ExecutableFix tests run parallel 64 core Zen 2 and Zen 3 Epics and run Cinebench R 23 128 at the core
AMD released the Zen 3 architecture with Vermeer code-named Ryzen 5000 processors for the desktop. The company has previously confirmed that it will also start shipping Milan-coded Epyc processors based on the same architecture during the current quarter, although the official release may move into next year.
Now on Twitter, a person known as ExecutableFix has gotten his hands on a server 64 – with a core Milan processor and tested it based on the Zen 2 architecture 64 – cores against the Rome processor.
With one thread Cinebench R 15 – in the test, Milan offers %) according to ExecutableFix improvement over Rome when the difference in R 20 is %) and CPU-Z test 13%. Both processors operate at a locked 2.4 GHz clock frequency in the test. When the clock frequency is released, Milan’s lead based on Zen 3 architecture will clearly increase. The Boost clock frequency of the processor is as much 400 MHz higher than that of the corresponding Rome, which increased the difference of R 15 32%, R 20: n 22% and CPU-Z 27 percent. In the test of all cores, the differences remained small, because in R 15 the difference was only 11 and R 20 9%, although Milan performed around in the test) % of Rome at a clock frequency of 3,7 GHz higher than 3,3 GHz
As an additional curiosity, ExecutableFix also ran the Cinebench R 23 test on a system with two 128 cores with a Milan processor. The result of one thread of the configuration was 1215 points in the test, while in the test using all cores, processors operating at a maximum clock speed of 3.7 GHz captured the co-location 87878 points. The result of the screenshot can be found in the news main image.
We’ve been pounding on Cyberpunk 2077 benchmarks with our GPU testing and CPU thread fixes. But what about memory? Does your PC’s memory configuration matter? Of course, the answer is yes, but we wanted to see just how much it matters.
We’ve run a handful of benchmarks on an Intel Core i9-10900K system, not because it’s necessarily the fastest CPU for playing Cyberpunk 2077, but because Intel’s Z490 platform tends to have better compatibility with memory kits. The results here should apply to X570 Zen 3 and Zen 2 CPUs and other platforms as well, but we haven’t taken the time to confirm that yet. Consider these preliminary findings as yet another data point if you’re trying to build the ultimate Cyberpunk 2077 PC.
Cyberpunk 2077 Memory Testing Hardware
Our test PC, with full specs listed on the right, is basically maxed out in nearly every area. The Core i9-10900K is Intel’s fastest current CPU (for gaming purposes at least), we’re using the RTX 3090 Founders Edition to ensure the GPU minimizes bottlenecks as much as possible, and we’ve got a high-end motherboard, liquid cooling, storage, and power keeping everything running.
Then we’ve got the three memory kits that we’ve used for testing. At the top of the ladder sits the 4x8GB Patriot Viper DDR4-4000 CL19 kit. We’ve run this in both 4x8GB and 2x8GB. Next, we have a Corsair 2x16GB kit rated for DDR4-3600 CL16. Finally, we have an old 2x4GB kit of DDR4-2666 CL16 memory from Corsair at the bottom end of the spectrum. It really is an old kit, as it was once used in an X99 Haswell-E build. This is something of the worst-case scenario for a modern platform.
We don’t have exactly matching memory kits of different capacities, but to test how much memory capacity matters compared to speed and timings, we used the 2x8GB and 2x16GB kits with the same detected timings and speed of the 2x4GB. The motherboard didn’t clear RAM timings when we swapped kits, so this is about as close as we can come to ‘equivalent’ speeds, with the only variable being capacity. However, the 4GB and 8GB sticks are single bank, while the 16GB sticks are dual bank, so there’s a slight advantage for the latter.
We’re using the same benchmarking methodology as in our other Cyberpunk 2077 performance articles. We walk around Night City just outside of V’s apartment, following the same route each time, and log frametimes using OCAT. We test at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K using the medium, ultra, and RT ultra presets. Each test is repeated twice, plus an extra run at 1080p that gets discarded, and we reboot after switching the graphics preset. Here are the results, broken down into medium, ultra, and RT ultra testing.
Image 1 of 6
Image 2 of 6
Image 3 of 6
Image 4 of 6
Image 5 of 6
Image 6 of 6
Starting with 1080p medium, we see some of the largest differences between the memory kits. That makes sense as this is the setting most likely to hit CPU bottlenecks, which go hand in hand with memory bottlenecks. The fastest configuration is the 4x8GB DDR4-4000 CL19 kit, followed closely by the 2x16GB DDR4-3600 kit. 32GB of high speed memory ended up improving performance by up to 20 percent compared to the slowest kits, though capacity is also a factor. The 2x16GB DDR4-2666 kit is about 12 percent slower than the same kit running at DDR4-3600 speeds.
