain: Which Fire TV stick from 19 € is the right one? Purchase advice: What good is a leaf blower with a battery for 45 Euro? True wireless headphones: How much do you have to invest? Buying advice water cooling: High-end PCs cool better Adviser: Air conditioning and fan against the heat wave Sony shows the Xperia 1: Is the predecessor XZ3 worth it now? Practice Caution, money away: Kickstarter & Co. are not shops Turn off Android notifications from annoying apps Here’s how: Install the new Android L keyboard now Tip: Use “Ok Google everywhere” in Germany Im Test: Does the jailbreak work for iOS 7.1? Gode rma and mobile medicine: The doctor apps are coming! Instructions: Jailbreak for iOS 7 on iPhone 5S, 5, 4S and 4 Technology Importing technology from China, part 2: Customs, taxes and tricks Drones & copters: From toys to FPV Racer What does the end of an ecosystem mean? Smartphones with a flexible display: What’s the point? Overview of smartphone processors: Everything Snapdragon? Evolutionary dead ends: the very worst cell phones mpass: Pay with the NFC mobile phone – or the NFC toilet roll Display calculator Calculate pixel density, number and display proportion Best list Test winner Price comparison Price comparison overview Smartphones from Android 7.0 Phablets with stylus Fitness tracker with GPS Bluetooth headphones with ANR Drones with GPS Video TechStage Counselor Pulse, sleep, Training: Eight fitness trackers in comparison Beginning Fitness Training Display Apps Sleep Battery life Special features Conclusion Comments (25) by Sara // 01. 01. 2021 13: 49 Clock

Fitness trackers are available in various price categories and with a different range of functions. TechStage shows in a comparison test which device is suitable for which requirements.

If you want to buy a fitness tracker, you will find a large number of potential devices on the market that want to lure users with various features and often with low prices. We have tested numerous products in our fitness tracker theme world, all of which have an integrated pulse measurement and sleep analysis:

Fitbit Inspire 2 (test report) Fitbit Sense (test report) Amazfit Volume 5 (test report)

Xiaomi Mi Band 5 (test report) Beurer AS 99 (Review) Realme Band (test report) Fitbit Charge 4 (test report) Honor Band 5 (test report) All devices have strengths and weaknesses that we have in this comparison test weigh against each other to clarify which tracker is for which need and what customers should pay attention to when purchasing.

Fitness and pulse measurement What all trackers in our comparison test have in common are pulse measurement and step counter: The devices all measure the pulse via an optical sensor and record steps taken. The Fitbit Sense also counts the floors you climb every day. All trackers worked without any problems in the step counter test and reliably recorded the steps taken. They also all allow you to set individual daily goals using the app provided. If we have reached the daily goal, the trackers inform us about it.

The permanent pulse measurement also works reliably with all trackers: The deviations from measurements with the pulse belt were in the low single digits in any case Percentage range, whereby all trackers allow a useful long-term analysis of the heart rate. The Amazfit Band 5 and the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 also classify our pulse into different categories and indicate how much time we spent in a relaxed state, with light exertion and intense activity.

In addition to steps and pulse, all trackers also measure the calories burned during the day, but evaluate them relatively conservatively. In addition, some trackers offer an activity index that users can use to set specific goals for active minutes per day. The Amazfit Band 5 has the Personal Activity Index (PAI) for this, the Fitbit Inspire 2, the Fitbit Charge 4 and the Fitbit Sense offer a comparable function.

Training The trackers differ less in terms of training functions than in our previous comparison test. Almost all trackers have a sometimes very extensive portfolio of different sports that can be recorded with the device. Classics such as running, cycling and swimming are included here, as are yoga, cardio, weight training and sometimes more exotic candidates such as rowing on the machine or jumping rope (Amazfit Volume 5). The largest selection is offered by the Amazfit Band 5 and Xiaomi Mi Band trackers, the last one being the Fitbit Inspire 2, which only offers profiles for running, cycling, swimming, treadmill, weight lifting and interval training. The Beurer AS 90, on the other hand, falls again significantly because it is only Records sports in which steps taken can be measured. Overall, however, all other trackers cover a sufficient amount of sports so that amateur athletes should be satisfied with each of these devices.

All trackers are also waterproof and survive a trip to the swimming pool or under the shower. Some devices can also record running and cycling routes with an integrated GPS (including the Fitbit Sense and the Fitbit Charge 4). The other trackers use the GPS of the connected smartphone or measure the stride length. Even without GPS, the detection of the route length worked comparatively well with all devices – so you can also use a device without GPS if you don’t always want to take your smartphone with you. The Fitbit Sense even allows us to set the length of the lap while swimming and then counts the lanes swam. Most trackers also have training profiles for strength training, but none of them were really convincing in our test – the measurements of the individual repetitions were too imprecise.

Displays and controls Even if some manufacturers have improved the screens compared to previous models, some trackers fall significantly compared to their competition from. The devices all have a color screen, most of them with an OLED or AMOLED display, and can be operated using touch controls. This works everywhere without any problems, but the readability of the display on the Amazfit Band 5, the Fitbit Charge 4 and the Fitbit Inspire 2 leaves a lot to be desired – the screen is too dark in both cases in direct sunlight.

The Fitbit Inspire 2 also suffers from the fact that the display does not activate automatically when you touch it and we first have to press a side button before the screen appears. The Fitbit Charge 4 had a negative impact in the test when it came to touch operation because the tracker did not correctly recognize individual swipe gestures and the menus jerked.

The Fitbit Sense, Xiaomi Mi Band 5 and Honor Band 5 offer the best display, all of which convince with a sharp display and excellent brightness.

Apps Anyone of us If you want to use a tested fitness tracker, you must install an associated app on your own smartphone and create a user account. This works in all cases without any problems, but before we can use the individual devices to their full extent, we first have to click through various data protection declarations and consent menus.

If you can live with it, you will get good and clear apps for controlling the trackers across the board. All services provide intuitively operable statistics and menus with various information on collected data. The Zepp app of the Amazfit Volume 5 also has its own AI algorithm that analyzes the data and prepares its own recommendations. The Fitbit app focuses on maximum clarity and presents data from several days directly below one another, which actually promotes an overview. Beurer is apparently primarily aimed at an older target group and has therefore designed its own app to be rather simple and a bit conservative, almost old-fashioned. This also affects the overview and the rather cumbersome operation.

All trackers also allow notifications to be shown on the display. Users can set separately which apps are allowed to send such notifications in the respective smartphone app of the tracker.

Fitness tracker in comparison (2020) (9 pictures) Visually, there is little variety in the cheap fitness trackers, but inside they differ significantly.

To the fitness tracker theme world

Sleep Even if the meaningfulness of the sleep analysis of fitness trackers is still limited, show the devices we tested show long-term trends. The devices measure our pulse and, in most cases, automatically notice when we fall asleep and wake up. The respective apps show how much time we spent in which sleep phase. Fitbit trackers evaluate our sleep with a special sleep index that includes all measured sleep data and enables our sleep quality to be compared over a longer period of time.

The Xiaomi Mi Band 5 analyzes our sleep and then makes additional recommendations on how we can improve our sleep quality. Apart from the Beurer AS 90 we felt the measured data on all devices at least subjectively as credible and reliable. The Beurer AS 99 had problems with the sleep analysis: It was inaccurate Measurements of the waking phases and once the sleep tracking stopped in the middle of the night for no apparent reason. We have to work with Beurer AS 99 also activate the tracking separately before sleeping. The Beurer app then does not provide any information on the heart rate during sleep – a no-go in our opinion.

Finally, all trackers have an integrated vibration alarm clock, which always worked reliably. The Huawei Band 4 and Fitbit Inspire 2 also have a special do not disturb mode that we can activate in the tracker’s menu as required. The devices also lay comfortably on the wrist while sleeping, there were no unpleasant pressure points.

Battery life Depending on which functions we activate on the trackers and how intensively we use the individual tracking features, the battery life varies. Almost all devices in our comparison test lasted at least a week with activated notifications and regular use including training functions.

The Fitbit Sense had to lose some battery life when the GPS function was activated and it brought it with a training session including GPS per day for five days. At the bottom of the list is the Beurer AS 90 with only four days, while the front runner Amazfit Band 5 and the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 easily hold out two weeks.

