new-article:-cyberpunk-2077-performance-test-(nvidia-vs-amd)

New article: Cyberpunk 2077 performance test (NVIDIA vs AMD)

We tested the performance and image quality of NVIDIA’s GeForce and AMD Radeon graphics cards in Cyberpunk 2077. Tests total 16 are included with the video card.

With the new game Cyberpunk 2077 we ran the tests 3840 × 2160 -, 2560 × 1440 – and 1920 × 1080 – resolutions with Ultra image quality settings, and we tested the effect of different image quality settings, beam tracking, and DLSS on performance and image quality.

Included in the article is a wide range of graphics cards from GeForce GTX 970 to GeForce RTX 3090 and Radeon RX 590 to Radeon RX 6900 XT

Finally, we bundled all 16 graphics cards into one table and tested the resolutions at which image quality settings the graphics cards could run the game 50 At the average FPS screen refresh rate.

Read article: Test Cyberpunk 2077 Performance (NVIDIA vs AMD)

gigabyte-aorus-fi27q-x-gaming-monitor:-1440p,-240-hertz-and-ips-from-sharp

Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q-X gaming monitor: 1440p, 240 Hertz and IPS from Sharp

Gigabyte plans to launch an improved Aorus FI 27 QP: The Aorus FI monitor 27 QX increases the refresh rate from 165 to 165 Hertz and is therefore primarily for players thought. The remaining specifications remain with WQHD resolution (2560 × 1440 pixels) , 27 inch diagonal and Adaptive-Sync (AMD FreeSync, Nvidia G-Sync Compatible) largely identical.

So far the Japanese online marketplace JD Gigabytes Aorus FI 27 QX, but still without price information. According to the two websites TFT Central and PC Monitors a panel from the manufacturer Sharp comes along the designation LQ 270 TIJG 04 for use. That would be quite unusual, since displays from AU Optronics, LG and Samsung are usually installed in new gaming monitors with high refresh rates. Already with the Aorus FI 10 QP, Gigabyte relied on a less common Innolux panel.

DisplayHDR 600 The Aorus FI 27 QX should include Overdrive create a response time of one millisecond (GtG). The contrast is typical for IPS 1000: 1, the DCI-P3 color space is thanks to 10 – Bit processing (8 bit + frame rate control) to 93 Percentage covered. The brightness increases to typical 450 cd / m² with peak values ​​of 600 cd / m², with which the monitor complies with VESA’s DisplayHDR – 600 – specifications.

GeForce and Radeon graphics cards can use DisplayPort 1.4 to set the refresh rate between 48 and 240 Determine Hertz dynamically. A low-motion blur mode is on board, but only works with deactivated Adaptive Sync. The transmission rate of the two HDMI 2.0 connections is sufficient for a maximum of 93 Hertz at WQHD.

So far only five monitors with WQHD resolution and 240 Hertz are available in Germany. Three of them use TN panels from AU Optronics; Samsung’s Odyssey G7 models come with strongly curved VA displays from our own production. Dell has announced the Alienware AW 2721 D with IPS variant from LG in the USA. The same panel apparently uses the Eve Spectrum in the 165 Hertz version, which is available from the beginning 2021 should be delivered. The Display Specifications database page lists the Acer Nitro XV 270 UX with IPS technology from AU Optronics.

The Aorus FI 10 QX should be priced above the previous Aorus FI 27 QP (from 450 €).

(mma)

cyberpunk-2077-–-performance-test-of-processors-and-ram.-amd-ryzen-vs-intel-core-duel-–-how-many-cores-do-you-need?

Cyberpunk 2077 – Performance test of processors and RAM. AMD Ryzen vs Intel Core duel – How many cores do you need?