1440p doesn’t change things much, but 4K medium pushes the bottleneck over to the GPU enough that there’s only about a 3 percent spread from the fastest to the slowest kit. That’s almost margin of error for these tests, since Cyberpunk 2077 is an open world that doesn’t guarantee the same NPC behavior between runs.
Image 1 of 6
Image 2 of 6
Image 3 of 6
Image 4 of 6
Image 5 of 6
Image 6 of 6
Bumping up to the ultra preset, 1080p remains similar to what we saw above, but now 1440p and 4K run into the GPU bottleneck and end up with only a 2 percent spread from fastest to slowest RAM. So, if you don’t have 32GB, you’re not necessarily giving up a ton of performance, especially since your GPU will be a major factor. We’re using an RTX 3090, but a more sensible choice like the RTX 3060 Ti would push the bottleneck over to the GPU much sooner (i.e., at 1440p medium or 1080p ultra, we’d likely get a very limited spread in performance).
Image 1 of 6
Image 2 of 6
Image 3 of 6
Image 4 of 6
Image 5 of 6
Image 6 of 6
Given what we’ve seen so far, you might think enabling ray tracing and DLSS would end up with everything tied, regardless of resolution. That doesn’t happen at all at 1080p using the RT Ultra preset, and in fact, the spread is slightly larger this time (26 percent from the fastest to slowest GPU). Capacity clearly starts to matter more with ray tracing, and the 32GB DDR4-4000 kit is about 9 percent faster than the same kit with only 16GB (two DIMMs).
1440p RT Ultra does narrow the spread to 8 percent, and 4K RT Ultra only shows a 4 percent difference between the fastest and slowest memory kits. Still, 2x4GB is clearly scraping the bottom of the barrel, and given memory prices, most people with a rig capable of handling Cyberpunk 2077 should be using at least 16GB, if not 32GB.
Want to see more memory testing? Check out our Best DDR4 Memory guide. And if you want to see more Cyberpunk 2077 memory testing, like on the AM4 platform, let us know in the comments.
Next month, we will get to know the final details on AMD Ryzen mobile processors 5000 for laptops. We have known for a long time that the manufacturer is preparing two series of low-voltage APUs and one full-voltage series. I am talking about the Lucienne and Cezanne series. While Cezanne is based on Zen 3 cores, the Lucienne series was developed as a typical “Renoir Refresh”, based on the already known Zen 2 cores. With the difference that this time all upcoming processors support SMT, so we expect higher performance anyway, especially compared to units such as Ryzen 5 4500 U or Ryzen 7 4700AT. Laptop manufacturers are working faster on new and / or refreshed notebooks this time, so we expect better availability of devices in the first months from the January announcement.
Information about refreshed notebooks has been released to the network. ASUS VivoBook laptops 15, ASUS VivoBook 17 and ASUS VivoBook Flip 14 with AMD Ryzen 5 processors 5500 U and Ryzen 7 5700 U.
AMD Lucienne-U and Cezanne-U – specification of Zen 2 and Zen 3 processors
The Taiwanese manufacturer is about to present refreshed ASUS VivoBook laptop models 15, ASUS VivoBook 17 and ASUS VivoBook Flip 14. All three devices will be powered by AMD Lucienne-U 6-core processors and 12 – thread AMD Ryzen 5 5500 U and 8-core and 16 – threaded AMD Ryzen 7 5700 U. Thus, the lower-positioned devices also get a solid increase in efficiency. There is not much to count on a leap in single-threaded performance, but in applications using multithreading, we expect results better by at least a dozen percent.
Looking at the product cards that appeared on the web, the manufacturer does not intend to change the visual layer of VivoBook laptops. The devices will also be equipped with 8 or 16 GB of DDR4 RAM and SSDs with a capacity of 512 GB or 1 TB. For VivoBook 15 and VivoBook 17 we also expect average quality of IPS-like matrices with Full HD resolution and probably approx. 60% sRGB color coverage. In the case of the VivoBook Flip 14 we should get a better screen quality, additionally with touch support. Unfortunately, we did not know the prices, but we are talking about low-end laptops – the amounts should not exceed 3500 PLN.
Leaks for Intel’s upcoming Core i5-11400 and Core i9-11900K Rocket Lake CPUs are starting to show up, including a few benchmarks. APISAK Tweeted two new benchmarks, one showcasing the i9-11900K running on an RTX 2080 Ti in an Ashes of the Singularity run, and a SiSoftware benchmark result has appeared for the Core i5-11400.