The advantage of all trackers: The battery can be charged very quickly and takes a maximum of one hour. Corresponding charging cables are included with all trackers, but these differ depending on the model and rely on different connections. We didn’t notice the latter negatively in the test and we found them to be user-friendly throughout.

Particularities The individual trackers from our comparison test mostly rely on a similar look and comparable features, but most of them have Devices have a few more unique features. The Amazfit Band 5, for example, supports voice control using Amazon’s Alexa – a feature that no other tracker can offer.

The three Fitbit devices include a free year of Fitbit Premium when purchased. The service offers, among other things, training programs lasting several weeks with instruction videos, virtual competitions with other Fitbit users, mindfulness and meditation exercises, and detailed health reports. The Fitbit Sense also allows you to answer and make phone calls and can be controlled by voice.

The Mi Band 5 from Xiaomi compares our sleep data with that of other users and gives us based on it individual recommendations for our sleep hygiene, while the Honor Band 5 also measures the oxygen saturation of the user in the blood. The Beurer AS 99 and the Realme tape do not have any additional features worth mentioning.

Conclusion Although all of the fitness trackers we tested have individual strengths and weaknesses, a few clear winners and one clear loser emerge in comparison. Our overall winner is the Fitbit Sense, which with just under 122 Euro costs by far the most, but it delivers the best overall performance and provides users with an all-round carefree package. This is not only due to the excellent display, but also to the wide range of different tracking functions as well as the integrated voice and telephone control.

As the price-performance winner, the Xiaomi Mi Band 5 comes off with us, which scores with an excellent display, a very long battery life and extensive training functions. The cheap price of just under 30 Euro makes this tracker a real bargain. Almost equivalent alternatives are the Honor Band 5 and the Huawei Band 4, closely followed by the Amazfit Band 5, whose screen, however, cannot keep up with that of the competition.

We liked the Fitbit Inspire 2 less, the Compared to the Chinese competition, it offers too few features for three times the price, and the Fitbit Charge 4, whose display leaves a lot to be desired in terms of brightness and control.

The two taillights, which we currently advise against buying, are in our comparison test of the Beurer AS 99 and the Realme Band. The Beurer AS 99 suffers from an old-fashioned presentation and awkward operation – both exist it is better and cheaper with the competition. In addition, the Beurer AS does not have 99 sufficient tracking functions for athletic training. In the test, the Realme Band showed clear problems with heart rate measurement and sleep tracking, which is why we cannot make a recommendation here either.

Permalink: https://techstage.de/-4079998

Motorola Capri Plus appears on Geekbench alongside rumored Motorola Nio

About two weeks ago we reported on Motorola’s upcoming Capri smartphone (model numbers XT2127-1/XT2127-2) which appeared on several certification agencies. Now we have more intel on its more powerful counterpart dubbed Capri Plus and bearing the XT2129-3 model number as it popped up in a Geekbench listing. The new Capri series phones are expected to be part of either the Moto E or Moto G lineups.

The new Geekbench test run reveals Lenovo branding and scores of 306 points in the single-core department and 1,258 points on the multi-core test. It appears the device is powered by the Snapdragon 662 chipset and 4GB RAM while booting Android 11. German publication Technick News reports that the Capri Plus will arrive with a 90Hz display with HD+ resolution and waterdrop notch, 4/64GB and 4/128GB memory variants and a 64MP primary camera. Its also expected to pack a 13MP ultrawide sensor and a 2MP depth helper around the back.

Motorola Capri Plus Geekbench scorecard

The vanilla Capri is expected to pack a 60Hz display of HD+ resolution and will likely be powered by the Snapdragon 460 chipset. It should come in a single 4/64GB trim with a 5,000 mAh battery with 19W fast charging. We’re expecting a quad-camera setup here too but with a 48MP primary shooter next to an 8MP ultrawide lens and two 2MP sensors for macro shots and depth data.

In semi-related news, the long-expected Motorola device bearing the Nio codename and rumored to pack the Snapdragon 865 chipset and a 6.5-inch 105Hz display was also spotted in a Geekbench listing.

Motorola Nio Geekbench scorecard

The device bearing the XT2125-4 model number managed a respectable 958-point performance in the single-core test and 2,969 points on the multi-core thread. It was aided by 8GB RAM and runs Android 11. The Motorola Nio is expected to be unveiled in Q1 of 2021.

Via 1 | Via 2 (in German) | Via 3

OnePlus 9 5G – a smartphone prototype has appeared on an online auction on eBay. We got to know the specification and appearance

If, like the rest of the manufacturer’s fans, you are waiting for the launch of the OnePlus 9 5G smartphone, we have good news for you. An offer to buy a prototype model appeared on eBay, thanks to which we received an unofficial confirmation of the existing information about the device. We already know what the “number nine” will look like and what are its most important elements of the technical specification. The said copy was valued by the owner for the amount of PLN 3,000. dollars, or almost 11 thousand zlotys. Of course, the final product, which will hit the shelves, will be available at a more down-to-earth, but not necessarily low price. Let’s check exactly what information the title leak reveals.

An offer to sell a prototype OnePlus 9 5G smartphone has appeared on eBay. The owner valued it at almost 11 000 zlotys.

photo. Let’s Go Digital

Motorola Moto G 5G smartphone test – We check one of the cheapest options that allows you to enter the world of the 5G standard

Leaks in upcoming mobile devices come in many forms. Sometimes these are advanced analyst studies, supply chain reports, or unofficial positions of company employees wishing to remain anonymous. There are also less obvious situations. OnePlus 9 5G will be a good example here, which appeared on one of the online auctions on eBay. Importantly, the sale did not include full-fledged equipment, but a prototype version costing as much as 3,000. dollars. The seller indicates that they do not guarantee future software updates and the kit itself does not include accessories.

POCO M3 smartphone test – Stereo speaker power, unusual design and battery life 6000 mAh makes an impression

Thanks to the “leak”, we can talk about some features of the device in an almost official way. The equipment should receive a 6.6-inch AMOLED screen with 120 Hz image refresh rate, 5G modem, 8 GB RAM, 128 GB of data memory, support for 4K recording and main camera with a basic unit with a resolution 48 MP. The flagship Qualcomm Snapdragon processor 888 will take care of the performance. Inside, you should see a lithium-ion battery with a capacity of 4500 mAh. The producer did not respond officially and he probably won’t do it anymore, keeping us in the dark.

– Mishaal Rahman (@MishaalRahman ) December 26, 2020

Source: Android Central, Xda-Developers, eBay

Best budget phone 2020: Cheap phones for $200/£200 or less

(Pocket-lint) – Just because you want a cheap phone doesn’t mean you have to totally compromise on the available features. There are plenty of bargain phones under £/€/$200 – often so good it seems bizarre a flagship phone costs at least four times as much.

Budget phones might not have the sharpest displays or the most pristine designs, but an affordable smartphone can still be good looking, offer decent specs, a good battery life, and solid performance, while saving your wallet at the same time.

Who can argue with that? Here’s our guide to the best budget phones around. If you have a little more to spend, check out our sub-400 guide.

Pocket-lint

Motorola Moto G8

squirrel_widget_192588

There are a lot of Moto G series handsets out there, but at this price point you can’t do better than the G8.

No, it doesn’t have the best cameras going compared to some other models in the range, but for the money you still get a lot: great battery life, smooth software, ample performance (gaming is no problem), and a refined design compared to earlier equivalents too.

There’s nothing better at this price point in our view.

Moto G8 review: Affordable phones don’t come better than this

Pocket-lint

Redmi Note 9

squirrel_widget_261834

Redmi is the more affordable brand of Chinese company Xiaomi and its Note 9 offers a solid design and build for its price, coupled with enough power to do most things (despite being on a MediaTek platform), and a camera that will take a decent enough photo.

It might have software that’s a little less preferable compared to the likes of the Motorola devices on this page, but it does deliver a great battery life and it is a great budget phone that delivers a lot of performance for your money.

Redmi Note 9 review: A new affordable champion?

Pocket-lint

Nokia 5.3

squirrel_widget_271852

The Nokia 5.3 offers a great battery life, versatile camera system and a clean and always up to date software experience.

