the-new-mac-mini-gets-m1-chipset:-much-faster-than-the-old-intel-version,-$100-cheaper

The new Mac Mini gets M1 chipset: much faster than the old Intel version, $100 cheaper

This was unexpected – leading up to this event everyone was talking about new MacBooks, but Apple snuck in a new Mac Mini completely unnoticed. It has been two years since the Mini was last updated. That’s not too long ago, but those 8th generation Intel Core processors do feel quite old already.

But there are no Intels anymore, Apple’s petite computer is now powered by its own silicon. Yes, the new Apple M1 chipset that is also at the heart of the new MacBook Air and Pro.

Apple’s testing shows that the CPU delivers 3x the CPU performance of those old Intels. And those old chips came long before Intel stepped up its iGPU game, so Apple octa-core GPU is 6 times as fast. All told, the Mini is 5x faster than the “top-selling PC”, but don’t expect Apple to tell you which one that is.

Still, performance is increased across the board and the company’s messaging is that this can be used by programmers, game developers, music and video editors – the Mac Mini is a professional tool, not just an office computer or an HTPC.


The Mac Mini is aimed at programmers, gamers and music editors

Machine learning performance got boosted 15x, so apps can make heavy use of it. For example, Pixelmator Pro’s feature AI-based image upscaling. M1’s Neural Engine even supports the Tensorflow deep learning framework, which has so far been the exclusive domain of Nvidia (AMD GPUs do support it, but Nvidia is by far the market leader in this segment).

Anyway, unlike the MacBook Air, the Mac Mini has active cooling, allowing it to sustain its top performance for longer. And unlike the Air, you get a decent selection of ports too.

There are two USB-C ports for USB 4 and Thunderbolt (up to 40 Gbps) as well as two USB-A 3.1 Gen 2 ports (up to 10 Gbps), plus a gigabit Ethernet port (there’s Wi-Fi 6 too, if there’s no LAN cable nearby).

Additionally, there’s an HDMI 2.0 port for 4K/60Hz output and DisplayPort (over USB-C) for a single 6K/60Hz monitor. You could also have two 4k/60Hz monitors if you use both the HDMI and the DisplayPort.

The new M1-powered Mac Mini is available to pre-order now, so let’s talk price. It starts at $700 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB SSD. You can upgrade that to 16GB RAM for an extra $200 and push the storage to 2TB total (with 512GB and 1TB stops along the way). Shipping starts next week.

The Intel-powered Mac Mini lives on, by the way, only the Core i5 6-core version, which starts at $1,100. The old 4-core version has gone away (that one started at $800 and had no chance against the M1 Mini, anyway).

Source

honor-10x-lite-review

Honor 10X Lite review

Introduction

It’s a fast-paced industry, and six months sounds like a long time for a phone to go without a successor. So Honor is following up on the 9X Lite with the 10X Lite. Hardly a groundbreaking update, but the new model, which we have for review now, brings a few meaningful improvements over the 9X Lite.

Among those are a couple of extra cameras on the back – the 10X Lite now gets an ultra wide-angle module to complement the carried over 48MP main unit, and a 2MP ‘macro’ camera joins the already available depth sensor.

Another step in the right direction is switching to a USB-C port. On a semi-related note, the 10X Lite charges much faster at up to 22.5W (as opposed to the basic 10 watts of the 9X Lite), which is great because it can also hold more charge – the new battery has a 5000mAh capacity, up from 3,750mAh.

Huawei Y7a/P smart 2021 (left) next to Honor 10X Lite

That’s how the 10X Lite sits in the Honor X Lite lineage, but we should also mention that the phone is almost identical to the Huawei P smart 2021 we had over just last week, itself a differently named Y7a. If it weren’t for the rearranged cameras on the back, we’d have sworn that the Honor 10X Lite is the same phone.


Three identical phones: Honor 10X Lite • Huawei Y7a • Huawei P smart 2021

Honor 10X lite specs at a glance:

Body: 165.7×76.9×9.3mm, 206g; Colors: Icelandic Frost, Midnight Black, Emerald Green.
Display: 6.67″ IPS LCD, 1080x2400px resolution, 20:9 aspect ratio, 395ppi.
Chipset: Kirin 710A (14 nm): Octa-core (4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4×1.7 GHz Cortex-A53); Mali-G51 MP4.
Memory: 128GB 4GB RAM; microSDXC.
OS/Software: Android 10, Magic UI 3.1, no Google Play Services.
Rear camera: Wide (main): 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm, 1/2.0″, 0.8µm, PDAF; Ultra wide angle: 8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚; Macro: 2 MP, f/2.4; Depth: 2 MP, f/2.4; LED flash, HDR, panorama.
Front camera: 8 MP, f/2.0; HDR.
Video capture: Rear camera: 1080@60/30fps; Front camera: 1080p@30fps.
Battery: 5000mAh; Fast charging 22.5W.
Misc: Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass, FM radio, NFC.

Honor 10X Lite unboxing

The Honor 10X Lite arrives in a plain cardboard box, but this one has a bit more color on it than the P smart 2021’s – blue sides, a couple of pictures of the phone on top.

The box contents are the same – you get a USB-A-to-C cable and a power adapter aside from the phone. The adapter itself isn’t too shabby as it supports Huawei SuperCharge at up to 22.5 watts and will be much appreciated when having to fill up that big 5,000mAh battery.

grado-gt220

Grado GT220

Our Verdict

The GT220 have some areas of true sonic expertise, but they aren’t quite the no-brainer Grado might have wished for

For

  • Positive, unequivocal sound
  • Good battery life
  • Responsive touch controls

Against

  • Lack a little sonic refinement
  • Don’t look or feel special
  • No active noise-cancelling

We’re a little surprised Grado hasn’t found a way to make its first pair of true wireless earbuds open-backed. After all, this is a company so convinced of the benefit of the open-backed arrangement that it configured its first pair of wireless on-ear headphones in this manner. But even a brand as single-minded as Grado has had to sacrifice a principle or two in order to join the ongoing true wireless earbuds land-grab.