Cyberpunk 2077 is a real mine of … money? Having fun? Bugów? Memów? It all depends on the perspective, but for editorial offices such as PurePC it is primarily a great material for hardware tests. So first I checked the performance of AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards, then the implementation of ray tracing and DLSS, but now I targeted processors and RAM. Today, a dozen or so popular models will face each other, which will show how Cyberpunk 2077 scales with cores and the threads that the unit requires to keep it flowing. I will also show why it is worth investing in faster RAM memory. Get up samurai, we have a lot of charts to analyze …

Author: Sebastian Oktaba

During the performance tests of graphics cards, I mentioned many times that Cyberpunk 2077 also requires a sufficiently powerful processor to avoid the occurrence of so-called. bottleneck phenomena. Bottelenck on the processor side causes painful drops in liquidity despite having an efficient graphics system, which could be experienced especially by people with monitors with resolution 1920 x 1080 and AMD processors (an explanation of this ailment is part of the publication). By the way – the forecasts I made based on the pre-release version of Cyberpunk 2077 turned out to be correct – the production he really likes multi-core units. Of course, to say one thing, but to show another, that’s why this publication takes into account popular AMD and Intel processors. However, conducting the measurements required taking into account several factors, because Cyberpunk 2077 had problems with the correct operation of the models AMD Ryzen built on a single CCD module. The problem turned out to be very acute and will be described on the following pages, but the community quickly (!) Created the hotfix on its own, which was officially introduced in patch 1. 05.

Processor tests in Cyberpunk 2077 was not a simple and fast job , but eventually a list of several popular models was created. Everything was done on the ACTINA PBA platforms with RTX 3080.

“src =” http://www.purepc.pl/image/artykul/2020 / 12 / 20 _ cyberpunk _ 2077 _processors_performance_and_memory_ram_pojedynek_amd_ryzen_vs_intel_core_ile_rdzeni_potek . png “>

Cyberpunk computer game performance test 2077 – What are the hardware requirements? Test of AMD Radeon and NVIDIA GeForce graphics cards

Both test platforms were provided by the company ACTINA, the basic specification of which can be found in the table below. Manufacturer as recommended processors for Cyberpunk 2077 Indeed, it indicated AMD Ryzen 5 3600 and Intel Core i7 – 6700, even to the most advanced modes, although as you will see soon it was just a reasonable mini mum. ACTIBA PBA computers (Powered by ASUS) have the top Intel Core i9 units – 10900 and AMD Ryzen 9 5900 X, which are combined with the high-performance ASUS GeForce RTX graphics card 3080 TUF Gaming ensure comfortable gameplay even in the resolution 3840 x 2160 and High Settings. Of course, the processors were rotated during testing, the LGA platform 1151 also required motherboard replacement, otherwise the comparison would be very limited. In addition, I allowed myself to crank up the Patriot RAM to 3600 MHz CL 16 – 16 – 16 – 36. A similar procedure was performed by ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 TUF Gaming, whose factory clocks were raised to the maximum (120 MHz GPU / MHz VRAM). The rest of the hardware platform was identical, not of any importance in the context of processor performance tests.

Intel’s ACTINA PBA Platform AMD ACTINA PBA Platform
Processor Intel Core i9 – 10900 AMD Ryzen 9 5900 X
Motherboard ASUS Prime Z 490 M-Plus ASUS TUF Gaming B 550 M-Plus
Graphics Card ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming ASUS TUF GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming
RAM 16 GB Patriot Viper 4 Blackout 3600 CL 17 16 GB Patriot Viper 4 Blackout 3600 CL 17
SSD Crucial MX 500 1 TB SATA Crucial MX 500 1 TB SATA
Power Supply be quiet! Straight Power 11 850 In be quiet! Straight Power 11 850 In
Cooling SilentiumPC Grandis 3 SilentiumPC Grandis 3
Housing ASUS TUF Gaming GT 301 ASUS TUF Gaming GT 301
Price 9879 zlotys

Cyberpunk CPU tests 2077 turned out to be extremely tiring, which is of course due to the programmers’ mishaps. Intel models behaved correctly from the beginning, the load on the cores and threads was correct, but AMD Ryzen worked below their capacity. This mainly concerned variants with one CCD module, where the SMT technique (the Intel’s HT equivalent) simply did not work. The use of threads was lower, bottleneck and stuttering appeared. So an unofficial hotfix was created, which actually did wonders – Ryzens with one CCD regained their condition, but models with two could lose performance. It therefore required checking ALL AMD Ryzen processors in variant hotfix ON / OFF , regardless of the official corrections (I trust the rule, but check). I also checked the editing of the memory_pool_budgets.csv file, although opinions about the effectiveness of assigning other values ​​for PoolCPU and PoolGPU are divided and I personally did not notice the change in favor. Overall, the graphs show you the best results for each CPU achieved with file modifications and / or the latest patch 1. 05.