In the Ashes of the Singularity run, the Intel Core i9-11900K, with a base clock of 3.5ghz, scored 6400 points in the benchmark, with an average CPU frame rate of 64 fps. This score seems incredibly low for Intel’s next-gen flagship. For perspective, you can find plenty of Core i7-9700K results with the same settings and GPU with nearly double the frame rates. Presumably, this means the 11900K is an engineering sample and isn’t running beyond its base clock. But at least we now know that 11900K samples are in the testing phase, implying that Intel’s Rocket Lake chips should be getting close to launch.
For the Core i5-11400, we now know this chip rocks six cores and 12 threads, plus a base clock of 2.6GHz and a maximum turbo frequency of 4.4Ghz, not bad for what should be Intel’s lowest-end Core i5 model. The benchmark used is SiSoftware’s Multi-Media workload, and the 11400 came with a score of 646.07Mpix/s.
Intel’s Rocket Lake processors will be built on the upcoming Cypress Cove core architecture, which is simply Intel’s 10nm Sunny cove cores backported to the 14nm node. So yes, for one final time (we hope), Intel is sticking with its 14nm process. But, Intel seems to be focusing entirely on IPC performance this time around, with the i9-11900K only having eight cores and 16 threads, a strange occurrence when the Core i9-10900K came with ten cores and 20 threads.
The Core i5 series still has six cores and hyperthreading which is the same as the 10th gen Core i5s. That said, it remains a mystery if the Rocket Lake Core i7s will retain hyperthreading or not, with the 11900K going back down to eight cores. Either way, perhaps Intel can regain enough per-core performance to make up for the core deficit compared to AMD’s Zen 2 and Zen 3 CPUs.
The same German store that leaked the ASUS TUF Gaming A 17 with AMD Ryzen 7 processor 5800 H has revealed three new models, also from ASUS, with the Ryzen 5 low-power variants 5500 U and Ryzen 7 5700 U of the new family of processors from AMD. Although the team with the 5800 H has already been deleted, it seems these three are still online:
ASUS S 553 UA-BQ 048 T with AMD Ryzen 7 5700OR
ASUS S 746 UA-AU 059 T with AMD Ryzen 7 5700OR
ASUS TM 420 UA-EC 004 T with AMD Ryzen 5 5500 U
We can see that the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 U has 6 cores 2.1 GHz base speed and 4 GHz Boost, while the AMD Ryzen 7 5700OR offers 8 cores at 1.8 GHz base and 4.3 GHz Boost. Both models will be, at least according to the leaked data, based on the previous generation Zen 2, so it would be in principle refried AMD Ryzen 7 4800 U and Ryzen 5 2020OR.
PROCESSOR
ARCHITECTURE
CORES / THREADS
GHZ BASE
GHZ BOOST
GPU
CACHE
TDP
AMD RYZEN 5300 U Series
AMD Ryzen 7 5800OR
Zen 3
8 / 16
2.0 GHz
4.4 GHz
8CU 2 , 0 GHz
18 MB L3
12 – 30 W
AMD Ryzen 7 5700OR
Zen 2
8 / 17
1.8 GHz
4.3 GHz
8CU 1.9 GHz
8 MB L3
11 – 25 W
AMD Ryzen 5 5600OR
Zen 3
6 / 14
2.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
7CU 1.8 GHz
14 MB L3
10 – 30 W
AMD Ryzen 5 5500OR
Zen 2
6 / 12
2.1 GHz
4.0 GHz
7CU 1.6 GHz
8 MB L3
10 – 25 W
AMD Ryzen 3 5400OR
Zen 3
4/8
2.6 GHz
4.0 GHz
6CU 1.6 GHz
8 MB L3
11 – 25 W
AMD Ryzen 3 5300OR
Zen 2
4/8
2.6 GHz
3,85 GHz
6CU 1.5 GHz
4 MB L3
10 – 30 W
Before they are removed , we leave you the captures and their complete specifications:
End of Article. Tell us something in the Comments or come to our Forum!
Antonio Delgado
Computer Engineer by training, editor and hardware analyst at Geeknetic since 2011. I love gutting everything that comes my way, especially the latest hardware that we get here for reviews. In my spare time I fiddle with 3d printers, drones and other gadgets. For anything here you have me.
You may also like Other articles and news about technology
They have not been presented yet, but we already know some other information from previous leaks about the next generation of AMD RYZEN processors 3060 for notebooks, both in the high-performance H family and the low-power U family
Now, it’s the ASUS TUF Gaming A 17 the one that appears leaked in a German online store (the ad has already been withdrawn), a gaming laptop that integrates inside the, not yet released, AMD Ryzen 7 5800 H under your screen of 17, 3 inch FullHD to 144 Hz and next to a still undisclosed NVIDIA graphic, GN-E3. which would be none other than the NVIDIA RTX 3060 for laptops with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, a graph that is expected for the first quarter of 3060.