It has a cheap build compared to others on this list, the macro camera isn’t brilliant and there is some performance lag, but if you don’t have a huge budget to spend on a phone, the Nokia 5.3 will tick most of the boxes for you.

Nokia 5.3 review: Enough bang for your buck?

Pocket-lint

Motorola Moto G7 Power

squirrel_widget_147020

The Motorola Moto G7 Power delivers an outstanding battery life with a genuine two-day battery life per charge. The design isn’t as premium as the more expensive Moto G7 and G7 Plus that are part of the same family, but it has a refreshed design over the G6 models, with a notched display.

The display quality isn’t the best, nor is the camera, but the G7 Power offers great value for money. Like other Motorola handsets, the G7 Power has a clean software experience, delivering almost vanilla Android with minimal bloatware, and it offers performance that will suit many just fine.

Moto G7 Power review: Like battery? Love the Power!

Pocket-lint

Realme 5

squirrel_widget_187858

Oppo is certainly onto something with its Realme brand. This phone’s battery life is exceptional, with near two-day life; its screen is large; and its processor is ample for tasks and gaming alike.

That said – and while we can forgive the screen for not being the highest resolution at this price point – the so-called ‘quad camera’ is an oversell that you’ll need to take with a pinch of salt.

Where the Realme 5 really excels is in delivering a balanced experience for the money.

Realme 5 review: A new face among the affordable crowd

Pocket-lint

Honor 9 Lite

squirrel_widget_143570

The Honor 9 Lite offers striking looks well beyond its asking price, delivering a degree of flagship quality. It also has an 18:9 aspect ratio and it comes with dual cameras on the front and rear, as well as a well-placed fingerprint sensor and a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Battery life isn’t amazing and the touchscreen occasionally lacks responsiveness, while the camera performance isn’t the best out there, but if you want a good looking and decent performing phone that you can buy outright, without getting locked into a contract, then the Honor 9 Lite is a genuine contender.

Honor 9 Lite review: Setting a high bar for budget phones

Writing by Britta O’Boyle.

TechStage | Six sports headphones in comparison: top sound for training

Testing Tests overview Smartphone Oneplus Nord N 10 5G in the test: Gallops in price Oppo Find X2 Pro in the test: performance bargain Asus ROG Phone 3 in the test: Perfect gaming smartphone LG Wing in the test: 1.5 displays and gimbal cam Nokia 3.4 in the test: Update- Promise for little money Smartphone Realme 7 in the test: 90 Hertz at the saver price Realme 7 Pro im Test: OLED display and 64 – Watt loading Smartwatch Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 in the test: competition for Apple? Huawei Watch GT 2 Pro im Test: Smartwatch with cross-country battery Apple Watch: Smartwatch with contract from 15 € per month Buy Apple Watch 6: All generations in the price check Skagen Falster 3 in the test: Smartwatch with Wear OS Test Huawei Watch GT 2: Noble fitness tracker in watch form Huawei Watch GT in the test: record-breaking battery life Multiroom Ikea Symfonisk in the test: Sonos speakers under 100 Euro Bose Portable Home Speaker in Te st: Battery, WLAN, Airplay 2 Sonos Move in the test: The robust all-rounder Musiccast: Multiroom from Yamaha in the test Denon Heos in the test: versatile multiroom System Flat soundbar Teufel Sounddeck Streaming in the test Teufel Raumfeld in the test: rich multiroom sound Keyfinder Tile Slim (2019): key finder in Credit card format Bluetooth key finder Tile Pro in the test: 122 m range! Key finder Tile Pro in the test: the Range champion Orbit Bluetooth tracker in the test: looking for wallet and key Nonda iHere 3.0: smarter Keyfinder tested Chipolo Classic and Plus: Bluetooth keyfinder tested Musegear finder 2: Keyfinder without registration obligation Action-Cam DJI Pocket 2 in the test: Zoom and 64 – Megapixel sensor Actioncam Insta 360 One R: 1-inch image sensor in the test Gopro Hero 8 Black in the test: Back to the top Insta 360 One R in the test: The modular action cam Motorola Moto G8 Plus test: Great smartphone, but … Insta 360 Go: M icro-GoPro in the test Motorola One Action Test: good hardware, bad camera microSD In the test: Kingston UHS-I U3 microSDXC Kit MicroSD card for smartphone: Samsung Evo Plus 2017 Test report: Lexar Professional 1800 x microSDXC Kit Test report: Intenso Premium microSDXC card With 64 GByte Android Sonos Move im Test: The robust all-rounder Honor 20: Inexpensive high-end smartphone in the test Xiaomi Mi 9: Top technology at a bargain price Doogee S 85 in the test: modular outdoor smartphone ZTE Axon 10 Pro in the test: high-end phone at a competitive price Motorola Moto G7 Power in the test: large battery, small price Sony Xperia : Smartphone with 21: 9 display in the test Counselor Advisor overview Purchase advice The right cordless screwdriver for the home workshop Bargain: Which Fire TV Stick off 19 € is the right one? Purchase advice: What good is a leaf blower with a battery for 45 Euro? True -Wireless headphones: How much do you have to invest? Purchase advice water cooling: High-end PCs cool better Adviser: Air conditioning and fan against the heat wave Sony shows the Xperia 1: Is the predecessor XZ3 worth it now? Practice Caution, money away: Kickstarter & Co. are not shops Turn off Android notifications from annoying apps Here’s how: Install the new Android L keyboard now Tip: Use “Ok Google everywhere” in Germany In the test: Will the jailbreak work for iOS 7.1? Goderm a and mobile medicine: The doctor apps are coming! Instructions: Jailbreak for iOS 7 on iPhone 5S, 5, 4S and 4 Technology Importing technology from China, part 2: Customs, taxes and tricks Drones & copters: From toys to FPV Racer What does the end of an ecosystem mean? Smartphones with a flexible display: What’s the point? Overview of smartphone processors: Everything Snapdragon? Evolutionary dead ends: the very worst cell phones mpass: Pay with the NFC mobile phone – or the NFC toilet roll Display calculator Calculate pixel density, number and display proportion Best list Test winner Price comparison Price comparison overview Smartphones from Android 7.0 Phablets with stylus Fitness tracker with GPS Bluetooth headphones with ANR Drones with GPS Video TechStage Adviser Six sports headphones in comparison: sound for training Beginning Type Protection class True Wireless Sound Test winner Conclusion Comments In our comparison test we show six headphones the perfect companion for sport in our opinion are. From just under 20 Euro it starts .

Sensible headphones belong for the most athletes basic equipment. Those who are not currently doing a team sport want to have some peace and quiet while training. It goes so far that you want to be isolated from the rest of the athletes in order to concentrate on your own routine. Good headphones are tools for bringing the music from the smartphone or another player to the ear reliably and in good quality. And they differ from “normal” headphones in terms of construction. The devices for athletes have to be stable in the ear, even with jerky movements. And they should be protected against sweat or splash water.

In recent years, we have tested numerous sports headphones in a wide variety of price ranges and designs in our sports headphones theme. This ranges from classic Bluetooth headphones such as the Soundbuds Flow from Anker (test report) to the Bose Frames Tempo (test report) to the JBL Reflect Flow (test report). In this comparison test, we show which functions good sports headphones have to fulfill and why the sound is good even with inexpensive devices. To do this, we choose our current test winners, show inexpensive alternatives and present alternative concepts.

Design type Sports headphones are now mostly available as in-ear devices. They sit directly in the ear, usually held in place by special silicone wings. Compared to other designs such as over-ear or on-ear, in-ears have the advantage that you don’t sweat under the headphones. However, there are many who find the plugs uncomfortable. One option is, for example, to hold devices such as Airpods on the ear with a special silicone clip. More about this in our guide The most important accessories for Apple Airpods.

In addition to the classic forms, there are always experiments. Aftershokz is known. The company uses vibrations to transmit the sound via the skull bone into the inner ear. This works well and leaves the ears free, but the sound quality suffers especially with podcasts or audio books, as we show in the test for the Aftershokz Trekz Air (test report). The frames series from Bose relies on sunglasses with speakers in the ear hooks. This works very well with the Bose Frames Tempo sports glasses (test report).