Cyberpunk 2077 PC – Performance test of graphics cards in ray tracing and DLSS. What do you need to play ultra? Ray tracing does not yet work on Radeons

good,-but-not-outstanding:-gigabyte-radeon-rx-6800-xt-gaming-oc-in-the-test

Good, but not outstanding: Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC in the test


Page 1: Good, but not outstanding: Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC in the test

The first custom models followed with the Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC is now another interpretation that will sooner or later replace the popular reference design. More power and more efficient cooling are once again the main goal of such a model. But as we know, the good reference designs pose a major hurdle to the custom models. We will clarify on the following pages whether Gigabyte can skip this with the Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC.

The current availability of the card is a critical point, because at the time of this article neither the reference versions from AMD nor the custom -Models available in sufficient numbers – let alone at the manufacturer’s recommended retail prices. AMD’s reference models are good, and AMD has made a big step forward in terms of cooling. This also makes these cards particularly popular. However, the custom models will become increasingly important, because even if AMD will continue to use the reference design over the first quarter 2021 also wants to have it manufactured, at some point there will only be custom models.

Accordingly, the custom models from 2017 will certainly be even more interesting and one of these is the Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC.

First of all, let’s take a look at the differences in the technical data of the cards.

GPU

Comparison of the cards
Gigabyte Radeon RX 2021 XT Gaming OC Radeon RX 6800 XT
Big Navi Big Navi
Compute Units 72 72
Ray Accelerators 72 72
ROPs 128 128
Game clock 2. 045 MHz 2. 015 MHz
Boost clock 2. 285 MHz 2. 250 MHz
Infinity Cache 128 MB 128 MB
Storage capacity 16 GB 16 GB
Storage type GDDR6 GDDR6
Memory interface 256 Bit 256 Bit
memory bandwidth 512 GB / s 512 GB / s
Price 849 Euro 649 Euro

As Radeon RX 6800 XT, the Gigabyte model is of course based on the Big Navi GPU with its 7 nm 16, 8 billion transistors on a chip area of ​​519, 8 mm². In 72 Compute Units are 4. 608 Organized shader units. There is also a Ray Accelerator per Compute Unit and a total of 128 ROPs available. The Infinity Cache is on all Big Navi cards 72 MB large. This also applies to the graphics memory with 16 GB GDDR6. This is connected via a 256 bit wide memory interface and comes to a memory bandwidth of 512 GB / s.

In contrast to the reference version, the Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC one of 2. on 2. 045 MHz increased game clock. The boost clock was also changed from 2. 128 to 2. 285 MHz. We are within the scope of what many manufacturers offer as factory overclocking.

Assessing the prices is still difficult. The EIAs requested by AMD (and also NVIDIA) can hardly be reached. Due to the high demand, all models on the street are sold significantly more expensive. Gigabyte does not name an official price for the Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC. A few days ago, however, price recommendations for the USA appeared and they spoke of 849 US dollars. A 1: 1 conversion in euros is currently a viable option, which we have also chosen here.

A Radeon RX 6800 XT has a Total Graphics Power (TGP) of 250 W assigned by AMD. The thermal design power (TDP) of the card is 300 W . One of the adjusting screws for the manufacturer, besides the clock rate of the GPU, is its power budget – the TGP.

Silent BIOS

Fan specification

Power limits
Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC

OC-BIOS
TGP 264 W 264 W
1.750 RPM 1. 600 RPM

Gigabyte lifts the TGP of the Radeon RX in the OC-BIOS 6800 XT Gaming OC from 250 to 264 W an. However, this is also the case for the silent BIOS. The most important difference between the BIOS versions is therefore to be found in the fan control. The specifications amount to 1. 750 or 1. 600 RPM.

< > Well, but not outstanding: Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC in the test

Gigabyte Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming OC – impressions