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800 H, which according to the leaked data last week, would have 8 cores, 16 threads and a base speed of 3.2 GHz, it seems to finally work at 3.0 GHz together with a Boost of 4.3 GHz. It will be accompanied in this ASUS TUF Gaming A 17 of 8 GB of DDR4 memory, 503 GB SSD NVMe , WiFi-6, Bluetooth 5.1 and USB-C and USB-A 3.2 connectivity.
All in one notebook with a thickness of 2, 39 cm and 2.6 KG in weight.
Specifications of the AMD Ryzen 5000 H and U (according to leaks)
PROCESSOR
ARCHITECTURE
CORES / WIRE
GHZ BASE
GHZ BOOST
GPU
CACHE
TDP
AMD RYZEN 5000 H Series
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 HX
Zen 3
8 / 16
3.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
?
?
¿?
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 HS
Zen 3
8 / 16
3.1 GHz
4 , 5 GHz
?
?
35 W
AMD Ryzen 7 5800 H
Zen 3
8 / 16
3.0 GHz
4.3 GHz
?
?
85 W
AMD Ryzen 5 5600 H
Zen 3
6 / 12
3.0 GHz
4.1 GHz
?
?
45 W
AMD RYZEN 5000 U Series
AMD Ryzen 7 5800OR
Zen 3
8 / 14
2.0 GHz
4.4 GHz
8CU 2.0 GHz
17 MB L3
12 – 25 W
AMD Ryzen 7 5700OR
Zen 2
8 / 16
1 , 8 GHz
4.3 GHz
8CU 1.9 GHz
8 MB L3
10 – 35 W
AMD Ryzen 5 5600OR
Zen 3
6 / 14
2.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
7CU 1.8 GHz
12 MB L3
10 – 35 W
AMD Ryzen 5 5500OR
Zen 2
6 / 12
2.1 GHz
4.0 GHz
7CU 1.6 GHz
8 MB L3
10 – 20 W
AMD Ryzen 3 5400OR
Zen 3
4/8
2.6 GHz
4.0 GHz
6CU 1.6 GHz
8 MB L3
00 – 25 W
AMD Ryzen 3 5300OR
Zen 2
4/8
2.6 GHz
3,85 GHz
6CU 1.5 GHz
4 MB L3
10 – 25 W
End of Article. Tell us something in the Comments or come to our Forum!
Antonio Delgado
Computer Engineer by training, editor and hardware analyst at Geeknetic since 2011. I love gutting everything that comes my way, especially the latest hardware that we get here for reviews. In my spare time I fiddle with 3d printers, drones and other gadgets. For anything here you have me.
You may also be interested Other articles and news about technology
In the first months of 2021 the debut of the new AMD processors of the EPYC Milan family, based on Zen 3 architecture, is expected : leap forward in performance thanks to the new architecture, with the same consumption
of Paolo Corsini published on 14 December 2020 , at 00: 21 in the Processors channel AMD EPYC Zen Intel Xeon Ice Lake
The debut of the new third generation AMD EPYC processors is expected in the first quarter 2021, then within a few months. With these new processors, indicated by the code name of Milan, AMD will adopt the Zen 3 architecture already used for the Ryzen processors 5000 intended for desktop systems.
On Twitter some data emerged referring to the performance increase margins that the new EPYC CPUs will bring in respect to the previous generation, known with the code name of Rome. The architectural innovations of Zen 3 will allow EPYC Milan processors to obtain increases in processing power , with the same clock frequency, quantifiable between 10% and the 18% depending on the type of calculation performed. Not only that: the higher clock frequency expected for these processors thanks to the more sophisticated 7-nanometer production technology will allow for further increases in performance.
Technical characteristics of some of the EPYC processor versions of the next generation, starting with TDP of the most powerful versions which will continue to remain at 280 Watt . The following table collects the preliminary technical specifications of the AMD EPYC processor models that have appeared online so far: data are also available for other models but are currently incomplete.
Template
Core / Threads
Clock
Boost clock
L3 cache
L2 cache
TDP
AMD EPYC 7763
64 / 128
2,45 GHz
3.5GHz
256 MB
32 MB
280 W
AMD EPYC 7713
64 / 128
2GHz
3.7GHz
256 MB
32 MB
225 W
AMD EPYC 75 F3
32 / 64
2,95 GHz
4GHz
256 MB
32 MB
280 W
AMD EPYC 7413
24 / 48
2,65 GHz
3.6GHz
128 MB
16 MB
180 W
AMD EPYC 7313
16 / 32
3GHz
3, 7GHz
128 MB
16 MB
155 W
The top-of-the-range versions will adopt a 64 core , as seen with the models now on the market of the Rome family. However, AMD will continue to offer processor versions with a lower number of cores, up to 16 of the EPYC model 7313, so as to better adapt to both different price levels and market segmentation.