At the same time, the advantage and disadvantage of in-ear headphones is that they are sealed off from the outside world. The JBL Reflect Flow (test report) are a good example of this. They sit so tightly in your ear that it’s easy to forget the world around you. This is great when training in a safe environment, such as bouldering or jogging in a secluded area. However, it is a problem when you are out and about in traffic. If you cycle on or next to the road, you have to be aware of the traffic around you. Yes, you can activate an ambient mode in devices such as the Reflect Flow and other in-ears, then the noises are passed through from the outside. That sounds very artificial, however. Devices such as the Bose Sport Earbuds (test report) have a better balance, but do not seal off the user so blatantly during exercise.

Comparison test sports headphones (6 pictures) The Reflect Flow from JBL are our first test winners for everyone who completely from sports want to be isolated from the outside world.

For the single test

Protection against sweat and water All headphones for Athletes should be protected against water. It is less about swimming or diving with them. Rather, it is about protection against sweat and the possibility of briefly rinsing the equipment under running water.

The protection against water is easiest to read from the IP protection class. The rule of thumb is: the higher the IPXX number, the better the headphones are protected against water. The table shows what the individual numbers mean. Our tip is that the headphones should have at least IPX2.

IPXX protection classes 1st digit Protection against contact / foreign bodies 2nd digit Protection against water 0 unprotected 0 unprotected 1 Protection against foreign bodies> 50 mm / protection against contact with the back of the hand 1 Protection against Dripping water 2 Protection against foreign bodies> 12 mm / protection against contact with the finger 2 Protection against dripping water 2.5 mm / protection against contact with tools 3 Protection against spray water 4 Protection against foreign bodies> 1 mm / protection against contact with wire 4 Protection against splash water 5 Protection against dust / protection against Touches 5 Protection against en water jets 6 dust-proof, protection against contact 6 Protection against heavy water jets 7 Protection against temporary immersion 8th Protection against permanent immersion Source: Heise.de True Wireless or Electric wire? In the last version of our comparison of sports headphones in 2018 the classic Bluetooth headphones with cables between the speakers dominated. Since then, this design has had massive competition from the true wireless approach. The headphones no longer have cables, they connect to each other and to the playback device, such as a smartphone, via Bluetooth. This technology has developed massively in recent years. Where in the past there were sometimes large audio delays, for example in movies or games, the sound can now be heard without latency. The battery life has also improved enormously. The big advantage of the in-ears is their charging cradle. With classic Bluetooth headphones, it happens again and again that they are empty when you need them. True wireless devices, on the other hand, are usually in the charging cradle and thus always have enough charge to be used for a sports session.

Sound The good news: The sound of most sports headphones, including cheap devices such as the RF-BTK – 300 by Renkforce (test report) or the Anker Soundbuds Flow (test report) is now so good that it can be used for sports without any problems. In particular, the cheap devices tend to have a strong to excessive bass. The formula expensive = good sound has long ceased to apply.

With the classic audio brands you can tell that the nuances are sometimes better. In addition, Bose or Jabra, for example, often rely on AAC as an additional codec for the transmission of lossless content. This is often lacking in cheaper headphones. If you value such content in sports, you should adjust your selection accordingly. The inexpensive headphones are also good for streaming Spotify & Co or for podcasts. We write more about the sound of the respective headphones in the linked individual tests.

Test winner and recommendations Our test winners are the Bose Sport Earbuds (test report) and the JBL Reflect Flow (test report). Both sports headphones offer a well-balanced sound, sit firmly in the ear and have enough battery power to endure even longer sports sessions. They are also both comfortable to wear. We recommend the JBL Reflect Flow to everyone who wants to completely isolate themselves during sport. They are one of the few headphones that really deserve the title “Passive Noise Cancellation”. The Bose Sport Earbuds allow more surroundings to pass through without affecting the sound quality. A good third alternative are the Jabra Active 64 t (test report ). We liked the fact that they are easy to use, are well protected against water and sweat and offer great additional features. The price has now leveled off in reasonable regions.

Among the price-performance winners, we mainly see the cheap Anker Soundbuds Flow headphones (test report) and the Renkforce RF-BTK 300 (Review). Both are protected against water (IPX4 and IPX5), well made and magnetically adhere to each other. So you can click them together in front of your body when you don’t have them in your ears.

The special mention goes to the Bose Frames Tempo (review). As with the Aftershokz Trekz Air (test report), the ears remain completely free, so you can easily see the surroundings. But the sound of the Tempo frames is significantly better than that of the bone conduction headphones. Especially with speech, such as audio books, podcasts or audio announcements from the navigation system, you can hear the tempo better with the frames. The disadvantage of the Tempo frames, however, is that they cannot be used just like that. Despite good sound and low latency, you just look stupid when you stream Netflix with it.

Conclusion Anyone who has ever got stuck with the headphone cable while doing sports knows why you should only rely on Bluetooth headphones. The good news is that the cheap devices from Anker or Renkforce in particular also deliver decent sound. For scarce 20 Euro is already available good wireless headsets.

If you want to spend more, you should use a true wireless system. Not only does not a cable get tangled in the bag, thanks to the transport box with battery, the headphones are in most cases so charged that you have enough juice for exercise.

We show even more on the subject of headphones in our individual tests in the subject world of true wireless headphones. Here, too, you can clearly see how prices have been falling in recent years. A suitable guide to this is true wireless headphones under 90 Euro in the comparison test , the guide to true wireless noise-canceling headphones, or the article on the cheapest true wireless headphones.

If you want to track your training progress properly in addition to headphones, we recommend a look at our sports watch or our tested fitness tracker.

Permalink: https: / /techstage.de/-4999059

What’s the best mid-range phone under $400/£400?

(Pocket-lint) – Choosing a new smartphone isn’t as simple as it used to be. They come in lots of different sizes, with plenty of different features and, critically, at plenty of different price points.

For some the camera is important, for others it will be battery life, or perhaps biometric login. These days it isn’t just the very best flagship smartphones that offer these features though. There’s another breed of smartphones – the mid-rangers – that offer great specs at a lower price.

Here we’ve rounded up the best devices that sit between the £/€/$200-400 mark – yes our European and American readers, we have you covered – as fully reviewed here on Pocket-lint. Want something even cheaper? Then check our best budget phones feature.

Pocket-lint

Google Pixel 4a

squirrel_widget_317382

The Google Pixel 4a has a clean and smooth software interface, coupled with the excellent Pixel camera, offering a great point-and-shoot experience.

The Pixel 4a offers plenty of power, a great display, a compact form and some great speakers. It might be too small for some and it doesn’t have the latest hardware, but for those looking for a compact phone we can’t really see why you’d need to look any further.

Google Pixel 4a review: Small but mighty

Pocket-lint

OnePlus Nord

squirrel_widget_305633

The OnePlus Nord is an excellent mid-range device. It offers a large display, 90Hz refresh rates, 5G connectivity and a great battery life.

There are more cameras than there need to be, it’s not available everywhere and the edges are a little plasticky, but what OnePlus has quite expertly done is make a phone that doesn’t leave you pining for a greater experience.

OnePlus Nord review: Who needs a pricey flagship anyway?

Pocket-lint

OnePlus Nord N10 5G

squirrel_widget_3693285

The OnePlus Nord N10 5G is a great Android device for the markets where the Nord (above) doesn’t exist.

It offers an affordable price point, smooth and reliable performance, physical fingerprint sensor and headphone jack and it comes with expandable storage.

The camera isn’t the best and the original Nord is better in most departments, but in the markets where this device is the only Nord-branded phone, it’s a well-priced, affordable Android device with few major negatives.

OnePlus Nord N10 5G review: Unsettled

Pocket-lint

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro

squirrel_widget_168098

The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a fabulous phone for its price. It has huge amounts of performance, a 3.5mm headphone jack, a solid battery and a lovely OLED display too, not to mention decent camera performance for the most part.

The MIUI software might put some off, low light camera performance isn’t brilliant and it has a fairly chunky build with no water or dust resistance, but this device has unrivalled spec for its price. In fact, it’s quite simply bonkers this phone sells for the money it does.

Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro review: Incredible value

Pocket-lint

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite

squirrel_widget_281310

The Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite offers class-leading spec for its price, a smooth experience, great OLED display and a decent battery life, as well as very capable main camera.

