UL Benchmarks released a new 3DMark Wild Life test for Android, iOS and Windows

The new 3DMark test includes new comparison tools as well as two different types of tests, the standard rapid test and the long-term stress test.

UL Benchmarks, known for its domestic roots, has released new blood for the 3DMark test family. The new 3DMark Wild Life is primarily designed to test the graphics chip on mobile devices, but is also available in an Unlimited version for Windows.

3DMark Wild Life is designed to measure the performance of a graphics chip in a demanding game-like environment. The test is said to take advantage of the latest technologies in modern mobile devices to render the test. For mobile devices, two versions of the test are available, Wild Life and Wild Life Stress Test.

Wild Life is a traditional, relatively short test. It is said to simulate mobile games where the stress is focused on short spins. The Wild Life Stress Test, on the other hand, spins longer and constantly simulates heavy games. The Stress Test not only gives a traditional result, but shows in a convenient graph how the performance of the device changes under longer stress, where the test is rotated several times in a row.

In addition to just the result, the new 3DMark provides easy-to-read graphs on mobile devices, where the result just run can be compared to the results run on the same devices, the results of the most popular devices, and all other results. The graphs also provide interesting device-specific data on how consistent results are given by different individuals. The data is collected from results submitted globally, so it covers a wide range of different usage environments that can affect the results. In addition, statistics are available on how the different operating system versions affect the result.

3DMark Wild Life is implemented with a Vulkan interface for Android and Windows and a Metal interface for Apple devices. The test requires at least Android 10 or iOS 13 operating system and is available for download for Android from the Google Play Store and for iOS devices from the Apple App Store. The Windows version, on the other hand, is available as a free upgrade to 3DMark Advanced and Professional Editions on Steam, the UL Benchmarks website, and the Green Man Gaming store

. Note:

UL Benchmarks has reported that due to Qualcomm’s Vulkan drivers, there are graphical errors in the test, such as flashing on Android 10 and Snapdragon

HotHardware: Android 11 slows Pixel phones in tests

Although some of the changes in test results go within the margin of error, the differences are between Android 10 and 309 at worst almost 40%.

Earlier this fall, Google released the final version of the Android 11 operating system for smartphones. Android 11 became the first to be available for the company’s own Pixel phones as well as selected models from other manufacturers.

HotHardware has noticed in its own tests that the new Android 11 will slow down at least Google’s Pixel 4 series smartphones in certain tasks. The difference is most evident in the graphics performance of the Pixel 4a, but there are also differences in Pixel 4 and they are almost invariably negative for Android 11.

In 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme, GFXBench, and Geenekch, the results are invariably negative for both Pixel 4 and Pixel 4a, while both PCMark for Android – Work 2.0 results found exceptionally positive partial results from the otherwise negative development.

In 3DMark, the overall result of Pixel 4 fell by almost 9 and the graphics score by just over 5%, but in the physics test on Android 10 the jacket came as much as , 31%. With Pixel 4a, the order of magnitude of the results was reversed: in total points the new Android came over 35 and in graphics points almost 40% , when the physics points decreased by just over 2%.

In GFXBench’s T-Rex and Manhattan tests, Pixel 4’s score dropped by about 1% on Android , but Pixel 4a’s results fell more than 27 and almost 32% in Manhattan. In Geenekch, which focuses on processor performance, Pixel 4’s single and multicore scores fell by about 6 and 14% as Pixel 4a’s scores came down by just over 3%. and you need 7%.

The PCMark tests were minor, as noted, but as noted, one positive exception was found for each. Pixel 4’s Video Editing scores rose by less than 2% and Pixel 4a’s by less than half a percent, in addition to which 4a’s Photo Editing scores rose by about 1.5%. Otherwise, the figures were also negative in PCMark. Pixel 4 scores in Photo Editing, Writing, Work 2.0 and Web Browsing decreased by

PCSpecialist Gladius i7 (RTX 3080 / i7-10700K) System Review

Luke Hill
2 days ago
Featured Tech Reviews, Gaming PC, Reviews

Nvidia’s RTX 3080 is hot on the shelves, well if you can find any shelves with it on, and PCSpecialist has updated one of their key gaming systems to include the new powerhouse graphics card. If you’re in the market for a high-end gaming pre-built, should the Core i7-10700K and RTX 3080-equipped PCSpecialist Gladius i7 be on your shopping list?

Watch via our Vimeo Channel (Below) or over on YouTube at 2160p HERE

Specifications:

    • Processor: Intel Core i7-10700K
    • Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z490-F Gaming
    • Memory: 16GB Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO 3200MHz C16 DDR4
  • Graphics Card: 10GB Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080
  • System Drive: 1TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe SSD
  • Storage Drive: 1TB Seagate Barracuda 7200 RPM 3.5” HDD
  • CPU Cooler: PCS FrostFlow 240 Series RGB AIO Cooler
  • Power Supply: Corsair RM750x 750W 80Plus Gold Fully Modular PSU
  • Case: NZXT H511 (Black)
  • Extra Case Fans: 3x Corsair LL120 RGB LED Fans + Controller Kit
  • Network Card: 802.11n 300Mbps PCIe WiFi Card
  • Operating System: Windows 10 Home

Price: £1999 inc. VAT as reviewed.

Become a Patron!

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Check Also

ASUS ROG Gladius II Core Mouse Review

If you want a medium-large ergonomic gaming mouse, this could be worth a look