With the GT220, then, Grado has delivered a visually unremarkable and predictably configured pair of earbuds that go without some of the niceties (such as active noise-cancellation or a control app) and has slapped a premium price tag on them. So can such a small, unassuming product really be worth such big money? 

Comfort

(Image credit: Grado)

We’re not off to the most auspicious start. The GT220 are small and light – just 5g per earbud – but their polycarbonate housing is unyielding to the touch and doesn’t make the Grados feel like the premium product they’re priced as.

Despite following the established (and effective) ‘twist and lock’ fit template, the GT220 prove less than straightforward to get into position. There’s a choice of just three sizes of eartips in the packaging, which really isn’t enough. And even if one of these fit properly, getting the in-ears sitting comfortably and securely proves trickier than it should be.

Perseverance brings its rewards, though: once the GT220 are positioned to your satisfaction they turn out to be nice and stable. The mechanics of the fit provide a little passive noise-cancelling, too, which is doubly welcome given their lack of active noise-cancellation.

Build

(Image credit: Grado)

Grado knows what it’s doing when it comes to build quality. That polycarbonate material may not feel in any way luxurious, but it is at least hardwearing and resilient, and everything here is constructed with complete precision.

Each earbud has a capacitive touch-surface on its outer plane (beneath the big, stylised ‘G’ logo that lights up depending on what the GT220 are doing). It’s responsive and reliable, difficult to confuse, and covers every major function: play/pause, volume up/down, skip forward/backwards, answer/end/reject call, and for summoning a phone’s voice assistant. The Grados are compatible with both Siri on iPhones and Google Assistant on Android phones, and though there is only one mic in each earbud, there’s nothing wrong with either call quality or voice assistant comprehension.

Grado GT220 tech specs

(Image credit: Grado)

Bluetooth version 5.0

Battery life 6 hours + 30 hours from the charging case

Charging time 2 hours

Frequency response 20Hz-20kHz

Impedance 32 ohms

Weight 5g (each)

On the inside, the GT220 are fitted with a single 8mm polyethylene terephthalate full-range driver in each earbud. Bluetooth connectivity is via aptX, which is fine for getting high-resolution audio files on board without fuss, but we do wonder why the Grados’ premium price tag doesn’t stretch to aptX Adaptive compatibility – is no Grado owner likely to watch video content while wearing their GT220?

At least aptX Bluetooth assists in delivering quite impressive battery life numbers here. Despite their compact dimensions, the earbuds can hold up to six hours of power – and the equally compact charging case (which weighs in at just 42g) holds another five full charges. 

So, as long as you don’t thrash the volume control, a reasonable all-in figure of 36 hours between case charges is achievable. The case can be charged using either a USB-C cable or any Qi-certified wireless charging pad, and from ‘flat’ to ‘full’ it takes a couple of hours.

Sound

(Image credit: Grado)

Get the GT220 satisfactorily positioned in your ears and it doesn’t take long for them to reveal what they’re all about. Like many a pair of Grado headphones, the GT220 are absolutely unequivocal.

Once through a song as familiar as Fleetwood Mac’s You Make Loving Fun (as an MQA-powered Tidal Masters stream) is enough for the GT220 to give a reasonably full account of themselves. The overall sound is clear, detailed and completely direct. There’s an immediacy to the way they serve up the tune that sets them apart from the majority of their competitors.

The bottom of the frequency range may not have quite the impact the best of their rivals can offer, but it’s filled with information concerning texture and timbre. There’s a positivity to the way the GT220 handle the attack and decay of bass sounds that contributes no end to their overall speed.

Higher up, the midrange is treated with similar attention. Detail levels remain high – even minor transient details are picked up on and described. Clarity is impressive too, and as the GT220 establish a reasonably broad and deep presentation, a vocalist has the whole of the midrange in which to stretch out and do their thing. A listen to one as characterful as James Carr’s during Pouring Water On A Drowning Man confirms the Grados are as adept at extracting the nuance from a singer as any nominal rival – and more adept than most, at that.

But the GT220 overplay their hand a little when it comes to the top of the frequency range. We’re fans of speed and substance where treble sounds are concerned, but the Grados need a little more refinement to the way they handle the highest stuff. At some point ‘assertive’ can become ‘overconfident’, and the GT220 could do with backing off their attack just a touch. An already trebly recording such as Saint Etienne’s Only Love Can Break Your Heart can eventually become a little tiring in the Grados’ hands, especially if you’re listening at significant volume.

This high-end exuberance also contributes to their slightly disjointed way with timing. Broadly speaking, the overall sound of the GT220 hangs together pretty well – but they don’t render the momentum and drive of music with the finesse of, say, the Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 2.

Elsewhere, though, they remain an accomplished listen. Both the broad and low-level harmonic dynamics of Telemachus’ Caroline What Is Wrong With You are described in full, with a kind of casual authority. The same tune allows the GT220 to showcase their out-and-out scale and insight, too.     

Verdict

The Grado GT220 don’t look or feel particularly premium, and they go without some of the specification niceties that you might reasonably expect at this sort of money. 

They’re not the most accomplished listen where timing or top-end refinement is concerned, either. But if you like your music to sound upfront and fast, detailed and immediate, then you’ll find an awful lot to like here.

SCORES

  • Sound
  • Comfort 4
  • Build 4

MORE:

Read our guide to the best wireless earbuds

Read our Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless 2 review

Here are the best Apple AirPods alternatives 2020