The quad cameras is an oversell, there’s some software bloat and the notch looks a little dated but as the market hots up to deliver a more affordable 5G phone, this Xiaomi offering is high up the scale.

Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite review: A 5G heavyweight

Pocket-lint

Motorola Moto G 5G Plus

squirrel_widget_273397

The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus isn’t just a great phone because it offers 5G future proofing. It’s a great phone for all it offers, from the excellent battery life, the big screen experience, power and super smooth hardware.

It is a little plasticky, the cameras are an oversell and there is no in-display fingerprint sensor, but otherwise there’s little within this class that can touch this Moto.

Moto G 5G Plus review: Super performance, super price

Pocket-lint

Motorolal Moto G8 Power

squirrel_widget_184710

This phone is all about battery life – that’s why it has ‘Power’ in its name. It lasts for an absolute age, comes in at the lower end of our budget, and is a surprisingly smooth handler too.

At this price point you won’t get the best cameras going, but if you want longevity and as little outlay as possible then it’s simply superb.

Moto G8 Power review: The big-battery boss

Pocket-lint

Oppo Reno 2 Z

squirrel_widget_168674

The Oppo Reno 2 Z has a clear and crisp display, a premium look and feel and a great battery life. It isn’t a flagship phone, but it gets you most of the way there for an astonishingly good price.

The finish is a little slippery and the low light images aren’t as good as the Google Pixel 4a, but the Oppo Reno 2 Z offers super fast-charging and you get an awful lot for your money, making it easily recommendable.

Oppo Reno 2 Z review: Plenty to shout about

Pocket-lint

Motorola Moto G8 Plus

squirrel_widget_168802

The Motorola Moto G8 Plus has a refined design over its predecessor with a graduated rear, a great price proposition, a responsive fingerprint sensor and an excellent battery life.

It’s camera is a little basic, albeit capable, and there is some serious competition in this market, but the Moto G8 Plus offers ample performance for its price and its problems are few and far between.

Motorola Moto G8 Plus review: Is this the affordable phone you’re looking for?

Pocket-lint

Honor 9X

squirrel_widget_171252

One of the last Huawei-made phones to come with Google Services – so no limits to access there – the 9X is one of the unsung hereos on this list in many respects.

The absence of a notch on that large screen, the eye-catching reflective design, and great battery life all make for a solid handset. However, the processor isn’t a bump over last year’s and the cameras aren’t all that. At this price, though, it’s a strong contender.

Honor 9X review: Notch-free brings the X factor?

Pocket-lint

Motorola Moto G Pro

squirrel_widget_264382

The Motorola Moto G Pro offers a stylus without the typical associated cost, a clean software experience, good battery innings, ample power and a capable main camera.

There are no decent palm rejection or pressure levels for the stylus and the additional cameras are of limited worth, but if you’re looking for a stylus in a phone and all the functionality that brings, but don’t have a big budget, the Moto G Pro is just the ticket.

Moto G Pro review: Stylus style

Pocket-lint

Samsung Galaxy A51

squirrel_widget_233718

Samsung’s flagship phones might steal the limelight, but it’s also been putting out really solid mid-range handsets this whole time, with its A series the most interesting. The A51 is the latest lower-priced star, and we’re suitably impressed. Perhaps its most impressive aspects are in design, where you could honestly be fooled into thinking it’s a premium handset.

The display is great, and while you might not have loads of power under the hood it’ll do nicely for most people. Battery life is also solid, and an under-display fingerprint scanner works well for unlocking. You even get a quad-camera setup to make sure that you can play with the big boys while shooting.

Samsung Galaxy A51 review: A mid-ranger with plenty of polish

Writing by Britta O’Boyle.

Motorola announced updates to its phones for Android 11

Unfortunately, the company did not specify the timetable in more detail in the “coming months”.

Phone manufacturers are slowly starting to activate on the Android 11 update front. Now Motorola is joining the ranks, announcing updates for its Motorola, Moto and Lenovo phones.

Motorola’s Android phones use an almost “standard” Android operating system, although its definition has become a little more obscure as Google imports its own veneers for Pixel phones. According to the company’s press release, the line is not changing, as the proposed innovations are directly a feature of the operating system itself.

Updates starting in the coming months are expected for the following phones:

Motorola Razr 2019 / 5G
Motorola Edge / +
Motorola One 5G / Action / Fusion / Fusion + / Hyper / Vision
Moto G 5G / 5G Plus / Fast / Power / Pro / Stylus
Moto G9 / Play / Plus / Power
Moto G8 / Power
Lenovo K 12 Note

Interestingly, the Motorola One Action will be left in North America without the Android 11 update, as this model was released under Android One only in Latin America and Europe (excluding Russia).

Source: Motorola

Motorola, official: here are the 23 smartphones that will receive Android 11

The US company recently released the complete list of smartphones that will receive the latest version of Android. They are 23 devices, including a Lenovo also appears. In the article the complete list

of Lorenzo Tirotta published 22 December 2020 , at 17: 01 in the Telephony channel

motorcycles Motorola

Motorola is ready to receive the pending version Android 11 on its smartphones. The US giant published yesterday, the official list of devices who will receive the latest version of Android . The list shows 23 smartphone belonging mainly to the flagship series such as Razr and Edge, at the bottom of the list we also find a Lenovo smartphone. are excluded from the update all the entries- level of the moto family e.

Here is the complete list of Motorola smartphones ready to receive Android 11

motorola razr 5G
motorola razr 2019
motorola board
motorola board +
motorola one 5G
motorola one action¹
motorola one fusion
motorola one fusion +
motorola uno iper
motorola a vision
moto g 5G
moto g 5G plus
fast g motion
moto g power
moto g pro
moto g stylus
moto g9
moto g9 play
moto g9 plus
moto g9 power
moto g8
moto g8 power
Lenovo Note K 12

“The Android OS update 11 is expected to be rolled out to these Motorola smartphones starting in the next few months, pending partner support. “ Motorola stated in the official report .

Motorola has left a further important communication to be taken into consideration with a final note :

“The information contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is intended to describe Motorola Mobility’s current plans for potential upgrades or upgrades to operating systems on its Android devices and is , therefore, subject to change. The information disclosed does not constitute a commitment or obligation to provide any product, product feature, software update or functionality, and Motorola Mobility reserves the right to change the content and timing of any product, feature product or software version. The software features and features provided by a specific version of the Android operating system may vary depending on the device and the manufacturer. ”

Android 11 on Motorola smartphones: The manufacturer has provided a full list of devices selected for the update

Motorola has announced the official, full list of smartphones selected for software updates – Android 11. In total, we are talking about 22 Motorola devices and one Lenovo hardware. The Moto e7 and Moto e7 Plus models were missing, which may be surprising. Perhaps the document prepared in advance will be updated. It would be an unpleasant surprise to abandon the support for such a fresh device in the portfolio, even if we are talking about a low-end model. On the other hand, it would not be the first such step. So let’s check which smartphones can count on a certain update and what news will be brought by the new version of the Green Robot with Motorola’s original add-on. for Android 10. Among them there are models from the razr series, Edge and moto g. The list includes as many as 22 various devices. )

Motorola Razr 5G smartphone test – impressive flap and flexible screen

Android 11 focuses on performance optimization, but does not mean that the update does not bring no visual or functional news. The software has been improved with new types of balloon notifications, the so-called “Chat Bubbles” and prioritizing messages from specific people. Controlling multimedia from the quick switch panel is now more convenient. Users of smart home systems received a special menu for conveniently controlling the smart home. The level of security measures to protect privacy has also increased.

Smartphone test Motorola Moto G 5G Plus – rival to OnePlus Nord

As you can guess, the list includes the highest models from 2020 and 2019 years such as the two generations of Motorola once, the Motorola Edge variants and almost the entire moto g9 series and part of the moto g8 series. There are no representatives of the moto e line here. Support will be given to smartphones belonging to the Android One program, i.e. devices with the so-called pure Android. We are talking about moto one action, one fusion, one fusion +, one hyper and one vision. However, we do not know the exact dates for the Android update 11.