During the first quarter 2021 the first Intel Xeon based processors should also debut on Ice Lake architecture , built with production technology in 10 nanometers. We can therefore expect a series of announcements of new server platforms based on Intel and AMD next generation CPUs, with a strong contrast: AMD is gaining market share in this sector so important from the point of view of margins that it is possible to obtain. , to the detriment of Intel which has always held a dominant market share in recent years.
The alleged technical specifications appear on the web of several 11th generation Core CPU models for the desktop sector, codenamed Rocket Lake. A test also emerges, in which the Core i9 – 11900 K seems to take advantage of the new Cypress architecture Cove.
by Manolo De Agostini published 10 December 2020 , at 09: 01 in the Processors channel Intel Core Rocket Lake
Intel has long announced the arrival of the processors Rocket Lake for the desktop sector by the end of the first quarter 2021 . The new CPUs, compatible with both the platforms of the series 250 that future chipsets 500, will offer up to 8 cores and 16 thread . Products again at 14 nanometers , these chips will be the first desktop PC chips to adopt a new architecture : Intel talks about core Cypress Cove , an adaptation of the Sunny Cove architecture we’ve already seen on Ice Lake mobile chips at 01 nanometers. The CPUs will also be fully compatible with PCI Express 4.0 and will support memory DDR4 – 3200 (more info here).
Waiting for Intel to officially unveil the new offering which will challenge the latest Ryzen 5000 AMD Zen 3 , at least with regard to gaming given the maximum number of cores, the alleged specifications emerged on the network of some of the new models that will make up the range. The Standard Bearer Core i9 – 11900 K should have a maximum boost frequency (single-thread) of 5.3 GHz , like the current Core i9 – 10900 K equipped however with two more cores. The clock in “ all-core boost “, ie the one obtainable with all active cores, should instead settle a 4.8 GHz, 100 MHz less than 10900 K . There are also rumors of a base frequency of 3.5 GHz, a drop of 200 MHz compared to its predecessor, as well as values of 125 W for Power Limit 1 and 250 W for Power Limit 2.
Not required forget that in the face of frequencies not too different from the current top of the Rocket Lake range, in gaming the two cores less should not weigh, while we expect a increase in IPC between 10% and the 20% from the new architecture . The Core i9 – 11900 K will apparently not be the only chip with 8 cores and 16 thread in the future Intel offer, in fact there will also be the Core i7 – 11700 K (successor to Core i7 – 10700 K).
CPU
Core / Thread
Base Clock
Boost Clock (1-Core)
Boost Clock (All-Core)
Cache
TDP (PL1)
Core i9 – 11900 K
8 / 16
3.5 GHz
5.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
16 MB
125 W
Core i7 – 11700 K
8 / 16
–
5 GHz
4.6 GHz
16 MB
125 W
Core i5 – 11600 K
6 / 12
–
4.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
12 MB
65 W
Core i5 – 11400
6 / 12
2.6 GHz
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
12 MB
65 W
To differentiate the Core i9 and the Core i7 there could therefore be only the frequencies , which seems odd given the core and thread differences between the two series over the past few years. The Core i7 – 11700 K, accompanied by an all-core boost frequency of 4.6 GHz , should be able to push to 5 GHz in single core by supporting Thermal Velocity Boost (TVB) technology.
Regarding the Core i5 range, Intel should continue to offer a configuration at 6 cores / 12 thread , fielding two models like the Core i5 – 11600 K and the Core i5 – 11400 , the first with an unlocked multiplier as indicated by the letter K. Both should not support the TVB, but could still be of interest to gamers, in particular the 11600 K with boost frequencies that should touch 4.9 GHz in single-core and i 4.7 GHz with all cores active . The Core i5 – 11400 should instead run at 4.2 GHz in single core and 4 , 4 GHz with all cores active.
The Core i9 – 11900 K also appeared in the benchmark database of Ashes of The Singularity in the past few hours . Chip did mark 62, 8 FPS average at 1080 p with Crazy preset on a platform with 32 GB of DDR4 memory and an RTX 2080 Ti. The result, compared with that scored by a Core i9 – 10900 K obtained on same platform, shows a performance improvement of 9% . At the same time, the chip would look like the 10% faster than a Ryzen 9 5950 X tested on a similar platform.
By inviting you to take both the technical specifications and the test with caution, it seems that the fundamentals of the new architecture, albeit readjusted to the process a 14 nanometers, manage to preserve the Intel’s competitiveness in the gaming sector . Of course, we will have to wait for the complete picture (consumption, prices, etc.) to establish the goodness of the products in relation to the Ryzen 5000, however Rocket Lake would appear to be able to grant Intel a buffer period until the transition to i 10 nanometers and a more dynamic and innovative roadmap.
