Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC Review
Source: Tech Power Up added 29th Oct 2020Introduction
Gigabyte sent us its GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC, its affordable custom-design graphics card based on NVIDIA’s third—and most important—GeForce RTX 30-series “Ampere” graphics card launch so far. Gigabyte carries forward its tradition of clean, understated custom designs, which focus on low noise and compatibility. The card is targeted at everyone who just wants the RTX 3070 for its gaming performance, and who just install the card and forget about it. In that sense, the Gigabyte Gaming OC shares the same goals as the Zotac Twin Edge OC, but takes a different approach—putting on some length in pursuit of making the card strictly full-height. You also get a decent factory overclock to boot.
NVIDIA’s second silicon based on the GeForce “Ampere” graphics architecture, the “GA104,” debuts with the GeForce RTX 3070. This chip is significantly smaller than the big “GA102” that’s at the heart of both the RTX 3080 and RTX 3090. Despite that, the RTX 3070 is equipped with more (and faster) CUDA cores than even the previous-generation flagship RTX 2080 Ti, and NVIDIA extensively markets the RTX 3070 as being faster than the $1000 card, at half its price. This should mean that the RTX 3070 is capable of not just maxed-out 1440p gaming with RTX-on, but also 4K UHD gaming with fairly high settings, as the RTX 2080 Ti was built to do just this. The e-sports crowd has reason to rejoice with the RTX 3070 being capable of high refresh-rate 1440p and 1080p gaming, which required footing at least $800 for an RTX 2080S from the previous generation. For the full details on RTX 3070 technology and architecture, refer to our RTX 3070 Founders Edition article.
The Gigabyte RTX 3070 Gaming OC, as we explained, is a sincere custom-job on the RTX 3070, with a large triple-fan WindForce 3X cooling solution that’s rated for much higher thermal loads than the 220 W (reference) that the RTX 3070 can throw at it. The additional cooling headroom is traded in for lower noise. The card features three fans and a heatsink that has five copper heat-pipes which make direct contact with the GPU at the base. The heatsink is much longer than the PCB, which means that airflow from the third fan goes right through a large cutout in the card’s backplate—a concept not unlike NVIDIA’s dual-axial flow-through. Gigabyte even made sure that the shorter PCB shouldn’t mean that the power connectors are awkwardly located near the card’s center, and still at the card’s tail end, using an interesting internal riser. The card pulls power from a unique 6+8 pin combination of standard PCIe power connectors. Gigabyte also gave the card a significant 1815 MHz factory OC, which is in the same league as the premium MSI Gaming X and EVGA FTW3 Ultra. All this, for $570. In this review, we put this card through its paces to show you if you really need to spend any more on the premium RTX 3070 offerings.
Price | Shader Units |
ROPs | Core Clock |
Boost Clock |
Memory Clock |
GPU | Transistors | Memory | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RX 5700 | $330 | 2304 | 64 | 1465 MHz | 1625 MHz | 1750 MHz | Navi 10 | 10300M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
GTX 1080 | $330 | 2560 | 64 | 1607 MHz | 1733 MHz | 1251 MHz | GP104 | 7200M | 8 GB, GDDR5X, 256-bit |
RTX 2060 Super | $380 | 2176 | 64 | 1470 MHz | 1650 MHz | 1750 MHz | TU106 | 10800M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
RX Vega 64 | $400 | 4096 | 64 | 1247 MHz | 1546 MHz | 953 MHz | Vega 10 | 12500M | 8 GB, HBM2, 2048-bit |
GTX 1080 Ti | $650 | 3584 | 88 | 1481 MHz | 1582 MHz | 1376 MHz | GP102 | 12000M | 11 GB, GDDR5X, 352-bit |
RX 5700 XT | $370 | 2560 | 64 | 1605 MHz | 1755 MHz | 1750 MHz | Navi 10 | 10300M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
RTX 2070 | $340 | 2304 | 64 | 1410 MHz | 1620 MHz | 1750 MHz | TU106 | 10800M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
RTX 2070 Super | $450 | 2560 | 64 | 1605 MHz | 1770 MHz | 1750 MHz | TU104 | 13600M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
Radeon VII | $680 | 3840 | 64 | 1802 MHz | N/A | 1000 MHz | Vega 20 | 13230M | 16 GB, HBM2, 4096-bit |
RTX 2080 | $600 | 2944 | 64 | 1515 MHz | 1710 MHz | 1750 MHz | TU104 | 13600M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
RTX 2080 Super | $690 | 3072 | 64 | 1650 MHz | 1815 MHz | 1940 MHz | TU104 | 13600M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
RTX 2080 Ti | $1000 | 4352 | 88 | 1350 MHz | 1545 MHz | 1750 MHz | TU102 | 18600M | 11 GB, GDDR6, 352-bit |
RTX 3070 | $500 | 5888 | 96 | 1500 MHz | 1725 MHz | 1750 MHz | GA104 | 17400M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
Gigabyte RTX 3070 Gaming OC |
$570 | 5888 | 96 | 1500 MHz | 1815 MHz | 1750 MHz | GA104 | 17400M | 8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit |
RTX 3080 | $700 | 8704 | 96 | 1440 MHz | 1710 MHz | 1188 MHz | GA102 | 28000M | 10 GB, GDDR6X, 320-bit |
RTX 3090 | $1500 | 10496 | 112 | 1395 MHz | 1695 MHz | 1219 MHz | GA102 | 28000M | 24 GB, GDDR6X, 384-bit |
brands: EVGA Gigabyte MSI NVIDIA RTX ZOTAC media: Tech Power Up keywords: 4K Flagship Gaming Review
Related posts
Notice: Undefined variable: all_related in /var/www/vhosts/rondea.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/rondea-2-0/single-article.php on line 88
Notice: Undefined variable: all_related in /var/www/vhosts/rondea.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/rondea-2-0/single-article.php on line 88
Related Products
Notice: Undefined variable: all_related in /var/www/vhosts/rondea.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/rondea-2-0/single-article.php on line 91
Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /var/www/vhosts/rondea.com/httpdocs/wp-content/themes/rondea-2-0/single-article.php on line 91