List Motorola smartphones selected for Android update 11:

motorola razr 5G
motorola razr 2019
motorola edge
motorola edge +
motorola one 5G
motorola one action¹
motorola one fusion
motorola one fusion +
motorola one hyper
motorola one vision
moto g 5G
moto g 5G plus
moto g fast
moto g power
moto g pro
moto g stylus
moto g9
m here is g9 play
moto g9 plus
moto g9 power
moto g8
moto g8 power
Lenovo K 12 Note

Source: Motorola

Here’s the official list of Motorola phones getting Android 11

Here’s a classic “better late than never” situation – Motorola has just published the official list of devices that will be receiving the update to Android 11. It has done this today, around four months after Android 11 was initially released by Google. Make of that what you wish.

Let’s get to the list, then. Unsurprisingly to anyone following Motorola for the past few years, most of its older phones are simply left out.

Here are the models that have made the cut:

• motorola razr 5G

• motorola razr 2019

• motorola edge

• motorola edge+

• motorola one 5G

• motorola one action

• motorola one fusion

• motorola one fusion+

• motorola one hyper

• motorola one vision

• moto g 5G

• moto g 5G plus

• moto g fast

• moto g power

• moto g pro

• moto g stylus

• moto g9

• moto g9 play

• moto g9 plus

• moto g9 power

• moto g8

• moto g8 power

• Lenovo K12 Note

Motorola has a dedicated portal for upgrade information, so you can keep checking that to see when the new software is being released.

That said, according to the company, the update to Android 11 “is expected to roll out on these Motorola smartphones starting in the coming months, pending partner support”.

If things go as usual, we’d expect the higher-end models to be graced with the update first, but who knows. It would also be interesting if Motorola detailed that Lenovo K12 Note on the list, since to our best knowledge that’s not a phone that has launched anywhere yet.

Source

ZTE Axon 20 5G – The first smartphone with a selfie camera under the screen goes on sale worldwide. You order it to Poland

ZTE Axon 16 5G was introduced in September in China, but the device could not be really bought. Today its global premiere takes place, thanks to which the equipment will be able to be ordered by customers from almost all over the world. Of course, due to the US restriction on the Middle Kingdom, this model will not reach US users. The device is the first smartphone in the world to use a selfie camera placed not in the notch, not in a retractable module, but as a unit embedded in the screen. The most interesting thing is that this model can be ordered to Poland. However, it will not be easy, but as a consolation I will add that this applies to all markets.

ZTE Axon 20 5G is the world’s first smartphone with 32 MP with a selfie camera embedded in the display. The device can be ordered to Poland from the manufacturer’s official store.

Vivo X 51 5G – Smartphone test with a physical three-axis gimbal

Self-portraits or if you prefer – selfie photos are especially important today for smartphone users. Of course, it is influenced by social media through which we share with the world changes in our lives. Unfortunately, along with the shrinking frames surrounding the screens of our smartphones, there was no space for the front camera. Some solve it by using a notch or a teardrop, others opt for sliding modules or rotating modules. ZTE decided to go a step further and offered a device with a camera embedded in the screen.

ZTE Axon 20 5G, because this is the particular model, was shown in China in September, but today its global debut takes place. The equipment can be ordered to Europe, Asia and Africa. Poland is also among the countries of the Old Continent that are included in the distribution. The device itself is visually interesting, but I would be lying if I wrote that it beats the competition. ZTE, following others, implements an innovation in a device from a higher mid-price range, not in a full-fledged flagship with a high specification. So here we have a Qualcomm Snapdragon chip 765 G, Adreno 620 and 8 GB RAM and 128 GB of data memory.

ZTE Axon 20 5G – the first smartphone with a camera screen

Built-in battery with a capacity 4220 mAh can be charged with power 30 W. The smartphone does not run out of solutions such as 5G, NFC, Bluetooth 5.0, USB-C, WiFi b / g / n / ac and Android 10 with MiFavor overlay. The selfie camera is 32 MP unit embedded in 6, 92 – inch OLED screen 20, 5: 9 resolution 2460 x 1080 pixels. The main photographic unit consists of 64 MP wide angle, 8 MP ultra wide angle, 2 MP depth sensor and 2 MP macro module. The smartphone is priced at 449 Euro, that is 2030 zlotys. You have to remember that the so-called invitations are initially valid, and the number of pieces is very limited.

	ZTE Axon 20 5G	Motorola Moto G 5G
Display	6, 82 – inch OLED 20. 5: 9 60 Hz 2460 x 1080 pix	6.7 inch LTPS 20: 9 60 Hz 2400 x 1080 pix
Processor	Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 G	Snapdragon 750 G
Memory for data	128 GB	64 GB / 128 GB
RAM	8 GB	4 GB / 6 GB
Battery	4220 mAh 21 In	5000 mAh 20 In
Main camera	64 MP f.1.7 8 MP ultra wide angle f / 2.2 2 MP depth sensor 2 MP macro	32 MP f / 1.7 8 MP ultra wide angle f / 2.2 2 MP macro f / 2.4
Front camera	32 MP f / 2.0	16 MP f / 2.2
Dimensions	172, 1 x 77, 9 x 7, 89 mm	166, 1x 76, 1 x 9.9 mm
Weight	198 g	212 g
Colors	Black	Volcanic Gray, Frosted Silver
Other	Android 10, MiFavor, Bluetooth 5.0, WiFi ac	Android 10, My UX, Bluetooth 5.1, WiFi ac
Price	~ 2030 PLN	1299 PLN

Source: ZTE

TechStage | Advice: The best Fritzbox for VDSL, cables, LTE and fiber optics

Testing Tests overview Smartphone Oppo Find X2 Pro in the test: performance bargain Asus ROG Phone 3 in the test: perfect Gaming smartphone LG Wing in the test: 1.5 displays and gimbal cam Nokia 3.4 in the test: Update promise for little money Smartphone Realme 7 im Test: 90 Hertz at the saver price Realme 7 Pro in the test: OLED display and 65 – Watt loading Huawei Mate 40 Pro in the test: Great, but without Google Smartwatch Samsung Galaxy Watch 3 in the test: competition for Apple? Huawei Watch GT 2 Pro in the test: Smartwatch with cross-country battery Apple Watch: Smartwatch with contract from 15 € per month Buy Apple Watch 6: All generations in the price -Check Skagen Falster 3 in the test: Smartwatch with Wear OS Test Huawei Watch GT 2: Noble fitness tracker in watch form Huawei Watch GT in the test: Record-breaking battery life Multiroom Bose Portable Home Speaker in the test: battery, WLAN, Airplay 2 Sonos Move in the test: The robust all-rounder Musiccast: Multiroom from Yamaha in the test Denon Heos in the test: versatile multiroom system Flat soundbar Teufel Sounddeck Streaming in the test Teufel Raumfeld in the test: rich multiroom sound Technisat Digitradio 580 in the test: The gray all-rounder Keyfinder Tile Slim (2019): Key finder in credit card format Bluetooth key finder Tile Pro in the test: 120 m range! Key finder Tile Pro in the test: the range champion Orbit Bluetooth tracker in the test: looking for wallet and keys Nonda iHere 3.0: smart key finder under test Chipolo Classic and Plus: Bluetooth key finder under test Musegear finder 2: Keyfinder without registration obligation Action-Cam DJI Pocket 2 in the test: Zoom and 64 – Megapixel sensor Actioncam Insta 300 One R: 1-inch image sensor in the test Gopro Hero 8 Black in the test: Back to the top Insta 360 One R in the test: The modular Actioncam Motorola Moto G8 Plus test: Great smartphone, but … Insta 360 Go: Micro-GoPro in the test Motorola One Action Test: Good hardware, bad camera microSD In the test: Kingston UHS-I U3 microSDXC Kit MicroSD card for smartphone: Samsung Evo Plus 2017 Test report: Lexar Professional 1800 x microSDXC Kit Test report: Intenso Premium microSDXC card with 64 GByte Android Sonos Move in the test: The robust one All-rounder Honor 20: Inexpensive high-end smartphone in the test Xiaomi Mi 9: Top technology at a bargain price Doogee S 90 in the test: modular outdoor smartphone ZTE Axon 10 Pro in the test: High-end phone at a competitive price Motorola Moto G7 Power in the test: large battery, small price Sony Xperia 10: Smartphone with 21: 9 display in the test Counselor Guide overview Purchase advice Bargain: Which Fire TV Stick from 19 € is the right one? Purchase advice: What good is a leaf blower with a battery for 45 Euro? True wireless headphones: How much do you have to invest? Buying advice water cooling: High-end PCs cool better Advice: Air conditioning and fan against the heat wave Sony shows the Xperia 1: Is the previous XZ3 worth it now? Euro Practice Caution, money away: Kickstarter & Co. are not shops Android notifications from turn off annoying apps This is how it works: Install the new Android L keyboard now Tip: Use “Ok Google everywhere” in Germany In the test: Does the jailbreak work for iOS 7.1? Goderma and mobile medicine: The doctor apps are coming! Instructions: Yes ilbreak for iOS 7 on iPhone 5S, 5, 4S and 4 Technology Importing technology from China, part 2: Customs, taxes and tricks Drones & copters: From toys to FPV racers What does the end of an ecosystem mean? Smartphones with a flexible display: What’s the point? Smartphone processors at a glance: Everything Snapdragon? Evolutionary dead ends: the very worst cell phones mpass: Pay with the NFC mobile phone – or the NFC toilet roll Display calculator Calculate pixel density, number and display proportion Leaderboard Test winner Price comparison Price comparison overview Smartphones from Android 7.0 Phablets with stylus Fitness tracker with GPS Bluetooth headphones with ANR Drones with GPS Video TechStage Adviser Adviser: The best Fritzbox for VDSL, cable, LTE and fiber optics Beginning VDSL Cable LTE Glass fiber No modem Conclusion Comments by Thomas // 19. 12. 2020 10 : 00 Clock