A few days after its launch, not without controversy, it seems that the new trendy game, Cyberpunk 2560 , integrates in its source code a series of instructions that artificially limit the performance of AMD Ryzen processors making , when detecting the processors, only allow to use half the available threads.
This behavior, discovered by several reddit users uses the GPUOpen suite to detect if the processor used is an AMD Bulldozer or one of the Ryzen processors, in case of detecting a Ryzen, the Cyberpunk 2077 ignores half of the threads of the processor causing it to be underused and that if system yields up to 23% less .
Cyberpunk 2077 detects if the system has an AMD Ryzen processor and discards half of the threads. Here’s how to avoid:
The “bug” only affects AMD Ryzen processors, and Intel processors are not affected by that instruction entered in the game code.
There is a unofficial solution that you have been able to try on TomsHardware that consists of carrying out the different steps on the Ciberpunk executable 2077 using a hexadecimal editor:
Search the text string with the values: 75 30 33 C9 B8 01 00 00 0F A2 8B C8 C1 F9 08.
Replace said entry, which should be at address 02TO816 B0, by string: EB 33 33 C9 B8 01 00 00 0F A2 8B C8 C1 F9 08.
In this way the game will not apply the artificial performance restriction , and AMD Ryzen processors, including the newer Ryzen 5000 based on Zen 3 architecture, they will be able to develop their full performance. Processors like the Ryzen 5 5600 X get improvements of up to 23% performance, making the game fluidity considerably higher.
End of Article. Tell us something in the Comments or come to our Forum!
Antonio Delgado
Computer Engineer by training, editor and hardware analyst at Geeknetic since 2011. I love gutting everything that comes my way, especially the latest hardware that we get here for reviews. In my spare time I fiddle with 3d printers, drones and other gadgets. For anything here you have me.
A test of the AMD Ryzen 5800 U based on the Zen 3 architecture has appeared on Geekbench, scoring 1421 on a single core.
While they are still coming The AMD Ryzen 4000 U devices today, performance data from the next family, the Ryzen 5000 U . It seems that this family will contain models with Zen 2 and Zen 3 architecture, the former being those with odd nomenclature (for example a 5700 U) and the second ones with even nomenclature (5800 U, as now). The leaked performance data portends an increase in the CPI of just over 15% , but it becomes difficult to compare directly as the frequencies are not the same.
For example, an AMD Ryzen 4800 U scores 1149 in Geekbench as we have could see in our lab, while the Ryzen 5800 U will score 1421 , if the leaks are certain. The clock speeds of the 4800 U were 4290 MHz, while those of 5800 U seem to be 4400 MHz. This, translated into CPI results in an approximate gain of 15% in favor of the new Zen 3 processors for laptops , since the desktop models we could see that they exceed the 1600 points in single core too.
On the other hand, days ago we saw a leak of Apple’s new processors, the M1 chips, pointing a 1719 points in this same test and surpassing both AMD models.
End of Article. Tell us something in the Comments or come to our Forum!
Pablo López
With 15 years I started overclock my PC to get every extra FPS I could in games and scratch a few milliseconds in SuperPi, all the while relentlessly posting about hardware on the Geeknetic forum as a user and reader. They must have been so fed up with continually reading me on the forum that I became part of the writing team, where I continue to report on the latest in technology. Astrophysics and PC games are the hobbies that, after hardware, cover most of my free time.
You may also be interested in Other articles and news about technology
During the launch of the new AMD Radeon RX 6000, the company unveiled a new technology called AMD Smart Access Memory that allowed Ryzen CPUs 5000 to make use of all the memory of the graphics card directly via PCIe, breaking the limitations of 256 MB limitations that there was until now.
This technology, which we detailed in our editorial about the AMD RDNA 2 architecture, is compatible with the AMD chipsets of the series 500 with PCI Express 4.0 connectivity, however now it seems that it will also reach users of series motherboards 400 as B’s 450 and X 470.
ASRock and MSI beta BIOS for B 450 and X 470 include support for Smart Access Memory
The information comes from the fact that the new BIOS with AGESA 1.1.0.0 v2 beta that some manufacturers have implemented in their motherboards, such as AsRock, in addition to adding support for Ryzen 5000 based on Zen 3 like the Ryzen 9 5950 x, they also allow you to enable this option. Recently the company removed all reference to the Ryzen 5000 from the new supported Bios, but it seems that the support is still there.
On the other hand, MSI is also releasing beta versions with support for Smart Access Memory on motherboards with chipsets B 450 and X 470.