AVM has numerous Fritzbox routers in its range. TechStage shows which router is suitable for which Internet technology and presents the advantages and disadvantages of all important models.

Long awaited, finally available: The new Fritzbox 7530 AX is the first VDSL router from AVM with the new WiFi standard WiFi-6 (11 ax). Also the Fritzbox Cable 6660 for the cable internet as well as the 5530 Fiber for the fiber optic connection work with WiFi-6. The WLAN speed is an important criterion when deciding on a Fritzbox. But the router, as a home network and switchboard at home, should simply connect all devices and bring them to the Internet. Therefore, features such as telephone, USB and LAN connections as well as the capabilities of the built-in modem are important.

In this article we examine in detail the differences between the models for VDSL , Cables, fiber optics and LTE and recommend the right Fritzbox for every network. The article appears as part of our WLAN theme world. In addition, we have already tested several Fritzbox routers and other products, such as the inexpensive Fritz Repeater 600 (test report) or the tri-band mesh repeater Fritz Repeater 3000 (Review).

Fritzbox router for VDSL The Fritzbox 7590 (test report) for around 185 Euro is the current top -Model for the VDSL connection. Your modem supports the profile 35 b for supervectoring (up to 300 MBit / s in the download), the WLAN works with the 11 AC standard and four parallel data streams . There are hardly any WLAN remote stations with a corresponding speed. But since the 7583 Mastered multi-user MIMO, it can transmit data to several clients at the same time, which is particularly advantageous in a larger WLAN network is. The Fritzbox offers a wide variety of connections 7583 Fritzbox for telephony: It supports one ISDN device, two analog devices via RJ 11 or TAE and up to six cordless telephones via DECT.

Especially in the case design, the more expensive Fritzbox differs 7580 of the 7590, because she stands upright. Otherwise it offers the same equipment, but its modem is only for vectoring connections up to 100 MBit / s suitable. More about this in our Fritzbox guide 7430, 7580 and 7590 compared.

For new models, AVM relies on the current Wi-Fi 6 standard, for example the Fritzbox 6660 Cable and the VDSL Fritzbox 7430 use AX. With 169 Euro is the new Fritzbox 7490 AX slightly cheaper than the 7590, but has fewer connections: For example, it lacks an additional WAN port to connect it For example, to connect to an Internet connection via cable or fiber optic with an upstream modem. One of the four Gigabit LAN ports must be used for this. In addition, it has no socket for an ISDN telephone and only one connection option for analogue telephone devices.

Your plus point is the future-proof WLAN standard: The advantages of WiFi-6 do pay off especially noticeable when several end devices are transmitting in the network that also support WiFi-6. The new WPA3 encryption supports the Fritzbox 7530 AX of course – but also all Fritz boxes with 11 AC- WLAN, on which at least Fritz OS 7. 20 is installed. This also applies to the Fritzbox 7530 for round 115 Euro, which apart from the WiFi like the 7530 AX : Your wireless network works with the 11 AC standard and a maximum of two parallel data streams. It is therefore recommended for smaller WLANs and if a quick switch to WiFi-6 is not planned.

Who the seven years ago presented Fritzbox 7490 does not necessarily have to switch to a more recent model. Because AVM regularly provides the veteran with the latest updates and new functions. But the router is no longer recommended for new purchases, especially since it is usually more expensive than the better equipped Fritzbox 7583.

Fritz router with VDSL modem Model Fritzbox 7590 Fritzbox 7580 Fritzbox 7530 AX Fritzbox 7530 Fritzbox 7490 Fritzbox 7430 Fritzbox 3490 Fritzbox 7583 Fritzbox 7580 Modem VDSL 2 (supervectoring , 300 Mbps) VDSL 2 (vectoring, 100 Mbps) VDSL 2 (supervectoring, 300 Mbps) VDSL 2 ( Supervectoring, 300 Mbps) VDSL 2 (vectoring, 100 Mbps) VDSL 2 (vectoring, 100 Mbps) VDSL 2 (vectoring, 100 Mbps) VDSL 2 (supervectoring: 300 Mbps, bonded: 600 Mbps), G.Fast Bonding 4 Gbps (212 MHz) VDSL 2 (supervectoring 300 Mbps); G.Fast 1 Gbps (100 MHz) WLAN: Standard / MIMO streams 11 AC / 4×4 11 AC / 4×4 Wi-Fi 6 / 3×3; 2×2 (75 MHz) 11 AC / 2×2 11 AC / 3×3 11 N / 3×3 11 AC / 3×3 11 AC / 4×4 11 AC / 3×3 WiFi speed: Mbps (5 GHz + 2.4 GHz) 1733 + 800 1733 + 800 1800 + 600 866 + 400 1300 + 450 450 1300 + 450 1733 + 800 1300 x 450 MU-MIMO Yes Yes Yes Yes no no no Telephony DECT, ISDN S0, 2 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 DECT, ISDN S0, 2 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 DECT, 1 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 DECT, 1 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 DECT, ISDN S0, 2 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 DECT, 1 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 no DECT, ISDN S0 (4 B channels; second ISDN via adapter), 2 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 DECT, ISDN S0 (4 B-channels; second ISDN via adapter), 2 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 LAN 4x Gbit LAN / 1 Gbit -WAN 4x Gbit LAN / 1 Gbit WAN 4x Gbit-LAN 4x Gbit LAN 4x Gbit-LAN 4x FE 4x Gbit-LAN 4x Gbit-LAN / 1 Gbit-WAN 4x Gbit-LAN / 1 Gbit-WAN USB 2x USB 3.0 2x USB 3.0 1x USB 2.0 1x USB 3.0 2x USB 3.0 1x USB 2.0 2x USB 3.0 2x USB 3.0 2x USB 3.0 Price 185 225 169 115 200 70 130 440 280 Technically speaking, there is also little for the Fritzbox 7430 that only 11 n-WLAN in single-band operation with 2.4 GHz and a maximum of 450 offers Mbit / s as well as only Fast Ethernet for the LAN ports. However, it only costs around 70 Euro: That’s why she can in connection with a faster Fritzbox on the Internet connection as a cheap mesh repeater, expand the WLAN and serve as an additional DECT base.

The equipment of the Fritzbox 3490 is the same for Internet (VDSL vectoring up to 100 MBit / s) and WLAN speed (11 AC over 5 GHz with 1733 Mbit / s and 11 n over 2.4 GHz with 450 Mbit / s) and the connections (4x Gigabit LAN and 2x USB 3.0) of the Fritzbox 7490. But it lacks the connections for ISDN and analog telephones and the DECT function. Anyone who calls via VoIP telephone via the LAN socket or via smartphone via WLAN can access it.

Fritzbox models for internet via cable connection As with the Fritz boxes for VDSL, the same applies to the models for the cable connection: The latest Fritz box does not offer the best equipment. For the Fritzbox 6591 Cable (test report) for around 190 Euro speaks its support for WiFi-6, especially since it in contrast to the Fritzbox 7530 AX beautiful 160 – MHz radio channels over 5 GHz supported and therefore up to 2400 Mbit / s over 5 GHz. To ensure that this speed also arrives at devices connected via LAN such as a NAS, the 6660 Cable one 2.5 Gbit connection next to the four Gigabit LAN ports.

For telephony the Fritzbox is 6591 Cable for round 235 Euro more suitable: It has an additional connection for analog telephones and a socket for an ISDN telephone. It lacks the 2.5 Gbit LAN port as well as WiFi-6. But for 11 AC it offers the maximum speed with 1733 Mbit / s and up to 800 Mbit / s over 10 n and 2.4 GHz.

Fritz router with cable modem Model Fritzbox 6660 Cable Fritzbox 6591 Cable Modem Docsis 3.1 6 Gbit / s (2×2), Euro-DOCSIS 3.0 (32 x8) Docsis 3.1 6 Gbit / s (2×2), Euro-DOCSIS 3.0 (32 x8) WLAN: Standard / MIMO streams Wi-Fi 6 / 2×2 (160 Hz) 11 AC / 4×4 WiFi speed: Mbps (5 GHz + 2.4 GHz) 2400 + 600 1733 + 800 MU-MIMO Yes Yes Telephony DECT, 1 a / b or TAE / RJ 10 DECT, ISDN S0, 2 a / b, RJ 11 or 1 TAE (2. TAE via adapter) LAN 4x Gbit LAN , 1x 2.5Gbit 4x Gbit-LAN USB 1x USB 2.0 2x USB 3.0 Price 190 235 Both cable Fritzboxes are future-proof, because their modem supports the Docsis standard 3.1, which allows Internet connections with 1 GBit / s and more. At Vodafone, for example, this standard comes off for all connections 450 Mbit / s is used, the provider is increasingly upgrading its infrastructure to it. That’s why Fritzbox models for Docsis 3.0 are like the 6590 Cable, 6490 Cable or 6430 Cable no longer recommended.

Fritzbox models for LTE The Fritzbox 6890 LTE goes through your Cat.6 modem with up to 300 Mbit / s on-line. But the router can also access the Internet via VDSL via its supervectoring-capable modem. The Gigabit WAN port can also be used to connect to an existing cable or fiber optic modem, so that the 300 Euro expensive router allows all connection types to be used. A separate tariff is required for each access, because the Fritzbox is not suitable for Telekom’s LTE-DSL hybrid offer. In terms of WLAN and telephony, their equipment largely corresponds to the VDSL and cable top models 7590 and 6591.

The Fritzbox 6850 for round 175 Euro corresponds to the equipment of the VDSL Fritzbox 7530, so offers among other things 11 AC WLAN with two parallel data streams and MU-MIMO, a connection for analog telephones in addition to the DECT function and a USB 3.0 port.

Fritz router for LTE Model Fritzbox 6890 LTE Fritzbox 6820 LTE Fritzbox 6820 LTE v3 Modem LTE Cat.6 Mini-SIM (300 Mbit / s) + VDSL (supervectoring: 300 Mbit / s); LTE band: 1,3,7,8, 20, 28, 32 LTE Cat.4 Mini-SIM (150 Mbit / s); LTE band: 1,3,5,7,8, 20, 28; 38, 40, 41 (TDD) LTE Cat.4 (150 Mbit / s) (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 32; TDD 38, 40, 41) WLAN: Standard / MIMO streams 11 AC / 4×4 11 AC / 2×2 11 N / 3×3 WiFi speed: Mbps (5 GHz + 2.4 GHz) 1733 + 800 866 + 400 450 MU-MIMO Yes Yes Telephony DECT, ISDN S0, 1xRJ 11 (adapter for TAE), 1xTAE DECT, 1 a / b (RJ 11 or TAE) – LAN 4x Gbit LAN / 1 Gbit WAN 4x Gbit-LAN 1x Gbit-LAN USB 1x USB 3.0 1x USB 3.0 – Price 290 175 120 The Fritzbox is even cheaper 6820 LTE for around 120 Euro: It does without the telephone functions and a USB connection. With WLAN it only offers 11 n with up to 450 Mbit / s. The LTE modem of the 6850 and 6820 delivers a maximum of 99 Mbit / s.

You should take a close look at the LTE Fritzboxes: AVM brings new versions onto the market without prior notice, which differ mainly through the built-in LTE modem . Currently, for example, version 2 of the Fritzbox is 6890 LTE and version 3 for the Fritzbox LTE 6820 – the version number is on the nameplate on the underside of the housing. An improved LTE modem provides a faster or more stable connection as it supports additional LTE bands and advanced carrier aggregation. However, a new version can also mean that the Fritzbox can no longer be used with tariffs from certain providers, although the model is on their compatibility list.

Fritzbox models for fiber optics and G.fast Fritz boxes for these types of connection can hardly be found in free trade. The provider usually offers them for free or for rent at the appropriate tariff. The fiber optic models Fritzbox 5530 and 5490 are like the Fritzbox 7490 fitted. The 5491 fits the connection variant GPON, which Telekom uses for its fiber optic tariffs use. For providers whose fiber optic networks are based on AON, the 5490 suitable.

Fritz router for fiber optics Model Fritzbox 5491 Fiber Fritzbox 5491 Fritzbox 5490 Modem GPON, AON GPON (Gf-TA) AON WIRELESS INTERNET ACCESS: Standard / MIMO streams Wifi-6 / 2×2 11 AC / 3×3 11 AC / 3×3 WiFi speed: Mbps (5 GHz + 2.4 GHz) 2400 + 600 1300 + 450 1300 + 450 MU-MIMO – – Telephony DECT, a / b DECT, ISDN S0, 2 a / b (RJ 11 or TAE) DECT, ISDN S0, 2 a / b or TAE / RJ 11 LAN 1x 2.5Gbit LAN; 2x Gbit LAN 4x Gbit-LAN 4x Gbit-LAN USB 2x USB 3.0 2x USB 3.0 Price 169 240 190 The Fritzbox 7583 masters VDSL with bonding: bundling two connections doubles the data rate, but the provider must support this. In addition, the 7583 on the G.fast standard: In Germany, some local providers use this for home networking via copper cables when the building is connected via fiber optics (FTTB, Fiber-to-the-Building). In the individual apartments, a bandwidth of 1 GBit / s or more is possible via telephone cable.

Fritz boxes without modem The cheapest Fritzbox models 4040 (round 70 Euro) and 4020 (round 45 Euro) are used behind the provider modem, to which they are connected via LAN cable via the WAN port. The devices in the home network brings the 4020 per 11 AC WiFi with two parallel data streams and four gigabit ports online. The 4020 only transmits via 11 n-WLAN with a maximum of 450 Mbit / s, your LAN ports only support Fast Ethernet speeds. Telephone connections and DECT capability are both missing.

Fritz router without modem Model Fritzbox 4040 Fritzbox 4020 WLAN: Standard / MIMO streams 11 AC / 2×2 11 N / 3×3 WiFi speed: Mbps ( 5 GHz + 2.4 GHz) 866 + 400 450 MU-MIMO – – LAN 4x Gbit LAN / 1 Gbit WAN 2x FE-LAN / 1 FE-WAN USB 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0 1x USB 2.0 Pr ice 70 45 Conclusion AVM offers a suitable Fritzbox for every type of connection. Choosing the right model depends on how many devices in the home network the router should bring online and which telephone connections it should have. The top models 7590 for VDSL, 6591 Cable for the cable connection and 6890 LTE for Internet via cellular nothing to be desired.

The Fritzbox 7530 AX and 6660 Cables already come with future-proof WiFi-6, but they lack the ISDN connection and another one Connection for analog devices. For smaller home networks that do not require top speed for WLAN, the cheaper variants Fritzbox 7530 for VDSL and 6850 LTE in question. Even more about the network and WLAN are featured in our WLAN theme world. For example, we test WiFi mesh systems there, including those with WiFi-6.

Permalink: https: // techstage.de/-4992716