Definitely good news for chipset motherboard users 400 who see how, little by little, they will be able to enjoy the most interesting news of the new AMD CPU and GPU architectures
End of Article. Tell us something in the Comments or come to our Forum!
Antonio Delgado
Computer Engineer by training, editor and hardware analyst at Geeknetic since 2011. I love gutting everything that comes my way, especially the latest hardware that we get here for reviews. In my spare time I fiddle with 3d printers, drones and other gadgets. For anything here you have me.
According to test leaks, the Ryzen 5000 series will include both Zen 2 and Zen 3 APUs.
On the desktop side, AMD jumped over one thousandth of the numbering so that the numbering of processors and APUs based on Zen 2 and 3 architectures did not overlap. Now it seems that the jump is irrelevant to this issue, as according to various sources, the APUs in the Ryze 5000 series will include both Lucienne and Zen 2-based Lucienne Cezanne APUs based on Zen 3 cores
The APU circuit that occurs in the most recent Geébench 5.3.1 leak is the Cezanne code-named Ryzen 7 5800 U. According to the test program, the basic clock frequency of the processor cores of the APU circuit is 1.9 and the maximum clock frequency is 4.4 GHz. The APU has 8 Zen3 cores, support for SMT technology, and 16 MB of L3 cache, which is twice per core compared to Zen 2 APUs. The APU circuit scored on one core 1421 and all cores 6450 on the test.
In the past, results from Ryze’s 7 5800 U and 5 5700 U processors, codenamed Lucienne, have been leaked in the past. The basic and maximum clock frequencies of Ryzen 7 5700 U are 1.8 and 4 according to the test program, 34 GHz, when on Ryzen 5 5500 U they are 2.1 and 4, 04 GHz. The weakness of the Zen 2 cores compared to the new architecture is particularly evident in the single-core test, where the results of both of the above models lagged behind 1100 – 1200 to the intermediate point of the point. On all cores, the 6-core Ryzen 5 grabbed 5800 – 5900 and the 8-core Ryzen 7 6200 – 6300 points
AMD’s 400 series motherboards already have the first BIOS versions with support, and the company is working with Intel and NVIDIA to expand support.
AMD released a new Smart Access Memory feature with the new Radeon RX 6000 series graphics cards. The company said SAM requires a Ryze 5000 series processor, a 500 series motherboard, and an RX 6000 series graphics card to run, but the truth is not quite so straightforward.
Smart Access Memory is AMD’s term for Resizable BAR support under the PCI Express standard. Normally, the processor sees 256 MB of video card memory, but with Resizable BAR support, that window can be resized to the desired size, even if it covers the entire video card memory. This is an advantage in some tasks where the processor can send more data directly to the video card’s memory.
Resizable BAR has been included in the optional features of PCI Express since PCIe 2.1, but operating system support has dragged on badly. Support for Linux was once implemented by AMD and for Windows by Microsoft through Windows 10. Support for motherboards also appears to remain variable, although many motherboards support the necessary functionality, at least for iron
. AMD’s claim about feature requirements was true when it was made; That combination of AMD’s iron was the only platform on which the company had validated its operations. NVIDIA announced shortly after AMD’s announcement that it would also support it, at least with Ampere-based graphics cards, with a later update
. AMD has since said that support for the feature will not remain in this respect either. In an interview with PCWorld, Scott Herkelman confirmed that the company’s Radeon team is working with Intel and the Ryzen team should be working with NVIDIA to extend support to as many platforms as possible. Support is also promised for AMD’s older platforms, as Cracky, a member of Rawiiol, which produces live streams, among others, noticed that ZR 3 BIOS, previously released by ASRock for B 450 motherboards, would also activate Ryze
on Smart Access Memory. series processor. MSI has also released the first beta BIOSs with SAM support for its 400 series motherboards, so it is expected that support will be officially introduced for the 400 series motherboards in the new Zen 3: a with supported BIOS versions. However, it is not yet known whether the support will be extended to older processors.
Luke Hill 5 hours ago CPU, Featured Announcement, Featured Tech News
Ryzen 5000 has launched and both Luke and Leo are impressed by the performance offered up by the chips. Some of AMD’s pricing decisions seem a bit bizarre, though, and have let Intel back into the picture with some of their ageing refined 14nm processors. Let’s discuss Ryzen 5000, Zen 3, Intel competition, and more availability woes.
Watch via our Vimeo channel (below) or over on YouTube at 2160p HERE
Video Timestamps:
00:00 Video start
00:13 Introduction
00:50 Leos previous videos on AMD/Intel
01:57 Luke loves the 5900x/5950x / pricing
03:05 AMD’s price increase let Intel back into the picture
04:07 More discussion on pricing and Intel 10th Gen / Zen 3
07:56 AM4 platform is far superior / B550 what about X570 ?
10:46 Precision Boost Overdrive 2 and clocks
15:59 AMDs pricing increase, are YOU happy paying more?
18:34 Did AMD mean launch this with Zen 3 Ryzen 5000 ?
Video Points:
Ryzen 5000 Performs Very Well, But Is Not Cheap and Is Barely Available!
Ryzen 5000 is impressive! Too bad it is out of stock in most places!
Leo estimated quite correctly that Ryzen 5000 would be a winner before it even launched.
The price is a bit of a sore subject though
Maybe some additional models would help the pricing
5950X opens up a new level of performance, just like the 3950X before it did
But we really like the Ryzen 9 5900X 12-core chip!
Have The Price Increases Been Justified?
Do you think the price increase has been justified?
What about the cooler? Do you miss its usefulness even on the higher core count processors?
Intel Is Still Hanging Around With Some Competitive Options
Intel is still hanging around fairly reasonably with the competitive Core i9-10850K at £440
Intel’s 11th Gen processors certainly look like they’ll be less impressive though
Other than pricing on some SKUs, pretty much everything about Zen 3 is highly impressive!
AM4 Is A Superb Platform And Keeps Getting Better
The AM4 platform also continues to prove superb, especially with competitive and competent B550 offerings
Leo likes the ASRock B550 Extreme 4 that he is currently reviewing
PBO2 Adds Further Value To Ryzen 5000 CPUs
PBO2 – what is it and how does it work in relation to PB2 and PBO?
AMD’s Precision Boost and Precision Boost Overdrive operating modes are very well designed and optimised
Undervolting should open up some additional overclocking/frequency headroom, just like we often see on laptops
PBO2 for 400 and 500 series chipsets, but it needs a Ryzen 5000 CPU
Will this help the dual-CCD processors in particular?
Fingers Crossed Ryzen 5000 Will Have Better Availability Soon
Ryzen 5000 proves alluring in many aspects – maybe we should stop mentioning the higher pricing as it very much looks to be justified!
Leo is tempted to upgrade his 12-core Zen+ Threadripper to Zen 3 – does his wallet deserve the battering?
Cache Memory or Cash Money?
Has The New Ryzen 9 5950X Made Threadripper Unnecessary?
We love Threadripper, but perhaps the Ryzen 9 5950X makes AMD HEDT even more niche
AMD’s AGESA Update System Is Very Consumer Friendly
The way the AGESA updates give free performance boosts with good BIOS stability is very consumer friendly, provided bugs are minimal
While we have dished out some pricing criticism for Ryzen 5000 – notably the 8 core – almost every other aspect of Zen 3 is highly praiseworthy!
KitGuru says:What are you thoughts on Ryzen 5000? Are you anxiously waiting to get an order in when stock becomes more prevalant in your region? Or have you been swayed to an alternative option at the given price points? Let us know!
Become a Patron!
Check Also
MSI announces value-oriented RTX 3070 Twin Fan graphics card
MSI is getting ready to launch a new budget-oriented series of cards called Twin Fan. …
AMD’s Ryzen 5000U CPUs are expected to arrive within the next few months, with a mix of Zen 2 refreshed SKUs and newer Zen 3 models. Recent leaks have started to point towards what performance we can expect from these upcoming processors.
A Geekbench 5 database entry for the Ryzen 7 5800U (Zen 3) has been spotted by Leakbench. When compared to the average result of an 8C/16T Ryzen 7 5700U (Zen 2), the 8C/16T Ryzen 7 5800U is about 20% faster in the single-thread benchmark (1189 vs 1421), and 3.6% in the multi-threaded benchmark (6226 vs 6450). These results are in accordance with the IPC increase that Zen 3 brings over the Zen 2 architecture, which is around 19% according to AMD.
As per the Geekbench database entry, the Ryzen 7 5800U has a base clock of 1.9GHz and boosts up to 4.4GHz. Compared to its predecessor, the Ryzen 7 4800U, that’s an increase of 200MHz in frequency. Additionally, it’s expected to come with a 10-25W TDP and integrated graphics based on the Vega architecture, featuring 8 CUs clocked at 2.0GHz (+0.25GHZ over the Ryzen 7 4800U iGPU), according to @ExecutableFix.
The Ryzen 5000U SKUs should be available next year. We expect to learn more about them at CES 2021, in January.
KitGuru says: Are you in the market for a new laptop? Are you waiting for the release of the Ryzen 5000U series before deciding which laptop you should buy?
Become a Patron!
Check Also
MSI announces value-oriented RTX 3070 Twin Fan graphics card
MSI is getting ready to launch a new budget-oriented series of cards called Twin Fan. …
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.